postbaccalaureate programs vs. concurrent enrollment

Started by chiba_san
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

chiba_san

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I have a Ph.D. in psychology and am seriously considering applying to medical school. I will need to complete the necessary prerequisites and am wondering if it makes a difference if I just take classes through concurrent enrollment without being in a formal program or working towards a degree, or if medical schools prefer applicants that have completed a formal postbaccalaureate program.
 
The research I have done, through this site, indicates that we have more of an advantage from the post-bacc. Mainly, due to a formal letter of recommendation (most programs) and linkage to medical schools (some programs). With a Ph.D, I would strongly look into a linkage program (possibly saving the LAG year). Just food for thought. Best of luck either way.
 
OP,
I would take only the necessary prereq's (the med school you want to got to) requires first, before post-bacc, because there were a couple of people in my post-bacc that did'nt get in because they were trying to finish thier pre's and do post-bacc simultaneously. The info regarding a med schools particular prereq's can ususally be obtained from thier web site (you probabaly already knew this, sorry just thought I'd make sure.). I SHOULD SAY, MOST IMPORTANTLY, I'M NOT SURE WHY THEY DIDN'T GET IN (work ethic vs overload). I never wanted to ask them because I didn't really hang out with them a lot and it seemed inappropriate. I do know that at least one of them bounced back and ended up going to podiatry school. 🙂