? Practice PBL case ?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

ItsGavinC

Full Member
Moderator Emeritus
20+ Year Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2001
Messages
11,749
Reaction score
24
What follows is an opportunity to test your skills at a bit of case-based learning. This is an actual case that I've had at my school. It and another accounted for 30% of our module grade. Some notes of worth:

? Most importantly, the author and originator of this case is Dr. Speck, of the University of Kentucky College of Medicine.

? Try to answer the questions that are included at the end of each update, and also try to utilize your diagnostic skills. Feel free to post so we can all discuss what we think is happening.

? What follows is Part 1. Part 2 will be posted on Monday evening, and Part 3 (the final part) on Wednesday evening.

? The case resolution will be posted on Thursday evening, and will give you a chance to compare your diagnosis against the true diagnosis.

? Have fun, but please do not "quote" any part of the case in your responses. That is, do NOT use the quote button, but feel free to rephrase important points in your own words. This allows me to "delete" all of my posts (which contain the actual case wordage) in case I must. Thanks!
 
Part 1 - Case introduction

ZK, a teenager, presents to the emergency room accompanied by his parents. Z. K. exhibits an ashen color, dyspnea and a mild cough. He reports that earlier in the afternoon he had been swimming at a private outdoor pool and had inhaled something that caused some moderate discomfort and excessive coughing. After moving from the area he had felt better and the coughing had ceased for a while. He had a history of allergy-induced asthma and routinely carried an inhaler. In the emergency room, he was visibly anxious and his breathing rate was 22 breaths per minute. His blood pressure was 140/90 mm Hg and his heart rate was 90 bpm. There was a significant amount of frothy sputum.

Explain the potential causes for any abnormal symptoms.
 
I love cases!!!

Yes, another to do!!!

We do like 4-5 cases a class here
 
Originally posted by ShawnOne
This feels like the USC interview all over again, I'm game..

Facts:
-ZK has a history of allergy induced asthma
-He is experiencing dyspnea and coughing
-He was swimming earlier
-He inhaled an unkown substance which caused coughing, which later ceased.
(From what I know) His heart pressure/beat is normal.

Ideas:
-The symptom is a result of the inhaled substance
-The symptom is a result swimming.
-The symptom is a result of allergies (need more info)
Add inhalation of foreign body - right mainstem bronchus.
 
Isn't the blood pressure(140/90) alittle high? Supposed to be around 120/70?
 
Chief Complaint: Dyspnea w/ mild coughing

Subjective findings: Initiation of some moderate discomfort and excessive coughing which became better after moving from the area. The coughing had ceased for a while.

Med Hx: Allergy-induced asthma w/ routine use of inhaler.

Objective findings: BR 22/min, BP 140/90, HR 90 bpm, significant amt of frothy sputum. Vital signs are not significantly contributing to draw any concrete diagnosis in this case.

Let see if we can find out more details in following format:

Onset: we know this..

Palliative: what seems to alleviate the symptom? not provided or movement from one place to another caused symptom to subside, but we are not for sure.

Provocative: what provokes the symptom. not known at this case, should find out more.

Quality of symtom: na, should find out more

Radiation: Is there any radiating pain in the region? na, should find out more

Severity: Looks severe enough to exhibit ashen complexion and being visibly anxious.

Time(duration of symptom): We know the pt's improved after movement from the area.

My impression(idea):
This is indication for air way obstruction due:
allergic response due inhalation of unknown substance or mechanical obstruction due to inhalation of unknown object or severe allergy-induced allergy. Significant amt of frothy sputum should give some clue, but I am not sure. Could be anything..

Radiographic study of chest followed by blood work should be great asset to rule out few of above indication
 
Originally posted by Radioheadblue
Isn't the blood pressure(140/90) alittle high? Supposed to be around 120/70?

no i think 120/80 is normal.

LEARNING ISSUES?
-whats the normail breathing rate?
 
My observations:

- High BP
- High breathing rate (nearly twice the normal rate)
- Caused due to inhaling an unkown chemical


is the patient currently on any medications???
 
Part 2

ZK was placed on supplemental oxygen and his color and attitude seemed to improve. However, over the next several hours, his breathing became more labored. Use of the inhaler provided little benefit. Arterial blood gases were obtained while breathing 100% O2 and while breathing room air. Those values were:

FI o2 =_ 1.0_ _ Pao2 =_ 65 mm Hg_ _ Paco2 =_ 30 mm Hg
FI o2 =_ .21_ _ Pao2 =_ 45 mm Hg_ _ Paco2 =_ 25 mm Hg

Based on these findings, what is the likely underlying problem?
 
Part 3

ZK was hospitalized, heavily sedated, intubated and maintained on a constant pressure ventilator and supplemental oxygen for the next several days. The ventilator rate was set at 15 breaths/min. Initial ventilator pressure was 5 cm H20. It became necessary to increase the pressure of the ventilator over the first few days up to a level of 20 cm H20. His heart rate was 80 bpm, blood pressure was 130/90 mm Hg and end-tidal Pao2 and Paco2 were 55 and 25 mm Hg, respectively. A synthetic surfactant was administered via inhalation therapy and steroids were prescribed.

Over the course of the next few days, as the Pao2 improved, the pressure of the ventilator was gradually decreased. As the level of sedation was decreased, the Paco2 increased and the patient began to breathe spontaneously. A week later a successful attempt was made to wean the patient from the ventilator. The patient was eventually discharged with the warning that he should refrain from strenuous activity.

What were the physiologic bases for each of the observations and interventions throughout the course of this pathology?
 
Resolution
(All information contained here needed for Arizona students to receive full points on this case):

Part 1
Ashen color ? suggests poor blood flow and/or poor oxygenation of blood

Dyspnea ? a problem with breathing. This may be related to: 1) the activation of irritant receptors (due to lung damage or outside irritants), 2) an abnormal work level required for ventilation (due to poor oxygenation of the blood or a stiff lung). In either case the patient is experiencing a perception of abnormal, difficult breathing.

Cough ? probably due to irritation of the airways resulting in activation of irritant receptors. Again, there could be multiple reasons for this.

The history of asthma suggests that his airways may be hyperreactive and that excessive bronchoconstriction could be a problem.

The fact that his condition improved suggests that any asthma-related issues probably resolved, however there is a chance of a delayed response to the inhalation. Bronchoconstriction would increase the resistance to airflow and severe constriction might reduce the effective ventilation, even though the inspiratory and expiratory muscles might be strongly activated. If ventilation is reduced, one would expect an increase in PaCO2 and a decrease in PaO2.

Visibly anxious ? this suggests his sympathetic nervous system output is likely to be increased. That contributes to an increase in blood pressure (SNS activity may increase cardiac output, heart rate and/or total peripheral resistance). All increase pressure! The sympathetic nervous system also dilates airways ? that?s good._ If blood gases are affected, it is possible that chemoreceptors also are stimulating an increase in heart rate,_ blood pressure, and respiratory rate.

The increased respiratory rate could also potentially be related to a decreased lung compliance causing a breathing pattern of rapid, shallow breathing.

Frothy sputum ? sputum indicates enhanced secretions and a frothy nature suggests it may contain surfactant which acts like a detergent and may cause ?suds?. The noted presence of a frothy sputum suggests that there is increased production of fluid in the lungs and that it is coming from the gas exchange areas ? not just mucuc from the conducting airways. This is consistent with damage of the lung.


PART 2

Supplemental oxygen will increase the alveolar PO2 and should improve the oxygenation of the blood. As hemoglobin is oxygenated, it has a red color so that is likely to contribute to the improved color. Also, as the PaO2 increases, the sympathetic drive may decrease. The very fact that something is being done may relieve some of the anxiety, which could have identical effects. The PaO2 of 45 mm Hg while breathing room air suggests that there is a significant barrier for the movement of oxygen, assuming that alveolar ventilation is normal. The fact that the inhaler provided little benefit suggests that the airways are already dilated. With dilated airways, one would suspect that this problem results from problems in the alveolar-capillary membrane leading to decreased diffusion. A decrease in surface area (due to loss of alveolar membrane or reduced capillary blood flow) or an increase in the thickness of the membrane would decrease diffusion. Both of these might be expected after poisoning or damage of the alveolar cells. Giving ZK 100% oxygen improves his PaO2 slightly by increasing the pressure gradient for diffusion of oxygen.
_ _ _
The threshold for activation of the peripheral chemoreceptors is a PaO2 of about 60 mm Hg. When ZK is breathing room air, his low PaO2 stimulates these receptors, which in turn stimulate increased depth and rate of breathing._ The increased ventilation elevates the alveolar PO2 slightly, but not enough to cause sufficient oxygen diffusion._ Since CO2 is more soluble than O2, its diffusion across the alveolar-capillary membrane is usually not affected as much as O2. Therefore, with the increased ventilation, the alveolar PCO2 falls leading to a decrease in PaCO2._ When the PaO2 improves (with 100% O2), there is reduced stimulation of peripheral chemoreceptors, the patient breathes less and the PaCO2 returns toward normal._

PART 3

Because of the deteriorating blood gases, the patient is hospitalized. Sedation reduces anxiety (and sympathetic nervous system activity) and decreased the metabolic rate. Decreasing the metabolic rate is important to conserve the limited amounts of oxygen carried in the poorly oxygenated blood. Mechanical ventilation also decreases the body metabolism since the respiratory muscles do not have to do any work.

A constant pressure ventilator applies a given pressure and assumes that a reasonable volume will enter the lungs. The need to increase the ventilator pressure suggests that the lung compliance is decreasing. This is consistent with damage to the lung lining leading to inflammation, loss of tissue, pulmonary edema, ?wet lung?. The accumulation of debris and fluid decreases the lung compliance._
This finding of a stiff lung due to pulmonary exudates is consistent with restrictive diseases such as ARDS (adult respiratory distress syndrome). Similar problems were encountered in SARS._
Both decreased surface area and thickened membrane will decrease diffusion of gases.

Heart rate and blood pressure ? At first glance these look borderline normal. However, given that ZK is sedated (or possibly anesthetized), one would expect lower values. The values are probably being increased by drive from the peripheral chemoreceptors. The central chemoreceptor is greatly reduced because of the hyperventilation that is occurring.

The synthetic surfactant was administered to increase lung compliance and prevent further damage to lung tissue by the inflation pressure. It is possible that the endogenous synthesis of surfactant was suppressed by the damage. It is also likely that the edema that was occurring resulted in dilution of the surfactant, thus minimizing its effectiveness. Additional inhaled surfactant would help reduce surface tension and increase lung compliance.

The steroids were presumably anti-inflammatory in nature and represented an attempt to reduce the inflammatory damage. It is also possible that they helped stimulate spontaneous formation of surfactant.

As the required inflation pressure decreased, the lung compliance was obviously increasing. When it approached normal ranges, the chances were good that some healing and restoration had occurred. Reducing the ventilator activity and increasing the metabolic activity (by reducing sedation) helped restore the PaCO2 toward normal. As PaCO2 increased the central chemoreceptor drive to breathe returned and ZK began to attempt to breathe on his own.

Although lung function was adequate to meet resting levels of activity, full lung function had not returned. The caution to avoid exercise was to prevent high respiratory lung pressures associated with stressed ventilation and high blood pressures as well._ It is likely that some damage was done to the pulmonary vasculature as well as the alveolar membrane.
 
Top