D
Deleted member 737595
This is about service EC's specifically, including serving the homeless, teaching, Africa trip (you know what I'm talking about), fund raising, blood donation drives, soup kitchen, Peace Corp, MOTHER THERESA, you get the idea...
There is the well-accepted theory of authentic volunteer to cookie cutter volunteer/service person. The idea is that, the goal is to present yourself to medical schools as an authentic volunteer through a formula: start early, commit and serve those less fortunate for 100 + total undergraduate hours minimum in order to seem like you're NOT doing it for medical school.
How many matriculants to US medical schools ACTUALLY and TRULY commit to service activities over several years SOLELY out of an interest in service for altruism and out of the goodness of their hearts? How can ADCOM leaders, who are in no way stupid or naive about pre-medicine extra curriculars, be led to believe that by doing something with committment for several years and hundreds of hours the applicant has done it completely without even THINKING of how it might one day appear in the medical school application.
My philosophy on this, is that the ORIGINAL REASON for embarking on a service project extracurricular is PRIMARILY TO DEMONSTRATE ALTRUISTIC COMPETENCY to medical schools. In other words, students in general would not partake in or commit such amount of time to service if it weren't for medical, dental, et cetera school. HOWEVER, after beginning the project, the continuation in and passion throughout such endeavor becomes such that while it will be important for the application, now I the applicant have developed an understanding and appreciation for service.
In other words, my question is: is the key to demonstrate that you served voluntarily COMPLETELY out of the goodness of your heart and for altruism to the medical admissions people OR to demonstrate that, taking an experience that is expected from medical schools, you capitalized on the experience and actually learned from it and have grown your altruistic feelings and experience in empathy.
I say this because the sentiment I have seen is that TOP candidates are the ones who have not only committed many hundreds of hours of community service, but the ones who have done it completely out of passion and without regard to med school. Is this realistic?
Thoughts?
There is the well-accepted theory of authentic volunteer to cookie cutter volunteer/service person. The idea is that, the goal is to present yourself to medical schools as an authentic volunteer through a formula: start early, commit and serve those less fortunate for 100 + total undergraduate hours minimum in order to seem like you're NOT doing it for medical school.
How many matriculants to US medical schools ACTUALLY and TRULY commit to service activities over several years SOLELY out of an interest in service for altruism and out of the goodness of their hearts? How can ADCOM leaders, who are in no way stupid or naive about pre-medicine extra curriculars, be led to believe that by doing something with committment for several years and hundreds of hours the applicant has done it completely without even THINKING of how it might one day appear in the medical school application.
My philosophy on this, is that the ORIGINAL REASON for embarking on a service project extracurricular is PRIMARILY TO DEMONSTRATE ALTRUISTIC COMPETENCY to medical schools. In other words, students in general would not partake in or commit such amount of time to service if it weren't for medical, dental, et cetera school. HOWEVER, after beginning the project, the continuation in and passion throughout such endeavor becomes such that while it will be important for the application, now I the applicant have developed an understanding and appreciation for service.
In other words, my question is: is the key to demonstrate that you served voluntarily COMPLETELY out of the goodness of your heart and for altruism to the medical admissions people OR to demonstrate that, taking an experience that is expected from medical schools, you capitalized on the experience and actually learned from it and have grown your altruistic feelings and experience in empathy.
I say this because the sentiment I have seen is that TOP candidates are the ones who have not only committed many hundreds of hours of community service, but the ones who have done it completely out of passion and without regard to med school. Is this realistic?
Thoughts?