if you take anything away from intro neuro, take away the cranial nerves (what they do and how to objectively test their function) and brain blood supply for strokes (and their expected manifestations like hemiplegia, speech, etc.). Stuff that gave me trouble like tracks and pathways is stuff that I haven't used since I was tested on them. Neuro interventions will be another good class. People make neuro out to be way worse than it is. At the end of the day, if you have a parkinson or TBI patient, you treat based on symptoms and deficiencies/dysfunctions. I never once sat there during my clinical and thought "hmm, so the brain pathway for this is...." because it doesn't matter. You treat what you see. But just my opinion, I'm sure some will disagree.