How often do you prescribe supplements (e.g. methylfolate, ginkgo biloba, etc.) and vitamins for psychiatric disorders?
Where is the best place for patients to buy them?
Where is the best place for patients to buy them?
I don't. I let patients know about L-methylfolate if genetic testing indicates a deficiency, but caution them about my skepticism about its efficacy. I don't prescribe alternatives ever. If someone is asking "what else can I do," I might review alternatives. But I'm very transparent that most of the supplements have risks. Like ginkgo and blood thinning. They aren't benign, and should be weighed like any medication choice.
I only recommend this stuff if there's data backing it. Most of this stuff doesn't require a prescription so I educate the patient on it, and tell them if they want to give it a try.
SAM-E, St. John's Wort, L-Methylfolate, and Vitamin D do have data backing their use. I don't, however recommend these first-line.
Gingko, to my knowledge, only helps patients of older age, based on a theory with a study backing it, that it helps with increased blood flow to the head. So if someone younger takes it, they usually don't suffer from any decreased blood flow and hence it didn't help in the study I saw. This study was years ago so if anyone has any newer data let me know.
L-Methylfolate 15 mg daily is now available for less than $20 a month if you go to the right websites.
My last read of some of the newer stuff, at least as of last year-ish, was that Vitamin D actually does not have any data that supports its supplementation. We know that deficiencies are associated with mood and cognition changes, but supplementation does not show a reversal of those changes. Is there something newer in this area that goes against that?
I mean it's worth repleting for the skeletal effects alone and appears to reduce the risk of falls, so as physicians we psychiatrists certainly ought to prescribe it if our patients are deficient but my read of the evidence to date for improving mood and cognition is the same as yours.
, was that Vitamin D actually does not have any data that supports its supplementation.
They also had the juice of some berry that was really big at the time I can't remember the name of now. Something like anona?
The last I read about it, there was an interesting U shaped curve with Vitamin D levels as it related to cardiovascular health, with optimal health being in the middle (I don't remember the exact numbers, closer to 40-50 or so I think). High levels and low levels were both associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. My lab now uses 30-100 as a normal reference range, but from my foggy memory I kind of recall starting to go over 75 was not good. It seems the lower end of normal has been increased over time without a lot of great evidence.I mean, it's pretty benign, unless someone is really overdoing it, but yeah, I thought that the risk of falls and calcium absorption effects with supplementation data were equivocal as well?
This was the 1990s before acai was trending. I googled a bunch and the name that looks the closest to me is Noni berry, of which juice is apparently made. I'm not positive it was Noni, but sounds familiar. It was one of those things I remember them sampling and my family buying for a while and then seemed to disappear. Doesn't look like it was too great: Noni juice - WikipediaYou're likely thinking of Acai berry, which supposedly has very high levels of antioxidants and was one of the earliest things labelled as a "super food". It's good for you, but as far as I know there's no data showing any actual health benefits beyond that of other berries.
The last I read about it, there was an interesting U shaped curve with Vitamin D levels as it related to cardiovascular health, with optimal health being in the middle (I don't remember the exact numbers, closer to 40-50 or so I think). High levels and low levels were both associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. My lab now uses 30-100 as a normal reference range, but from my foggy memory I kind of recall starting to go over 75 was not good. It seems the lower end of normal has been increased over time without a lot of great evidence.
L-methylfolate: If patient has depression resistant to standard treatments *and* either documented MTHFR mutation or elevated homocysteine
Vitamin D: If patient has depressive symptoms *and* serum 25-OH-D below 30
Melatonin: For short-term rebalancing of circadian dysrhythmia
N-acetylcysteine: For trichotillomania or skin picking
I usually put in a prescription unless the patients tells me the medication is easier/cheaper to find OTC. NAC in particular is not carried by many pharmacies but available cheaply on Amazon.
I have had patients come to me who request to take things like St John's Wort, Sam-E, ashwagandha, and various Chinese preparations that I know nothing about.
In general if they are already taking it and finding benefit I don't demand that they stop it, but I do ask them to please choose either an OTC supplement or a prescription, and not to take both together, since many of these may have overlapping mechanisms of action and could lead to serotonin syndrome or co-interference with drug metabolism.
Herbal preparations especially are almost totally unregulated and their content and potency can vary widely. There have been numerous publications documenting enormous discrepancies between the label claims and the actual content; for example this one, in which DNA from the source plant listed on the label was detected in only 4 out of 15 samples.
Authentication of Herbal Supplements Using Next-Generation Sequencing
Hmm, yes. I saw something about that with type 2 diabetics:The issue isn't negative health outcomes associate with deficiency, that is well established. The issue is more and more research suggesting that supplementation when someone is already deficient does not reverse those negative outcomes.
Thoughts on high dose Omega-3 for mood lability?
The issue isn't negative health outcomes associate with deficiency, that is well established. The issue is more and more research suggesting that supplementation when someone is already deficient does not reverse those negative outcomes.
This. Just as when a person buys illicit drugs off the street, there is no one guaranteeing that what they think they're buying is what they're actually buying. As @tr suggested, there is also a significant body of literature suggesting that supplements often are adulterated (e.g., contain pharmaceuticals in them, and/or are contaminated with heavy metals and other concerning toxins - particularly imported Asian supplements). One famous historical example is eosinophilia myalgia syndrome thought to be caused by contamination of Trp supplements sold in the US by a Japanese manufacturer in 1989. The FDA can remove supplements from the market once they've been shown to be unsafe, but they're not doing pre-sale safety testing. Caveat emptor for sure.Herbal preparations especially are almost totally unregulated and their content and potency can vary widely. There have been numerous publications documenting enormous discrepancies between the label claims and the actual content; for example this one, in which DNA from the source plant listed on the label was detected in only 4 out of 15 samples.
Authentication of Herbal Supplements Using Next-Generation Sequencing
Except for being approved initially for bio-efficacy, that's largely how generic drugs are regulated as well. The FDA requires companies to self-police themselves and can look into how they are self-policing themselves, but until recently the FDA itself has not tested finished products, and even now testing limited products is extremely limited. I read some of the observation letters the FDA writes to companies and they're toothless. I read one recently where pigeons were living in a factory and were pooping into containers that were supposed to be sterile, and the FDA basically just writes a nice letter saying, "We see pigeons pooping in sterile containers, it would be nice if you had a plan for that to stop."This. Just as when a person buys illicit drugs off the street, there is no one guaranteeing that what they think they're buying is what they're actually buying. As @tr suggested, there is also a significant body of literature suggesting that supplements often are adulterated (e.g., contain pharmaceuticals in them, and/or are contaminated with heavy metals and other concerning toxins - particularly imported Asian supplements). One famous historical example is eosinophilia myalgia syndrome thought to be caused by contamination of Trp supplements sold in the US by a Japanese manufacturer in 1989. The FDA can remove supplements from the market once they've been shown to be unsafe, but they're not doing pre-sale safety testing. Caveat emptor for sure.
This. Just as when a person buys illicit drugs off the street, there is no one guaranteeing that what they think they're buying is what they're actually buying.
Thoughts on high dose Omega-3 for mood lability?
I recommend the brands that do that (NatureMade being the most prominent).Consumer Reports every few years does a study where they get several OTCs from various manufacturers to see if it is what is claimed. I haven't read their last report but have read 3 prior ones. In the ones I read they mentioned the overwhelming majority of those studied were in fact what they claimed to be and found pretty much every brand name supplement to be trustworthy. They also mentioned 3rd party/private organizations that did testing and some of the supplements had stamps of those organizations approval.
But, I haven't read the latest report.
Another factor, despite the FDA approval and regulation of various meds, I've seen several patients get bad reactions to one brand and not another. Given the FDA regulation I can only conclude that it's likely the excipients that are differing in the different brands given that the active ingredient medication is supposed to be the same.
Last time I reviewed this literature was a while ago but my recollection is that the picture was muddied by a number of trials that supplemented vitamin D for depression, without first establishing deficiency. That led to predictably negative/mixed results. I believe at that time there were 2 trials that tested vitamin D supplementation for depression in people with established deficiency, and those both had positive results.
A quick swipe through PubMed just now reveals the following:
The effect of 2 different single injections of high dose of vitamin D on improving the depression in depressed patients with vitamin D deficiency: ... - PubMed - NCBI
A randomized controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation on perinatal depression: in Iranian pregnant mothers. - PubMed - NCBI
Vitamin D Supplementation Affects the Beck Depression Inventory, Insulin Resistance, and Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress in Patients with Major Depr... - PubMed - NCBI
I personally feel like supplements are important. I have been recommending them to most of my patients. I am currently looking for a good vitamin complex for myself too.
Even in people not deficient in them? And, what particular supplements? And is this based on empirical research, or a gut feeling?
Resist the grifting. You guys are physicians. No need to grift.
Emerging data is showing that Vitamin D could prevent and be protective against COVID-19, so in addition to the potential psych benefits I've been telling all patients to get a Vitamin D level and if deficient to supplement.
I have seen some patients significantly psychologically improve if deficient on Vitamin D and corrected but this is in a very small minority to the degree where I don't know if it's placebo. Most patients tell me they feel no specific difference, although it's still a good idea to get them to an optimal level. I have seen some patients with fibromyalgia improve with optimized Vitamin D levels. No improvement was complete remission of symptoms but more on the order of "I have slightly more energy that I can tell is from the Vitamin D, and my pain is about 5-10% less."
I personally feel like supplements are important. I have been recommending them to most of my patients. I am currently looking for a good vitamin complex for myself too.
Emerging data is showing that Vitamin D could prevent and be protective against COVID-19, so in addition to the potential psych benefits I've been telling all patients to get a Vitamin D level and if deficient to supplement.
I have seen some patients significantly psychologically improve if deficient on Vitamin D and corrected but this is in a very small minority to the degree where I don't know if it's placebo. Most patients tell me they feel no specific difference, although it's still a good idea to get them to an optimal level. I have seen some patients with fibromyalgia improve with optimized Vitamin D levels. No improvement was complete remission of symptoms but more on the order of "I have slightly more energy that I can tell is from the Vitamin D, and my pain is about 5-10% less."
Several patients I have with autoimmune problems told me their symptoms were also somewhat improved with Vitamin D levels. Usually nothing of huge significance but a noticeable improvement.
I've had some patients try SAM-E if they tried a few prescribed antidepressants and failed and in some the SAM-E worked well.
A problem with multivitamins is the overwhelming majority of people are not deficient on any of them. The complaint of it's really only making expensive urine is valid. That said, some people may need them (but these are the exception).
I'd rather have patients try an OTC supplement such as L-Theanine, Melatonin, Magnesium, or Tryptophan for sleep before an prescribed sleep med is given.
I also take Vit D supplementation and as long as you don't go wild with the dosing, generally doesn't approach toxic levels.
You guys ever see this study? Talks about how above certain latitudes, people have vastly underestimated how much vitamin D supplementation people often need.
Not surprised. In fact it makes sense although I'm taking a leap and fully admitting it. I've theorized that the increased incidence of Multiple Sclerosis as you go further from the equator may be directly in correlation to Vitamin D, especially since there is data showing there's a Vitamin D correlation with autoimmune diseases. So if my fully admitted hypothesis is correct if you adjusted Vitamin D accordingly in groups so everyone had about the same Vitamin D level no matter their location one should see a consistent incidence of MS instead of an increasing incidence of MS as you go further away from the equator. So anyone care to take my hypothesis and do a study? I don't even care if you don't put me as an author so long as you buy me a drink. (I also figure I'm not the first idiot who came up with this idea).
Also correspondingly this may have implications as to a precipitating factor for first-onset psychosis since a theorized mechanism is inflammation. Just as a study was done years ago showing that EPA may be a protective factor against developing schizophrenia in high risk groups so too may Vitamin D.
Again this is only a hypothesis.
Someone I knew did fellowship in Hawaii and I remember him telling me "funny but no one who was born or raised here seems to get Fibromyalgia."
- High dose caffeine (300mg/day) is a pretty benign treatment for those with treatment-resistant OCD that can have a quick response within a week. Also sometimes use IV caffeine as pretreatment in ECT to lower seizure threshold and lengthen the seizure duration.