-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Princeton Review
Started by blowmeupjon
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
B
Begaster
Not really, no. They basically ask you to take a test without practicing any of the material beforehand or really knowing what the MCAT is like. It's expected you do poorly. That way, they can advertise that their teaching raises the average student by xyz points.
The diagnostics are nonsense. I got a 20 on mine (and did very well on the real thing) and I don't know of anyone who broke 25 on their first try. So, don't freak out!
The diagnostics are nonsense. I got a 20 on mine (and did very well on the real thing) and I don't know of anyone who broke 25 on their first try. So, don't freak out!
NO, I meant the Full Lengths 1-9 that are on their online student center
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
cmon guys help a brotha out
i think so
i scored 30 on my FLs and got a 32 on the real thing
then again i only took 2 of them but my scores weren't significantly different from what i got on the AAMC. they were pretty much the same. i tended to score higher on science in the AAMC but verbal was more or less the same.
i scored 30 on my FLs and got a 32 on the real thing
then again i only took 2 of them but my scores weren't significantly different from what i got on the AAMC. they were pretty much the same. i tended to score higher on science in the AAMC but verbal was more or less the same.
thanks, any others ????
any other ppl who took pr full lengths? Input is highly appreciated