Priority for chest pain

Started by leviathan
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

leviathan

Drinking from the hydrant
Moderator Emeritus
20+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Though it may differ from state to state/country to country, what sort of priority would a person have in the ER if they had woken up from a crushing mid-sternal chest pain, upper back pain, nausea, and difficulty breathing? Would they be seen immediately, or would they have to wait behind other people? This is, of course, assuming there was not a full complement of trauma pt's in the ward already that were going to die if they were not treated that minute.
 
leviathan said:
Though it may differ from state to state/country to country, what sort of priority would a person have in the ER if they had woken up from a crushing mid-sternal chest pain, upper back pain, nausea, and difficulty breathing? Would they be seen immediately, or would they have to wait behind other people? This is, of course, assuming there was not a full complement of trauma pt's in the ward already that were going to die if they were not treated that minute.

Oh, pretty much immediately. Especially if they arrived via ambulance.
 
flighterdoc said:
Oh, pretty much immediately. Especially if they arrived via ambulance.

Nice...My mom had this happen a couple nights ago, and she came to me about it at about 1am...I decided with her pulse being normal/strong and skin was normal dry warm, I would give her some aspirin and antacids and see if it helped. Within 10 minutes, she felt better....

Anyhow, if I took her it would have been by car to the ER, but she thought she would have to wait 6 hours in the ER. Why would it be any different by ambulance, though?
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
leviathan said:
Why would it be any different by ambulance, though?

Good question. My experience is that the ambulance pass is really a pass for "Priority Filtering"

... i.e. get seen by the doc real quick, but side-lined if it doesn't turn out to be what it was thought to be.
 
leviathan said:
Nice...My mom had this happen a couple nights ago, and she came to me about it at about 1am...I decided with her pulse being normal/strong and skin was normal dry warm, I would give her some aspirin and antacids and see if it helped. Within 10 minutes, she felt better....

Anyhow, if I took her it would have been by car to the ER, but she thought she would have to wait 6 hours in the ER. Why would it be any different by ambulance, though?

Well, if you're in BC, ymmv.

However, if someone (especially of the right age) presents in an ED with a vauge complaint of chest pain (as it seems your Mom wound up with) she'd probably still have priority treatment - mainly because if she was having an MI she could crash quite rapidly, and in the mean time she's still loosing cardiac muscle,

And the ambulance is a ticket to an ED bed. They don't leave you on a gurney in the waiting area.

So, hopefully Mom got to a doctor and is doing OK?
 
flighterdoc said:
So, hopefully Mom got to a doctor and is doing OK?

Yeah, I got her to see her family doc the next day...he told her he wasn't worried at all, but ordered an HDL/LDL/triglyceride test....I think he should have ran a test for troponin or other cardiac enzymes just to be safe, but he didn't. Do you think he should have ran an enzyme test just to be safe that she didn't have a minor heart attack that night?
 
plenty of patients (with hangnails, etc) get transported to the ED in a medic unit, briefly seen by the charge nurse, then dispositioned directly to a chair in the waiting room. plenty of patients with real medical emergencies take their car to the hospital, get dropped off by the front door, make it in to the waiting area, and are immediately taken back to see an MD.

people think that a 911 ambulance ride to the ED = immediate treatment by MD, but this is not true and is a waste of EMS resources.
 
leviathan said:
Yeah, I got her to see her family doc the next day...he told her he wasn't worried at all, but ordered an HDL/LDL/triglyceride test....I think he should have ran a test for troponin or other cardiac enzymes just to be safe, but he didn't. Do you think he should have ran an enzyme test just to be safe that she didn't have a minor heart attack that night?


GEEZ, yes! If she had SS chest pain, etc she is a prime candidate for an MI. Even if it was just angina, she needs a workup (unless she's planning on going quietly) and appropriate treatment. WTF is a lipids panel going to show? That she needs to cut down on red meat?

I assume this was in BC? If so, it goes into my "socialized medicine like in Canada is crap" file.

In the US, that doctor (unless you're not relaying the entire story) would be practicing malpractice.

If it happens again, I'd call an ambulance for a ride. At worst, she'll get an exciting ride to an ED (hopefully) and a quick r/o MI.

Thats not even medicine, btw - more like paramedicine.
 
basementbeastie said:
plenty of patients (with hangnails, etc) get transported to the ED in a medic unit, briefly seen by the charge nurse, then dispositioned directly to a chair in the waiting room. plenty of patients with real medical emergencies take their car to the hospital, get dropped off by the front door, make it in to the waiting area, and are immediately taken back to see an MD.

people think that a 911 ambulance ride to the ED = immediate treatment by MD, but this is not true and is a waste of EMS resources.


How many people with crushing ss chest pain, radiating, and SOB get triaged by a nurse and then plopped into a chair? I've never seen it. They get monitored and O2 while waiting for enzymes, EKG and possibly U/S.
 
flighterdoc: i agree with you. i wasn't saying that substernal chest pain, diaphoresis, and SOB would or should be triaged to the waiting room. i was saying that non-emergent complaints do. likewise, when you get shot three times in the belly and dropped off at the door by your homies, you get treated....
 
flighterdoc said:
GEEZ, yes! If she had SS chest pain, etc she is a prime candidate for an MI. Even if it was just angina, she needs a workup (unless she's planning on going quietly) and appropriate treatment. WTF is a lipids panel going to show? That she needs to cut down on red meat?
YES!!! This is EXACTLY what I was thinking! I'm not even in med school yet, so I just assumed her FP "knew better" than me about what to do. I just found out he DID order an EKG stress test, so he did *something* at least...Still, if she had a minor heart attack I'm worried that it could lead to a major one in the future without proper intervention. I'm sure it's too late now to see troponin/ckmb/ldh/sgot in her blood, since it has already been 2 days...or am I wrong?


I assume this was in BC? If so, it goes into my "socialized medicine like in Canada is crap" file.
You betcha...this was in BC...

In the US, that doctor (unless you're not relaying the entire story) would be practicing malpractice.
Really...well I can't think of anything I'm not telling you. Except, she maybe isn't in the highest risk category for an MI yet, but what do you think: 45 year old female, maybe 15 lbs overweight, non-smoker, social drinker, blood pressure is always around 120/75, and no personal history of MI or CAD risk factors

If it happens again, I'd call an ambulance for a ride. At worst, she'll get an exciting ride to an ED (hopefully) and a quick r/o MI.

Thats not even medicine, btw - more like paramedicine.

Thanks for the advice...I already told her if it happens again to call 911 immediately because I didn't like her doctors tx at all.
 
leviathan: even if your DID LIKE the w/u and treatment provided by the PCP you should still call 911 if your mother's chest pain returns!
 
leviathan said:
YES!!! This is EXACTLY what I was thinking! I'm not even in med school yet, so I just assumed her FP "knew better" than me about what to do. I just found out he DID order an EKG stress test, so he did *something* at least...Still, if she had a minor heart attack I'm worried that it could lead to a major one in the future without proper intervention. I'm sure it's too late now to see troponin/ckmb/ldh/sgot in her blood, since it has already been 2 days...or am I wrong?



You betcha...this was in BC...


Really...well I can't think of anything I'm not telling you. Except, she maybe isn't in the highest risk category for an MI yet, but what do you think: 45 year old female, maybe 15 lbs overweight, non-smoker, social drinker, blood pressure is always around 120/75, and no personal history of MI or CAD risk factors



Thanks for the advice...I already told her if it happens again to call 911 immediately because I didn't like her doctors tx at all.


You're right, it's too late for reliable cardiac enzymes.

BTW, do you know that heart disease is typically underdiagnosed and treated in middle aged women?

She may have had an MI, she may have had angina, or she may have had a stress reaction. At any rate if it happens again she REALLY has to get it checked emergently.
 
In the US, that doctor (unless you're not relaying the entire story) would be practicing malpractice

Actually a very similar thing happened to my mother in law. She got a lipid panel from her PCP, and she is higher risk at face value than leviathans mom!

C
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
flighterdoc said:
You're right, it's too late for reliable cardiac enzymes.

The troponin-t stays up for 7-10 (possibly 12) days. It's not too late.

That is the diagnostic conundrum - a patient with positive enzymes, d/c'd from hospital 4 days after infarction, returns 3 days later with chest pain, positive troponin, but lower than before. Trending down, or reinfarcted?
 
Apollyon said:
The troponin-t stays up for 7-10 (possibly 12) days. It's not too late.

That is the diagnostic conundrum - a patient with positive enzymes, d/c'd from hospital 4 days after infarction, returns 3 days later with chest pain, positive troponin, but lower than before. Trending down, or reinfarcted?

Nice...so just to quell my anxiety, would it be possible for me to ask the lab technicians to do a quick measurement of troponin after they are done looking at lipids? Or would a doc need to authorize this first... 😕
 
Unless labs at your place are magically free it will take a physicians order to get it.

C

but if they are magically free let me know--I need my cholesterol checked.
 
I haven't read all the replies but, to borrow a phrase from 'Jerry McGuire'...

You had me at crushing mid-sternal chest pain.

If you are over 40 and you utter these words to the triage nurse the game is up. You belong in a bed ASAP. We will elicit the details from there.
 
Seaglass said:
Unless labs at your place are magically free it will take a physicians order to get it.

C

but if they are magically free let me know--I need my cholesterol checked.

Damn, oh well....I thought it wouldn't be too much trouble for them to do one more analysis while they already have a blood sample....hmm, maybe I can just add in the "OTHER" section of this lab sheet: Troponin-T....I wouldn't get in TOO much trouble if I'm caught would I? :laugh: :laugh: 🙄
 
Leviathan, please help me out here.

Do you know just what the hell your moms doc was thinking? The symptoms you described are essentially RIGHT OUT OF THE BOOK for an MI. Your Mom is in an appropriate range for an MI. The fact that she doesn't have OTHER risk factors doesn't insulate her from having one.

I know Canada has good doctors (they may be short on advanced diagnostic equipment but thats another issue). I can't believe that any physician (well, maybe an academic psychiatrist) wouldn't be all over this as a possible MI.

Not getting the appropriate diagnostic workup here is about as amazing to me as if someone went into the hospital for a hangnail and came out missing a kidney and lung.
 
flighterdoc said:
Leviathan, please help me out here.

Do you know just what the hell your moms doc was thinking? The symptoms you described are essentially RIGHT OUT OF THE BOOK for an MI. Your Mom is in an appropriate range for an MI. The fact that she doesn't have OTHER risk factors doesn't insulate her from having one.

I know Canada has good doctors (they may be short on advanced diagnostic equipment but thats another issue). I can't believe that any physician (well, maybe an academic psychiatrist) wouldn't be all over this as a possible MI.

Not getting the appropriate diagnostic workup here is about as amazing to me as if someone went into the hospital for a hangnail and came out missing a kidney and lung.

I would also like to know what he was thinking....did I mention that he *did* order an EKG stress test for her? So the only thing he didn't do was the enzyme tests. But still, that's a pretty big something to forget to do.
 
So what's the youngest patient anybody here's ever seen with an MI (not using cocaine or other drugs)? Mine was a 30 yr old female. Classic symptoms, only known risk factor was a moderate weight problem. Big tombstones on EKG, 3 cm lesion in LAD, stented same day.
 
When it happened to my mother in law the gist I got was that her PCP "knew her better" and "knew she couldn't have been having an MI." I think that people also downplay symptoms when they see their PCP because they don't want to irritate them and damage their relationship, whereas they will exagerate for us because hey - who cares if they piss us off.

C
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
flighterdoc said:
You're right, it's too late for reliable cardiac enzymes.

But it sure is NOT too late to get a stree test! Don't wait for the next episode of chest pain! What is it is a MI that is massive, causes cardiogenic shock (>50% mortality!!!), or even worse, an arrhythmia, such as VT/VF? Then even calling 911 may not prevent her death....
Just get her risk stratified! If she has CAD, there is a good chance it will show up on a stress test...If so, off to cath lab for a stent, then she is good to go!
My 65 yo uncle had the same thing! Chest pain during activity...Of course waited til the next day, called his doc and he ordered an out patient stress test for NEXT WEEK! I told him to get it done ASAP...He did, and they found high grade stenotic LAD, which he went off to cath lab, got his stent and was back to work the next week.....And he is a pediatrician!!!
My point is to get your mom stress tested BEFORE the next episode of CP....
Just my .02!
Mark

Edit: I looked in further posts and saw that she did get a stress test ordered...Make sure it is done ASAP, and make sure she doesn't flake on it!

Oh yeah, Pts w/ CP should have an ECG w/in 5 min of presentation to triage! Remember, the standard of care door to drug time for thrombolytics is 30 min...Time is muscle! If they sit in the waiting room they are losing precious myocardium!!!
 
Sessamoid said:
So what's the youngest patient anybody here's ever seen with an MI (not using cocaine or other drugs)? Mine was a 30 yr old female. Classic symptoms, only known risk factor was a moderate weight problem. Big tombstones on EKG, 3 cm lesion in LAD, stented same day.

I've seen three under age 25 but all were zebras

19 yo male receiving RT for some sort of mediastinal tumor essentially had coronary vasculitis

24 yo male with malignant hypertension (no drugs)

24 yo female post partum with coronary dissection

The youngest with true atherosclerotic coronary disease was a 28 yo male with every risk factor including diabetes and familial hyperlipidemia


As for the original post. This sort of practice which seems crazy to us in the ED is quite commom in the outpatient setting. Look at it from their point of view. They get people everyday saying they had chest pain yesterday, or two days ago, or last week. From their point of view you have already survived the initial event, you aren't in pain now, you don't have a gallup, you aren't in failure so it probably wasn't a huge MI. If they sent enzymes they wouldn't be back for at least a day and don't forget the sensitivity of a single troponin inunstable angina as opposed to MI is quite low. So instead they check a baseline EKG and look to see if you've already q'd out and then order an outpatient stress test of some sort. Then, most importantly, they tell you to go to the ED if the pain comes back. On the other hand if you call them in the middle of the night with crushing chest pain they will probably send you to the ED
 
ERMudPhud said:
I've seen three under age 25 but all were zebras

19 yo male receiving RT for some sort of mediastinal tumor essentially had coronary vasculitis

24 yo male with malignant hypertension (no drugs)

24 yo female post partum with coronary dissection

The youngest with true atherosclerotic coronary disease was a 28 yo male with every risk factor including diabetes and familial hyperlipidemia


As for the original post. This sort of practice which seems crazy to us in the ED is quite commom in the outpatient setting. Look at it from their point of view. They get people everyday saying they had chest pain yesterday, or two days ago, or last week. From their point of view you have already survived the initial event, you aren't in pain now, you don't have a gallup, you aren't in failure so it probably wasn't a huge MI. If they sent enzymes they wouldn't be back for at least a day and don't forget the sensitivity of a single troponin inunstable angina as opposed to MI is quite low. So instead they check a baseline EKG and look to see if you've already q'd out and then order an outpatient stress test of some sort. Then, most importantly, they tell you to go to the ED if the pain comes back. On the other hand if you call them in the middle of the night with crushing chest pain they will probably send you to the ED


Except, the FP didn't get a baseline EKG or enzymes, didn't advise the pt to go to the ED if it happens again, and it seems didn't do anything but ORDER a stress EKG (which I haven't been lead to believe has been done yet) and a lipid panel. Thats not good medicine even in the outpatient setting.

In the US if a pt presented like that to a PCP, I think that they'd get labs (baseline enzymes, even post event), an EKG, and strict orders to go to the ED via 911 if it happened again. Aside from being the appropriate tx, imagine what would happen if while waiting for a scheduled stress EKG or their lipids, the pt had an MI and died. This isn't even a CYA ordering of tests, it's simply the appropriate tx.

Now, based on the hx (relieved with ASA and antacids in 10 min) it's probably either a stress reaction or mild angina, but it's better to be safe. After all, it's someones Mom.
 
flighterdoc said:
Except, the FP didn't get a baseline EKG or enzymes, didn't advise the pt to go to the ED if it happens again, and it seems didn't do anything but ORDER a stress EKG

Actually, we weren't there so we don't know exactly what her discharge instructions were. That's one reason its always dangerous to second guess patient management from a distance.

flighterdoc said:
in the US if a pt presented like that to a PCP, I think that they'd get labs (baseline enzymes, even post event), an EKG, and strict orders to go to the ED via 911 if it happened again.

You think so? Try polling your FP colleagues on what they do with suspected angina in the clinic. I see patients all the time who say, "Yeah I've been having chest pain, I saw my doc about it and he scheduled a stress test for next week. I'm having pain again so he told me to come in to the ED"

As long as we are fixated on ordering outpatient enzymes for a transient episode of chest pain which happened >24 hours ago and assuming you believe in evidenced based medicine. Show me an article that advocates use of troponins in the outpatient work up of angina.

flighterdoc said:
Aside from being the appropriate tx, imagine what would happen if while waiting for a scheduled stress EKG or their lipids, the pt had an MI and died. This isn't even a CYA ordering of tests, it's simply the appropriate tx.

How exactly is having a set of enzymes cooking overnight in the lab going to keep your patient from dying in the next 24 hours. Tests aren't tx. Remember this is likely a little FP clinic not an academic center. They put their labs in a little mailbox, the courrier picks them up, and the results come back the next day. Even with a negative troponin this could still be unstable angina and they could have an MI the second they left your office.

The appropriate treatment is an aspirin a day (that might keep them from having an MI), schedule some sort of stress test as soon as possible, and instructions to go the ED if the pain came back.

Assuming this is cardiac ischemia is having an MI and dying is the most likely means of death? No. If they have an MI they will most likely go to the hospital and get treated for it. The persistant pain of an MI is hard to ignore and doesn't usually kill you quick. The big fear is the off chance that the 10 minutes of pain yesterday was actually an MI and that you have a post MI arrythmia(most common in the few days after an MI) that kills you quick. Having enzymes sitting in the lab won't prevent that either. These are the rare cases in which the PCP and patient is screwed but you can't prevent that short of admitting everyone who had CP within the last week to Tele until they've completed their workup. That doesn't happen here much less in Canada. Even on Tele sometime the vFib kills them.

flighterdoc said:
Now, based on the hx (relieved with ASA and antacids in 10 min) it's probably either a stress reaction or mild angina, but it's better to be safe. After all, it's someones Mom.
Every patient is someones mom, dad, child, or friend.

What I described is pretty much what happened to my Mom (CRF= high cholesterol, HBP, ex-smoker) and after her outpatient cardiac work up was negative she was subsequently diagnosed with biliary colic.

What's a "stress reaction" and why not add reflux, esophageal spasm, or biliary colic to the differential?
 
ERMudPhud said:
Actually, we weren't there so we don't know exactly what her discharge instructions were. That's one reason its always dangerous to second guess patient management from a distance.



You think so? Try polling your FP colleagues on what they do with suspected angina in the clinic. I see patients all the time who say, "Yeah I've been having chest pain, I saw my doc about it and he scheduled a stress test for next week. I'm having pain again so he told me to come in to the ED"

As long as we are fixated on ordering outpatient enzymes for a transient episode of chest pain which happened >24 hours ago and assuming you believe in evidenced based medicine. Show me an article that advocates use of troponins in the outpatient work up of angina.



How exactly is having a set of enzymes cooking overnight in the lab going to keep your patient from dying in the next 24 hours. Tests aren't tx. Remember this is likely a little FP clinic not an academic center. They put their labs in a little mailbox, the courrier picks them up, and the results come back the next day. Even with a negative troponin this could still be unstable angina and they could have an MI the second they left your office.

The appropriate treatment is an aspirin a day (that might keep them from having an MI), schedule some sort of stress test as soon as possible, and instructions to go the ED if the pain came back.

Assuming this is cardiac ischemia is having an MI and dying is the most likely means of death? No. If they have an MI they will most likely go to the hospital and get treated for it. The persistant pain of an MI is hard to ignore and doesn't usually kill you quick. The big fear is the off chance that the 10 minutes of pain yesterday was actually an MI and that you have a post MI arrythmia(most common in the few days after an MI) that kills you quick. Having enzymes sitting in the lab won't prevent that either. These are the rare cases in which the PCP and patient is screwed but you can't prevent that short of admitting everyone who had CP within the last week to Tele until they've completed their workup. That doesn't happen here much less in Canada. Even on Tele sometime the vFib kills them.


Every patient is someones mom, dad, child, or friend.

What I described is pretty much what happened to my Mom (CRF= high cholesterol, HBP, ex-smoker) and after her outpatient cardiac work up was negative she was subsequently diagnosed with biliary colic.

What's a "stress reaction" and why not add reflux, esophageal spasm, or biliary colic to the differential?

All good points. Stress is the result of some sort of argument at home - after all, we don't have the whole story. And, biliary colic and reflux probably wouldn't resolve in 10 minutes with asa and antacid, esophageal spasm would but leave some soreness or tenderness after, no?
 
flighterdoc said:
All good points. Stress is the result of some sort of argument at home - after all, we don't have the whole story. And, biliary colic and reflux probably wouldn't resolve in 10 minutes with asa and antacid, esophageal spasm would but leave some soreness or tenderness after, no?

Yes, don't forget that there was upper back pain here too, left arm pain and finger numbness the next day, and this whole situation occured one other time (when she never even bothered to TELL me). Also don't forget that the ASA and antacids only relieved the chest pain, and the upper back pain remained.
 
ERMudPhud said:
Every patient is someones mom, dad, child, or friend.
Thank you. I thought it, but you said it, which is one of the reasons I hang around this place.
 
Sessamoid said:
So what's the youngest patient anybody here's ever seen with an MI (not using cocaine or other drugs)? Mine was a 30 yr old female. Classic symptoms, only known risk factor was a moderate weight problem. Big tombstones on EKG, 3 cm lesion in LAD, stented same day.

27 y/o smoker, Bangladeshi male. In Queens, for some reason, the Bangladeshis have some of the WORST CAD at a young age, plus, many (or maybe most) of them smoke. When one of these guys came in with chest pain, WE started having chest pain.
 
Apollyon said:
27 y/o smoker, Bangladeshi male. In Queens, for some reason, the Bangladeshis have some of the WORST CAD at a young age, plus, many (or maybe most) of them smoke. When one of these guys came in with chest pain, WE started having chest pain.

That's true! When I was at Sinai/Elmhurst we considered South Asian descent to be the mother of all risk factors. It was weird
 
Sessamoid said:
So what's the youngest patient anybody here's ever seen with an MI (not using cocaine or other drugs)? Mine was a 30 yr old female. Classic symptoms, only known risk factor was a moderate weight problem. Big tombstones on EKG, 3 cm lesion in LAD, stented same day.

We had an 18 year old guy a few weeks ago...cath negative...had come in with anaphylactic reaction to an apple or something of the sort...enzymes up...doc ruled in MI related to vasospasom, i believe...he went home and graduated from high school this week...