I am a new family medicine residency graduate looking at jobs in the Midwest. I am trying to decide between a private practice comprised of 20-40 primary care doctors, and a medium sized hospital employed job. Both seem like great positions with fairly similar pay and earning potential. I understand the essential differences between being part owner and being employed, but I am having a very difficult time deciding. Can anybody shed some light on differences that might not be readily apparent, and might only be realized after 5, 10, 30 years of practice? Something like, "when I started off in private practice 'x' years ago, I wish I would have known 'blank'"
-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Private Practice vs Employed?
Started by Fam doc
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
I personally can't imagine going into private practice these days with all the governmental regulations. How are you getting your start up money to buy a practice?
D
deleted87716
In a physician-owned practice, you don't work for the man…you ARE the man.
In a physician owned practice - everyone gets paid, and all bills get paid, before you get paid.
As an employee the opposite: The hospital/group can be sinking - and you still get paid.
As an employee the opposite: The hospital/group can be sinking - and you still get paid.
D
deleted87716
In a physician owned practice - everyone gets paid, and all bills get paid, before you get paid.
As an employee the opposite: The hospital/group can be sinking - and you still get paid.
Not for long.
That's exactly why I do locums. I'm the relief help, no one owns me, and there is always an end date.The autonomy in a solo/small group is totally worth any potential loss of income compared to an employed position for me.
My former partner and I just parted ways over this issue. I'm not sure there is a right and a wrong answer. She was very worried about the future of medicine, both her personal income and the welfare of our ten employees. She sought safety in employment, and I joined one of the few remaining independent practices in the area.
She now works fewer hours and has great benefits. However, the bonus the hospital promised didn't come through, and her income has significantly decreased. I put in more hours, but I should take home more than twice what she does. She requests vacation time, I tell my office manager when I'm going to work. She finds comfort in the fact that a large institution guarantees her income. I find security in the fact that my career does not rely on the whim of a hospital CEO.
She now works fewer hours and has great benefits. However, the bonus the hospital promised didn't come through, and her income has significantly decreased. I put in more hours, but I should take home more than twice what she does. She requests vacation time, I tell my office manager when I'm going to work. She finds comfort in the fact that a large institution guarantees her income. I find security in the fact that my career does not rely on the whim of a hospital CEO.