- Joined
- Sep 26, 2002
- Messages
- 10,909
- Reaction score
- 1,156
There is no way they were logging things accurately and the PD didn't notice that Mr X never seemed to be on call, while Ms Y hit 80 hours each month. More likely they were either logging in the hours they would have worked before the sale, or it was the kind of place where everybody simply gives in timecards that add up to some number under 80, because if you don't, you get asked to redo it. Either way, that's fraud number one. Fraud number two is the representation the PD is making to ACGME each year regarding what their training consists of and how many hours people are spending in the ICU, etc.
So the PD really had no choice but to shut this down once s/he found out about it.
As far as the PD reading an email seems Orwellian, I think folks in residency don't have a good sense of what it's like to work in the private sector. Your bosses can read emails you send on their facility's computer network. They also have significant rights over email and web usage you do while on company time. That's the norm out there.
But you're making the assumption that a lot of call selling was going on, or that some people were selling a lot of calls, and some people were picking up a lot of extra calls. It might simply be that instead of sending out an email, saying hey, I've got family in town, can someone switch a call for me x night, the culture at their program, is to say, hey, I'll pay you $100 bucks for taking my call on x night. It's possible that each resident sold maybe one to two calls a year, in which case, the PD might not notice even if they were truthfully logging their calls. It sounds like the op only sold one call.
Certainly if some residents were selling all of their calls, you would think they'd have to be lying on timesheets for no one to notice. But lying on your timesheets is a pretty big deal saying you did work you didn't do is a pretty big deal, and I'm having trouble seeing a whole group of residents going along with that.
So we need more information from the op to clarify this one. I just disagree that it's obvious that they must be lying on their timesheets because I can imagine lots of scenarios where the call schedule is only slightly modified, and on one notices.