-
CycleTrack and SDN are teaming up to make medical school admissions more transparent and accessible! Read the announcement to learn how we’re supporting the future of CycleTrack’s free application-tracking tools .
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Programs cancelling matched applicants
Started by ORBITAL BEBOP
Get help with your application
Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.
ORBITAL BEBOP said:Hello,
What are the rules on the PD legally getting out the match contract with newly matched applicants? I have a friend who says the pd is going to report a discrepancy in her application to the NRMP. She does not have her contract yet.
ORBITAL
Was this b/c the applicant didn't want the program or the program didn't want the applicant. That's a strange situation, but I know that it can be done. We have a couple at my school who filled out their couples match status wrong, so one is in Wisconsin and one in Kansas. Both of their PD's said that they would let them out of their contracts to be in the same program. I don't know what excuse they are gonna give the NRMP, but it can evidently be done.
ORBITAL BEBOP said:I have a friend who says the pd is going to report a discrepancy in her application to the NRMP. She does not have her contract yet.
What's the discrepancy? I suppose if she lied or misrepresented herself in some way, then that would be grounds enough to terminate the match agreement.
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
These are case examples straight from NRMPs website. Basically it will depend on whether or not the applicant outright lied about something.
http://www.nrmp.org/res_match/policies/case.html
IV. Waiver Denied - Program
Description
After the 2005 Main Residency Match, the Pathology program at National Medical Center wrote to the NRMP, requesting a waiver of its match commitment to Dr. Baker. After Match Day, the program director obtained information about Dr. Baker's prior residency training, and he no longer felt comfortable offering him a position. The NRMP initiated a waiver review and learned that Dr. Baker had not omitted information about his prior residency training on his current residency application. Moreover, the new information obtained by the program after Match Day had been available prior to the rank order list deadline, when the program could have deleted the applicant's name from its rank order list. The NRMP denied the Pathology program's request for a waiver.
Policy
Section 5.1 of the Match Participation Agreement for Applicants and Programs states that the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order list or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank order list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a material breach of the Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
***
VIOLATION:
I. Violation - Applicants
Description
In the 2005 Main Residency Match, Dr. Scarlet O'Hara matched to the Family Practice program at American General Hospital. After the Match, the program informed the NRMP that Dr. O'Hara had forged her letters of recommendation. The NRMP initiated a violation investigation, collected information from relevant parties including the individuals who purportedly had signed the letters of recommendation, and determined that Dr. O'Hara had forged the letters. The NRMP permanently identified Dr. O'Hara as a match violator in the NRMP's Registration, Ranking and Results (R3) System, permanently barred her from participation in future NRMP matches, and sent a copy of the Final Report to the American Board of Medical Specialties and the Federation of State Medical Boards.
Policy:
Section 4.3 of the Match Participation Agreement for Applicants and Programs states that applicants are responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the information provided to programs, and programs are expected to provide complete and accurate information to interviewees. If the NRMP receives credible evidence that the applicant or program has violated the terms of the Agreement, the NRMP is authorized to take appropriate action.
Section 7.2 outlines for applicants and programs the consequences of a confirmed material violation of the Agreement. Applicants may be barred from subsequent NRMP matches and/or identified as a match violator to participating programs for up to three years or permanently, as determined by the NRMP.
http://www.nrmp.org/res_match/policies/case.html
IV. Waiver Denied - Program
Description
After the 2005 Main Residency Match, the Pathology program at National Medical Center wrote to the NRMP, requesting a waiver of its match commitment to Dr. Baker. After Match Day, the program director obtained information about Dr. Baker's prior residency training, and he no longer felt comfortable offering him a position. The NRMP initiated a waiver review and learned that Dr. Baker had not omitted information about his prior residency training on his current residency application. Moreover, the new information obtained by the program after Match Day had been available prior to the rank order list deadline, when the program could have deleted the applicant's name from its rank order list. The NRMP denied the Pathology program's request for a waiver.
Policy
Section 5.1 of the Match Participation Agreement for Applicants and Programs states that the listing of an applicant by a program on its certified rank order list or of a program by an applicant on the applicant's certified rank order list establishes a binding commitment to offer or to accept an appointment if a match results. Failure to honor that commitment is a material breach of the Agreement and may result in penalties to the program or applicant.
***
VIOLATION:
I. Violation - Applicants
Description
In the 2005 Main Residency Match, Dr. Scarlet O'Hara matched to the Family Practice program at American General Hospital. After the Match, the program informed the NRMP that Dr. O'Hara had forged her letters of recommendation. The NRMP initiated a violation investigation, collected information from relevant parties including the individuals who purportedly had signed the letters of recommendation, and determined that Dr. O'Hara had forged the letters. The NRMP permanently identified Dr. O'Hara as a match violator in the NRMP's Registration, Ranking and Results (R3) System, permanently barred her from participation in future NRMP matches, and sent a copy of the Final Report to the American Board of Medical Specialties and the Federation of State Medical Boards.
Policy:
Section 4.3 of the Match Participation Agreement for Applicants and Programs states that applicants are responsible for the completeness and accuracy of the information provided to programs, and programs are expected to provide complete and accurate information to interviewees. If the NRMP receives credible evidence that the applicant or program has violated the terms of the Agreement, the NRMP is authorized to take appropriate action.
Section 7.2 outlines for applicants and programs the consequences of a confirmed material violation of the Agreement. Applicants may be barred from subsequent NRMP matches and/or identified as a match violator to participating programs for up to three years or permanently, as determined by the NRMP.
Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn.edinOH said:Dr. Scarlet O'Hara is pretty much screwed.
lol