Last edited:
Of course it was. This got put in as an amendment to the bill at the last minute by the rabid anti-AA CRNA folks at the AANA. CAA's can't bill for services under a CRNA, only a (physician) anesthesiologist, so it effectively makes it impossible to hire CAAs in Wyoming. I'm not active in CAA legislative efforts and I'm sure there's more back-story there that I'm not privy to.Considering education and training of CRNA = AA this js Clownish nonsense. Spearheaded by AANA no doubt.
Perhaps ASA should sponsor a bill where AA supervises CRNA in WY
And yet there's anesthesiologists that work for CRNAs....They never actually intend to supervise AA. And no AA would ever denigrate themselves to accept such a position. The AANA is doing this for ego and to make themselves seem more important than they are. To blur the distinction between physician and nurse. Notice that nothing changed with their training... Still 1/4 the hours of a physician. Everything AANA does is based on politics not actual skill or qualification.
And yet there's anesthesiologists that work for CRNAs....
Neither would I. Just sayin'.I wouldn't work with militant crnas. They can go do whatever they want solo cases in rural nowhere.
And yet there's anesthesiologists that work for CRNAs....
There are a couple of crNa owned locums companies that hire physicians. Anyone willing to do that is a fool.
So CRNAs aren’t allowed to run a business? If they build rapport with their colleagues and want to build a business, nothing wrong with that. They are basically just a staffing agency at that point, they aren’t telling you how to practice medicine. I don’t really view them as CRNAs but view them as business owners. If they treat me fairly then I have no issues.There are a couple of crNa owned locums companies that hire physicians. Anyone willing to do that is a fool.
So CRNAs aren’t allowed to run a business? If they build rapport with their colleagues and want to build a business, nothing wrong with that. They are basically just a staffing agency at that point, they aren’t telling you how to practice medicine. I don’t really view them as CRNAs but view them as business owners. If they treat me fairly then I have no issues.
??
Anyone can run a business. That’s not the point.
The issue is that when you employ and exert control over someone who is superior to you in terms of training and work ethic and dictate terms thinking they’re equal. It’s riddled with conflict.
1. I’m an independent physician and do not have a boss. I work for myself.Like hospital administrators or AMCs are any better? You’re basically saying you’re only ok to work under a physician and a non-physician is not ok?
Plenty of physician owners who are shady. If a CRNA owner staffing agency is equitable and fair and exhibits good morals and ethics then I have no issues
Yes. I'm not "basically saying" it, I am saying it definitively. I will NEVER work for a CRNA run company and look down on anesthesiologist sell-outs who do with extreme prejudice. Let me know if you're one of those clowns so I can block you immediately.You’re basically saying you’re only ok to work under a physician and a non-physician is not ok?
Depends on the pay.
??
Anyone can run a business. That’s not the point.
The issue is that when you employ and exert control over someone who is superior to you in terms of training and work ethic and dictate terms thinking they’re equal. It’s riddled with conflict.
Worse yet is when you intentionally keep things vague.
I always find it interesting that CRNAs like to have this need to notify everyone of their presence and how great they are (small man syndrome), but when it comes to naming their companies and having transparency in their leadership and operations, it’s generally absent. They know this inherently that’s why. The recruitment of physicians is by deception or incentive only. The job doesn’t organically sell by itself.
They do this because they need MDs to be on medical staff which by definition only apply to physicians.
We all know what happens when there is a CRNA only group.
It comes down to: Do you care who is ****ing you? For some people it doesn't matter- abusive senior partner, Hospital employer, AMC Employer , CRNA employer. For some of us the CRNA employer is a lower circle of Hell than the others.Like hospital administrators or AMCs are any better? You’re basically saying you’re only ok to work under a physician and a non-physician is not ok?
Plenty of physician owners who are shady. If a CRNA owner staffing agency is equitable and fair and exhibits good morals and ethics then I have no issues
There are a couple of crNa owned locums companies that hire physicians. Anyone willing to do that is a fool.
This is the point I was trying to make. I’ve worked for a physician owned “partnership” group and been dragged along. Never again. So bad that we couldn’t staff rooms cause of the physician greed and difficulty recruiting.It comes down to: Do you care who is ****ing you? For some people it doesn't matter- abusive senior partner, Hospital employer, AMC Employer , CRNA employer. For some of us the CRNA employer is a lower circle of Hell than the others.
I gotta wonder where in the world there's a CRNA-owned group that runs true 1:3 medical direction.This is the point I was trying to make. I’ve worked for a physician owned “partnership” group and been dragged along. Never again. So bad that we couldn’t staff rooms cause of the physician greed and difficulty recruiting.
CRNA-owned group paid great salary, had no trouble hiring CRNAs/staffing rooms, continually giving pay raises when appropriate. This is 1:3 medical direction, not 1:6 or 1:8. Physicians still did blocks/lines, etc.
But some people would rather suffer a toxic physician owned group cause their egos are too big. Suffer away…
Failure.This is the point I was trying to make. I’ve worked for a physician owned “partnership” group and been dragged along. Never again. So bad that we couldn’t staff rooms cause of the physician greed and difficulty recruiting.
CRNA-owned group paid great salary, had no trouble hiring CRNAs/staffing rooms, continually giving pay raises when appropriate. This is 1:3 medical direction, not 1:6 or 1:8. Physicians still did blocks/lines, etc.
But some people would rather suffer a toxic physician owned group cause their egos are too big. Suffer away…
They don’tI gotta wonder where in the world there's a CRNA-owned group that runs true 1:3 medical direction.
majority are but not always. I know from personal experience. But whatever, believe me or notThey don’t
The whole game is QZ billing and keeping drs as a liability sponge
So which company is this which is Crna owned, operated and managed with decisions on hiring and firing of MDs but allows authority from physicians over Crnas.majority are but not always. I know from personal experience. But whatever, believe me or not
NOT.majority are but not always. I know from personal experience. But whatever, believe me or not
It's called Unicorn Anesthesia and it's located in Your Imagination.So which company is this which is Crna owned, operated and managed with decisions on hiring and firing of MDs but allows authority from physicians over Crnas.
Please name that company so we can learn.
There are anesthesia groups and locums groups that are CRNA owned on Gaswork and other job sites. One group advertised in LA area seemed like an anesthesiologist run group as their anesthesia website said "Dr. So-and-So" and his wife as the managing partners. Upon this guy's LinkedIn profile, he writes that he is a "nurse anesthesiologist" in California. I almost believed that he was a physician anesthesiologist from his website as he addresses himself as "Dr" and trained in prestigious program (but didn't specify that it was a CRNA program), he does have one of those RN phD things which technically is doctorate. In the CRNAs minds they are equivalent MD and phD
So which company is this which is Crna owned, operated and managed with decisions on hiring and firing of MDs but allows authority from physicians over Crnas.
Please name that company so we can learn.
Hey, they're practicing at the "top of their license." What an idiotic statement that is.In the world of scam artists, crNas are ate top.
Yeah, don't think that's gonna happen. There are AA-owned locum tenens placement companies, but they don't do any kind of group management. Strictly placement.The obvious next step is a group of AAs owning a hospital group of MDAs
So again...majority are but not always. I know from personal experience. But whatever, believe me or not
Its inevitableYeah, don't think that's gonna happen. There are AA-owned locum tenens placement companies, but they don't do any kind of group management. Strictly placement.
They have, to an extent.If ASA had any teeth they would sue AANA. Study their behavior and policy, and find reasonable legal ground and do it.
Dedicate 10% annual of budget on this.
Heck I’d contribute to it.
It would be a worthwhile effort.
The above is a joke.
🤣😂😅
You're quick - that was just released this morning.