I thought it was an interesting article, but I have a few issues/questions.
1) What does this guy propose we do with our money? He recommends not investing in stocks, bonds, commodities, mutual funds, and ETFs. This leaves savings accounts, checking accounts, and maybe money market accounts. Does he trust the FDIC to continue insuring those accounts? Should we all be stuffing money under our mattresses? If someone had done that for the last 10 years, they'd have lost ~20% as well due to inflation.
2) The 10-year point is a completely valid time-frame to choose when reviewing returns. However, we have just gone through the worst recession in U.S. history. So, it makes sense that our 10-year time-frame is gonna look pretty grim. Pick any other 10-year period in the last 50 years, and I think returns would look considerably better. Or include this most recent recession, but look at a 20-year or a 30-year period instead. Again, the returns don't look half bad.
This is where the guy just goes crackpot. I, my family, and America won't survive past 2012? WTF? How did this statement get into a mainstream media source? This is a "Thunderdome" reference. Give me a break.
Back on topic: I am in no way denying that America is in for some rough financial and economic times. I actually agree with the commentator that stocks are a poor investment in the long-term because I think we're gonna see some significant financial upheaval in our lifetimes. (I'm 28 for reference.) I wouldn't be surprised if America defaults on its debts and undergoes a depression. I think investing in concrete objects (gold, silver, land, etc.) is probably pretty wise. But, I really doubt we'll all be facing roves of cannibals anytime soon.