drusso Full Member Moderator Emeritus Lifetime Donor Verified Member Physician Verified Expert Gold Donor Joined Nov 21, 1998 Messages 13,250 Reaction score 7,857 Feb 22, 2020 #1 Members do not see this ad.
lobelsteve Full Member Staff member Volunteer Staff Lifetime Donor Verified Member Verified Expert 20+ Year Member Gold Donor Joined May 30, 2005 Messages 23,301 Reaction score 14,911 Feb 23, 2020 #2 I read that as sc not superior to prp.
D Doctodd Membership Revoked Removed 15+ Year Member Joined Jul 4, 2005 Messages 9,336 Reaction score 3,832 Feb 24, 2020 #3 lobelsteve said: I read that as sc not superior to prp. Click to expand... sc? stem cells? Id like to see the full study.
lobelsteve said: I read that as sc not superior to prp. Click to expand... sc? stem cells? Id like to see the full study.
D Ducttape Full Member Lifetime Donor Verified Member 10+ Year Member Gold Donor Joined Oct 7, 2011 Messages 16,754 Reaction score 7,245 Feb 24, 2020 #4 I take this as a reason for regenerative physicians to bill more, because of the extra cost of BMAC over PRP (something like $3000 vs $750?)
I take this as a reason for regenerative physicians to bill more, because of the extra cost of BMAC over PRP (something like $3000 vs $750?)
Ferrismonk Full Member Verified Member 15+ Year Member Joined Dec 12, 2006 Messages 3,105 Reaction score 3,675 Feb 24, 2020 #5 Whenever I see "PRP" in a study, I'd like to know more. How are they processing and at what final plt concentration? Interesting study nonetheless.
Whenever I see "PRP" in a study, I'd like to know more. How are they processing and at what final plt concentration? Interesting study nonetheless.