- Joined
- May 16, 2020
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 171
- Podiatry Student
I made up all my biomechanics logs. Complete waste of time.My program didn’t ask us to log every clinic patient unless it was for h&p, biomechanics, procedures, peds etc. i stopped logging those once I met my numbers
glad I'm not the only one!I made up all my biomechanics logs. Complete waste of time.
It amazes me that a deattach reattach of the Achilles’ tendon is not consider a rearfoot number on PRR
Its because its such a common procedure they wanted it included in foot.It amazes me that a deattach reattach of the Achilles’ tendon is not consider a rearfoot number on PRR
It is de/reattach 4.19 as procedure 1 and tendon (FHL) transfer/lengthen 5.1.2 is proc 2... exostectomy doesn't count as it's part of de/re for PRR or PLS.Hello everyone. I’m PGY-1 in new program without any seniors. Could you please help me to log this case ? Achilles tendon rupture with Haglund’s deformity. procedures : removed the bump, FHL transfer with tenodesis screw. Attached Achilles to FHL. How should I log this appropriately? 2 procedures: tendon transfer and cal osteotomy ? Or tendon transfer , cal osteotomy and Achilles tendon repair?
I read the new guidelines but not sure about this. Thank you so much and happy holidays!
May the forceps be with you 🙁Hello everyone. I’m PGY-1 in new program without any seniors..
Yep... very technically easy procedure, common. You also have to remember some older attendings even do the lateral approach and just retract Achilles to rasp calc (not advised, but not totally uncommon). If de/re was a RRA cat 5, what would be next... plantar calc spur is RRA? That would be crazy for those to not be foot core privi at facilities. Lol.Its because [Haglund] is such a common procedure they wanted it included in foot.
People without RRA could be barred from doing it in some systems.
At least thats how I understand it.
It is de/reattach 4.19 as procedure 1 and tendon (FHL) transfer/lengthen 5.1.2 is proc 2... exostectomy doesn't count as it's part of de/re for PRR or PLS.
This is your PD's job to tell and teach you these things... they are given lengthy guidelines from ABFAS on how to log PRR properly and common questions/issues and log updates. This issue you ask is clearly addressed. You can also find a lot of this stuff on PRR and ABFAS and CPME websites. I'd read that PPT link in its entirety and learn the common exclusions (unbundling) but I would also start with PD; it is literally what they're paid for. A new program PD should be discussing PRR with you probably weekly and checking your log monthly and prn based on cases and log questions if they intend for it to be a reputable program and keep status.
That is a pretty interesting procedure selection... usually, if the watershed area is diseased, you debride, reinforce, maybe graft or FHL xfer. If it's insertional with Haglund, you remove exostosis and anchor it at insert. Doing both seems a bit suspect to weaken both... it's not that pathology at both watershed and at insertion can't coexist occasionally, but which site was the complaint/issue/partial rupture on MRI and clinically?
May the forceps be with you 🙁
I had an unexpected month pop up that alloted me an extra month externship. There were limited options. I went to a really horrible VA for that month because they wanted bodies to cut toenails (I didnt know that at the time).
All the residents (and students) did was cut nails all day with some wounds here and there but mostly toenails.
At the end of the day they were forced to sit there and document each and every one of them. They spent 1-2 hours a day logging nail debridements on PRR.
Hello everyone. I’m PGY-1 in new program without any seniors. Could you please help me …
Yeah, those PRR categories are just the ABPM reqs for CPME... you can quit once you have 2x or 3x the numbers for biomech, H&P, etc. It needs to be fulfilled, but there's no point to crushing it. Everywhere is going to give you privileges for clinic, wounds, etc.
All I ever logged besides surgery was OR hardware removals as 'other clinical experiences.' The surgery logs from residency are very important for hospitals, privileges, etc (and besides, you'll have to be used to doing it after graduation for ABFAS on PLS).
We don’t support MAVs. We’ve advocated for milestones, like ACGME. The CPME did not adopt that change Document 320.
But it MAVs were going to stay, we recommended that biomechanical exams be problem-focused and not comprehensive. That recommendation was adopted for 2023.
Yeah, in practicality, nothing truly needs to be logged aside from surgical OR procedures... that and BC/BQ is where the rubber hits the road for any facility privileging. The other stuff is just a formality for residency grad.Thanks for making it easier. Eventually I hope those biomechanics exams get eradicated entirely.