- Joined
- Feb 11, 2009
- Messages
- 622
- Reaction score
- 1
I've only had three people read mine.
One (premed advisor) basically said my first draft sucked, so I rewrote it. Sent it back, and he really liked the second one and had no major suggestions for improvement.
A professor (who writes a lot letters and has read many statements) said he really liked it, and offered no suggestions for improvement.
My third reviewer was a previous applicant with incredible writing skills, and I really respect her opinion. However, her response was that a good-sized chunk of it was "boring". I kind of agree, the topic is boring, but I'm oddly fond of it and have a hard time rewriting it (I know, probably breaks rule #1 in revising your own work).
Should I just call it a day and hope adcoms will read it like my first 2 reviewers, or keep pushing with it?
At what point did you all just say "good enough" and let it go? Did you do this in spite of someone suggesting you change it first?
One (premed advisor) basically said my first draft sucked, so I rewrote it. Sent it back, and he really liked the second one and had no major suggestions for improvement.
A professor (who writes a lot letters and has read many statements) said he really liked it, and offered no suggestions for improvement.
My third reviewer was a previous applicant with incredible writing skills, and I really respect her opinion. However, her response was that a good-sized chunk of it was "boring". I kind of agree, the topic is boring, but I'm oddly fond of it and have a hard time rewriting it (I know, probably breaks rule #1 in revising your own work).
Should I just call it a day and hope adcoms will read it like my first 2 reviewers, or keep pushing with it?
At what point did you all just say "good enough" and let it go? Did you do this in spite of someone suggesting you change it first?
Last edited: