The below mentioned statements cannot be generalised and exceptions are obviously always there so please dont start bullying me if you dont agree, Its just an opinion......
both the fields are similar in a way that
1. they involve diagnostics, clinicians are highly dependent on the judgement of pathologists as well as Radiologists.
2. Lifestyle! THough cannot be generalised, as a radiologist can be very busy in a private practice job and vice versa, but both have similar lifestyle.
3.$$$$$$$$, rads earn more but again both are diagnostic professions with better lifestyle and less running around as compared to clinical fields.
4. Use of technology, Technology plays important role in rads and path tooo, with new staining techniques, molecular pathology etc etc... technology is always a part of growth of both the fields.
They differ cos
Pathology deals with specimens and dead patients too(which sum ppl dont like) Rads is in a way better that way, 😉(no offense to anybody)
I can completely understand that one can be interested in both the fields as to me they seem similar, but yet to some they are widely apart.
Why dont you apply in both, there is no one who can stop you.