px, py, and pz corresponding to ml?

Discussion in 'MCAT Study Question Q&A' started by aviary17, May 27, 2008.

  1. aviary17

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2008
    Messages:
    63
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Pre-Medical
    Hi. Something I learned in high school once haunts me because I am not sure if it is true or not. Is it necessarily true that ml=-1 corresponds with px, 0 to py, and 1 to pz? Also, is it true that -1 (or px) fills first, meaning, for example, that ground-state Boron has an electron in the px orbital, but not the py or pz.

    Thanks :)
     
  2. Thread continues after this sponsor message. SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. fileserver

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2007
    Messages:
    52
    Likes Received:
    0
    The p orbitals should be degenerous? so I would guess that the electron can be in either 3. Idk plus I think it's too complicate to be on the MCAT. :)
     
  4. chemnerd31

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    79
    Likes Received:
    1
    Status:
    Pre-Medical
    It is true px, py, and pz are degenerate and therefore all have an equal chance of getting the electron. the x,y, and z are only put there for our convience so we can talk about a p orbital and the direction it is pointed but energeticall all are degenerate in a free atom.
     

Share This Page