- Joined
- Sep 10, 2003
- Messages
- 102
- Reaction score
- 0
I know most people like to correlate performance on q-bank to the real deal, but Ive been hearing some mixed up crazy stuff. People hitting 60-70s on Q come up with 230-240+ and some people who rock Q with 80s-90s get 210. Can someone explain the reasons?
I guess I am concerned with
1. Not psyching myself out with Q-bank, elevating hopes with high q-bank scores etc. OR not beating myself up for low q-bank scores.
2. Using Q-bank "correctly" to predict my score on the real thing (if that is possible)
Also have been hearing a lot of horror stories about good students bombing step 1. Not to set you guys off or anything, but thats the kind of stuff that gives me resting angina.
Thanks for the help.
Legion (reaching for the nitro)
I guess I am concerned with
1. Not psyching myself out with Q-bank, elevating hopes with high q-bank scores etc. OR not beating myself up for low q-bank scores.
2. Using Q-bank "correctly" to predict my score on the real thing (if that is possible)
Also have been hearing a lot of horror stories about good students bombing step 1. Not to set you guys off or anything, but thats the kind of stuff that gives me resting angina.
Thanks for the help.
Legion (reaching for the nitro)