- Joined
- Apr 5, 2008
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 1
To respect copyright I won't post the exact question, but problem 101 in Destroyer looks similar to the following and it asks to solve:
[(X-2)/3] >_ 5 "Absolute value of [(x-2)/3] is greater than or equal to 5"
The answer key said the way to solve this problem is to rewrite the inequality without the absolute value expression and change the sign on one of the inequalities. Basically, you end up with (x-2)/3 >_ 5 and (x-2)/3 _< -5. "(x-2)/3 is greater than or equal to 5, and (x-2)/3 is less than or equal to negative 5." Then you solve for x. Made sense, until I came to problem 150, which looks similar and asks for the solution set to a problem similar to the following:
[3x-5] >_ 9 "Absolute value of 3x-5 is greater than or equal to 9"
The answer key said the way to solve this problem, since it is greater than, is to use the formula [x]>_ a or [x]>_ -a. "Absolute value of x is greater than or equal to 'a' or absolute value of x is greater than or equal to negative 'a'."
These two problems look like the exact same set up to me, so how come you rewrite the first problem without absolute values, change the sign on one, and do two 'less than or equal to/greater than or equal to' inequalities, but on the second problem you keep the absolute values, change the sign on one, and do two 'greater than or equal to' inequalities?
Thanks for bearing with me. Sorry, I just can't figure this one out. Does anyone understand and would be willing to explain? It might be a simple answer, but then again most of the difficult problems have simple answers in the end. Thanks a ton!!
[(X-2)/3] >_ 5 "Absolute value of [(x-2)/3] is greater than or equal to 5"
The answer key said the way to solve this problem is to rewrite the inequality without the absolute value expression and change the sign on one of the inequalities. Basically, you end up with (x-2)/3 >_ 5 and (x-2)/3 _< -5. "(x-2)/3 is greater than or equal to 5, and (x-2)/3 is less than or equal to negative 5." Then you solve for x. Made sense, until I came to problem 150, which looks similar and asks for the solution set to a problem similar to the following:
[3x-5] >_ 9 "Absolute value of 3x-5 is greater than or equal to 9"
The answer key said the way to solve this problem, since it is greater than, is to use the formula [x]>_ a or [x]>_ -a. "Absolute value of x is greater than or equal to 'a' or absolute value of x is greater than or equal to negative 'a'."
These two problems look like the exact same set up to me, so how come you rewrite the first problem without absolute values, change the sign on one, and do two 'less than or equal to/greater than or equal to' inequalities, but on the second problem you keep the absolute values, change the sign on one, and do two 'greater than or equal to' inequalities?
Thanks for bearing with me. Sorry, I just can't figure this one out. Does anyone understand and would be willing to explain? It might be a simple answer, but then again most of the difficult problems have simple answers in the end. Thanks a ton!!