quality prelim/transitional programs

Started by xjohns1
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

xjohns1

SDN Angel
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
i'm about to apply to anesthesia and prelim/transitional programs. i have a few questions about prelim/transitional programs.

1. any thoughts on general advantages/disadvantages to doing prelim vs transitional year? is it purely personal preference? i'm almost sure i'll do a critical care fellowship following residency. would that affect how i should think about this?

2. it seems like many people are looking for relatively easy prelim/trans programs and that it is the cush ones that are most competetive. what about prelim/trans programs at schools that are well known for their medicine programs and difficult to match in, i.e., mass gen, u penn, uchicago, columbia, etc.? are these prelim/trans programs also difficult to get? and what does "difficult to get" mean for prelim/trans programs?

3. any suggestions to very good prelim/trans programs in chicago, boston, philadelphia, and nyc? i'd rather work a bit harder for a very good experience and a solid medicine background than coast through a super-cush first year.

4. are four-year anesthesia positions generally more sought-after than the three-plus-one positions?

i guess that's a lot to ask for, but i really haven't seen much good information about this topic and would really appreciate any insight. thanks!
 
xjohns1 said:
1. any thoughts on general advantages/disadvantages to doing prelim vs transitional year? is it purely personal preference? i'm almost sure i'll do a critical care fellowship following residency. would that affect how i should think about this?
some people will say that prelim medicine gives you a better foundation in IM, which makes the physiologic aspects of patient management easier. others will say that transitional programs provide you with a broader education, helping you brush up on peds, ob/gyn, and surgery. if you're dead set on critical care, prelim medicine might be a better choice for you.

2. it seems like many people are looking for relatively easy prelim/trans programs and that it is the cush ones that are most competetive. what about prelim/trans programs at schools that are well known for their medicine programs and difficult to match in, i.e., mass gen, u penn, uchicago, columbia, etc.? are these prelim/trans programs also difficult to get? and what does "difficult to get" mean for prelim/trans programs?
competitive programs for prelim/transitional are usually cush, or in a great location. don't really know about for schools that are well known for IM.

3. any suggestions to very good prelim/trans programs in chicago, boston, philadelphia, and nyc? i'd rather work a bit harder for a very good experience and a solid medicine background than coast through a super-cush first year.
i can only speak for chicago... programs that i would consider "cush" are st. francis (T>P), st. joseph (T>P), evanston northwestern (T or P), and macneal (T). programs where i think you would learn a lot are northwestern (P), U of C (P), UIC (P), rush (P), and loyola (P). i'd hazard that community programs (non-county) tend to be more "cush" while academic programs tend to have more learning.

4. are four-year anesthesia positions generally more sought-after than the three-plus-one positions?
not necessarily. some geographic areas don't even offer them (e.g. california). chicago programs tend to be split 50-50. it can be nice not having to move a second time, though, and it also helps you learn the system of the hospital where you'll be spending your residency.