- Joined
- Feb 6, 2014
- Messages
- 126
- Reaction score
- 50
This is in reference to US News which shows # interviewed and # accepted at most schools.
Let's say a school interviews 200 people.
Of those, 50 are accepted outright, 100 are waitlisted, and 50 are rejected post interview.
Let's say that of the 100 who are waitlisted, 50 eventually withdraw due to acceptances elsewhere.
And then 25-50 or so are eventually accepted from the waitlist.
Given this, couldn't you say that the post interview acceptance rate is therefore higher than just dividing the total number accepted over the total number interviewed, because the post-interview applicant pool actually shrinks due to people withdrawing from the waitlist?
Let's say a school interviews 200 people.
Of those, 50 are accepted outright, 100 are waitlisted, and 50 are rejected post interview.
Let's say that of the 100 who are waitlisted, 50 eventually withdraw due to acceptances elsewhere.
And then 25-50 or so are eventually accepted from the waitlist.
Given this, couldn't you say that the post interview acceptance rate is therefore higher than just dividing the total number accepted over the total number interviewed, because the post-interview applicant pool actually shrinks due to people withdrawing from the waitlist?