They really should show both. Averages of accepted and matriculated. Somehow I imagine that they do that to discourage applicants to apply to their schools (because they get enough as it is)...
This is good news. I'm somewhat encouraged. I mean for example NYMC shows an average of 30. But it is supposedly a notorious "backup school", i.e., a lot of mid-upper 30's also apply there and are accepted but don't matriculate...
Do the math. Many 35-37's apply to mid/low-tier schools as backups. They get accepted, but end up going to a "higher tier" school. If the average acceptant had a 30 mcat - driven up by the 35-37's - the average matriculant has to be lower.
that makes real good sense. so we should assume that the MCAT scores in the MSAR are probally about 1-3 points higher than the acutal MCAT scores of matriculated students? This is for schools outside the top 20 im assuming
willow18 said:
Do the math. Many 35-37's apply to mid/low-tier schools as backups. They get accepted, but end up going to a "higher tier" school. If the average acceptant had a 30 mcat - driven up by the 35-37's - the average matriculant has to be lower.