Question about carbohydrate rings and enthalpy

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
D

deleted647690

There was a question in TBR:

The difference in the enthalpies of combustion for xylose (an aldopentose) and ribose (an aldopentose) can best be attributed to:

The Answer was steric repulsion in the furanose ring.

I have some questions regarding their answer explanation.

First, I can't remember, but are the main carbohydrate sugars (glucose, galactose, ribose, fructose) generally more stable in the ring form or straight chain form?


In their explanation, they say, "The repulsion experienced by the eclipsed hydroxyl groups in the five-membered ring appears in the enthalpy of reaction. As the repulsion within a molecule increases, the molecule is said to be less stable, and thus it will have a greater enthalpy of reaction (more heat released when the ring steric hindrance in the reactant is relieved)"


So I'm trying to imagine the rxn coordinate diagram, so would it just be an exothermic reaction starting from the ring and proceeding to the straight chain form?
Therefore, the straight chain is more stable. This would align with their explanation when they say heat is released as the ring converted to the straight chain form.

2.png



So the ring would be reactants, and the straight chain would be the more stable products?

Members don't see this ad.
 
The process they are talking about here is not ring-opening but rather combustion. So you're basically fragmenting and oxidizing everything in the ring. It's different but the key is that it destroys the ring. Their main point here is that if you have an unstable ring, this means your reactants are higher in energy. Raising the reactants in energy increases the delta H of the reaction as you can easily see from a reaction coordinate diagram.
 
The process they are talking about here is not ring-opening but rather combustion. So you're basically fragmenting and oxidizing everything in the ring. It's different but the key is that it destroys the ring. Their main point here is that if you have an unstable ring, this means your reactants are higher in energy. Raising the reactants in energy increases the delta H of the reaction as you can easily see from a reaction coordinate diagram.

Thank you! In regards to normal ring opening, does my explanation still suffice? With the carbohydrates (glucose, fructose, galactose, ribose), are the straight chain forms normally preferred due to lower enthalpy and thus higher stability vs. the closed ring forms?
 
Thank you! In regards to normal ring opening, does my explanation still suffice? With the carbohydrates (glucose, fructose, galactose, ribose), are the straight chain forms normally preferred due to lower enthalpy and thus higher stability vs. the closed ring forms?

Not exactly. Carbs like glucose prefer the ring form. There's an extra bond that isn't there in the ring form - you have several competing factors here. Linear form has more entropy and fewer eclipsing interactions but also fewer bonds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Top