So after watching Ari's video on Pattern folding on his DAT BC site, I found that a few of the sample questions he does are incredibly easy. I looked in the Kaplan book and found the same things.
Some of the shapes/sides in the answer choices aren't even found in the original question. That's incredibly easy and takes 20 seconds. Now the actual generator questions are extremely difficult and take me roughly 4 minutes each. And i'll still miss 50%. Which is a more accurate representation?? The ones where shapes aren't even in the original question, or incredibly hard ones where they all look the same?
Also, can someone please explain the "rocks" in the pattern folding? Any sites explaining or otherwise would be extremely helpful. Thanks!
Some of the shapes/sides in the answer choices aren't even found in the original question. That's incredibly easy and takes 20 seconds. Now the actual generator questions are extremely difficult and take me roughly 4 minutes each. And i'll still miss 50%. Which is a more accurate representation?? The ones where shapes aren't even in the original question, or incredibly hard ones where they all look the same?
Also, can someone please explain the "rocks" in the pattern folding? Any sites explaining or otherwise would be extremely helpful. Thanks!