- Joined
- Nov 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,355
- Reaction score
- 2,887
Seeing if anybody immersed in this space can point me towards some of the research on effectiveness of different training/teaching approaches with respect to manualized protocols (e.g., CBT for Chronic Pain) as well as specific treatments (DBT for BPD).
In particular, I have been wondering if there's any good research on effectiveness/efficacy of taking more rigid & more fidelity-focused approaches to teaching/introducing protocols to new therapists (e.g., not using a certain type of specific language in a protocol = not in fidelity).
So kind of a fluid intelligence/principle-based teaching approach versus crystalized intelligence/task-focused teaching approach to put the question differently? Thanks in advance!
In particular, I have been wondering if there's any good research on effectiveness/efficacy of taking more rigid & more fidelity-focused approaches to teaching/introducing protocols to new therapists (e.g., not using a certain type of specific language in a protocol = not in fidelity).
So kind of a fluid intelligence/principle-based teaching approach versus crystalized intelligence/task-focused teaching approach to put the question differently? Thanks in advance!