- Joined
- Apr 12, 2015
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 42
I'm a little confused on a question from TPR. This was from one of their exams.
"According to Noam Chomsky, children learn all their vocabulary:"
A. solely from universal grammar
B. from a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors.
C. solely from environmental factors such as parents and teachers reading to them from an early age
D. from a genetic predisposition to good reading and vocabulary skills
I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly. So Chomsky is involved with the Nativist approach to language development (children are born with a "language acquisition device", they have universal grammar, etc.). I didn't pick A because it said "solely" (too extreme). I automatically crossed off B and C because Chomsky didn't have anything to do with the environment. I picked D and apparently that was the wrong answer.
TPR's answer was B: "Chomsky strongly believed that a complex interaction of genetics and environmental factors were involved in building children's vocabularies."
Do you guys agree with this reasoning? Just a little confused...
"According to Noam Chomsky, children learn all their vocabulary:"
A. solely from universal grammar
B. from a complex interaction of genetic and environmental factors.
C. solely from environmental factors such as parents and teachers reading to them from an early age
D. from a genetic predisposition to good reading and vocabulary skills
I'm not sure if I'm understanding this correctly. So Chomsky is involved with the Nativist approach to language development (children are born with a "language acquisition device", they have universal grammar, etc.). I didn't pick A because it said "solely" (too extreme). I automatically crossed off B and C because Chomsky didn't have anything to do with the environment. I picked D and apparently that was the wrong answer.
TPR's answer was B: "Chomsky strongly believed that a complex interaction of genetics and environmental factors were involved in building children's vocabularies."
Do you guys agree with this reasoning? Just a little confused...