- Joined
- Jul 6, 2006
- Messages
- 585
- Reaction score
- 459
- Points
- 5,156
- Attending Physician
Patient comes in, large HTX, shattered all of his ribs, and his HIV and HCV positive.
During exploration, how do you avoid stabbing your finger on a broken piece of rib in this case? Go slow? Double glove? Anything more scientific than that?
Sticky situation. I like Fox's answer. I got a needlestick this year, from an otherwise fairly healthy woman. That sucked, but I can;t imagine knowing if the patient already has HIV/HCV
I've poked myself before. Never a 'questionable' case, and never with a hollow-bore needle, but still - had to get baseline seroconversion yadda yadda on me and source. Made me think.
The academic discussion here is: why even sweep the pleura with your finger ? Who cares ? Put the damn tube in.
The other thing is that in blunt chest injury with a HTX you may not be able to see on a plain film if there is an elevated hemidiaphragm or diaphragmatic disruption with something in the way that you don't want to put a tube or kelly etc. through.
I've poked myself before. Never a 'questionable' case, and never with a hollow-bore needle, but still - had to get baseline seroconversion yadda yadda on me and source. Made me think.
The academic discussion here is: why even sweep the pleura with your finger ? Who cares ? Put the damn tube in.

Also consider changing the location of your chest tube site to someplace less traumatic. If it's for a hemothorax, you just want a large tube in, pointed downward. Doesn't have to be mid-axillary line. Not a hard & fast rule. You can put them more anterior or posterior. Higher or lower.Good point... but that's why you're (we're?) taught to aim high with the chest tube; to minimize the chance of anything like that happening. Hit the nipple line and aim for their ipsilateral tonsil.
I think sweeping the finger is important to:Question remains... why sweep w/ finger ?
this has come up in my ED when it comes to trying to drain an abscess in the arm. a resident pressed down to express the remaining pus and the remainder of a hypodermic needle (that started the abscess to begin with--pt said it was a pimple she'd popped) poked him in the finger. he ended up being fine but it was a great reminder that using your fingers, even if gloved, carries risk.
I think sweeping the finger is important to:
A) Ensure you're IN the hemithorax, and not in the chest wall (yes, people have put chest tubes through the chest wall, vs. in the pleural space
B) Ensure the structure you're feeling is actually the lung (you can miss a diaphragmatic injury, and if that lung isn't moving, it may not be lung you're chest tube's heading toward (I've seen chest tubes placed into the stomach due to an unknown hiatal hernia)
C) Now that you know it's lung, you want to make sure the lung is NOT adhered to the thoracic wall. You want to put the chest tube into the pleural space, and not into the lung ITSELF lol. Bad. Bad.
No worries 🙂Disclaimer: I'm not arguing with you. I'm trying to brainstorm ways for us to save our fingers from danger.
Yes, but unless this is a trauma, where I'm slicing & dicing anyway, I prefer the smallest hole I need to get by with - which is finger-sized. Don't really see at all; just do by feel (which doesn't help your very valid concern).A) A big enough incision should be able to suffice. If you can't get a good return of something, then you're not in the pleural cavity. Stick the large kellys in there, OPEN them, and take a good, square look.
Yep. But it happens nonetheless.B) In theory, a chest tube placed 'high enough' shouldn't hit anything but lung.
I'd be careful what you do and how much of it you do blindly. Kellys are blunt, but can still lacerate the lung. And especially on left chest tubes on small patients, you BARELY want that Kelly in there. Cuz you know what's *RIGHT NEXT* to the chest wall? The heart. And many a chest have been opened up emergently secondary to someone being not as careful as they needed to be when trying to puncture the pleura with the Kellys (if you don't limit how much it goes it, it'll do just that: GO IN. Far lol).C) Closed kellys *should* be able to sweep away lung adhered to the pleura, as well.
Not at all man. Didn't take it that way 🙂Again. I don't want to sound confrontational - I want someone to debunk my thoughts, if there's a GOOD reason why a kelly clamp just won't do.
Patient comes in, large HTX, shattered all of his ribs, and his HIV and HCV positive.
During exploration, how do you avoid stabbing your finger on a broken piece of rib in this case? Go slow? Double glove? Anything more scientific than that?
Lacerating the lung... yeah... Kellys are blunt, but can still do some damage. Can you think of another (softer?) object that we can slide in there in lieu of our finger to sweep away the lung ? I'm all for keeping my fingers out of there if I at all can.
Gooood idea.
If there's any way to protect my fingers, I'm all for it.
Patient comes in, large HTX, shattered all of his ribs, and his HIV and HCV positive.
During exploration, how do you avoid stabbing your finger on a broken piece of rib in this case? Go slow? Double glove? Anything more scientific than that?
this has come up in my ED when it comes to trying to drain an abscess in the arm. a resident pressed down to express the remaining pus and the remainder of a hypodermic needle (that started the abscess to begin with--pt said it was a pimple she'd popped) poked him in the finger. he ended up being fine but it was a great reminder that using your fingers, even if gloved, carries risk.
We could sue our patients over cases like this. Perhaps we should.
Busy as heck. It's insane. But great for training ;-) I threw up my $0.02 of my experience @ York here: http://forums.studentdoctor.net/showthread.php?t=771538 if you want some more details.FDNewbie: Hey man, how's York these days? (I'm a Pennsylvania boy)
Sounds good. I actually use my right hand to push (I'm right handed), and my left hand against the chest wall, almost applying counter pressure against my right hand. That way, I can limit how far in the Kelly goes, once I puncture the pleura.You bring up some good points. One thing I'd like to say is that when I'm puncturing the pleura with the kelly, I use TWO hands; my right hand is applying pressure with the kelly to puncture, and my left hand is on the chest wall also applying pressure with the kelly... this way, I "push" at two points, and can control the kelly better than I could by just pushing with one hand at the handle-end of the kelly. I've found that this results in a far more 'controlled entry'.
I like Daiphon's idea!Lacerating the lung... yeah... Kellys are blunt, but can still do some damage. Can you think of another (softer?) object that we can slide in there in lieu of our finger to sweep away the lung ? I'm all for keeping my fingers out of there if I at all can.
What would happen if a cop got poked by a needle while searching someone? I'm betting the perp would get charged w/ assault w/ a deadly weapon or something along those lines, maybe a similar standard should apply for medical professionals.Imagine the payout you're going to score from the junkie with half a broken needle in his shooting arm abscess.
But your point is interesting.
How about using the ortho surgical gloves. A lot stronger than even double gloving...
Sounds like a great idea. But I can tell ya from my personal experience, some pleuras are VERY tough and *required* two hands.As for the Kelly technique thing... I usually use one hand, but I grab the kelly mid portion, place thumb over the amount of depth I want to push through, and shove... That way when the resistance is gone, my thumb catches the subq and chest wall and prevents the Kelly from puncturing lung. Works for me.
As for the Kelly technique thing... I usually use one hand, but I grab the kelly mid portion, place thumb over the amount of depth I want to push through, and shove... That way when the resistance is gone, my thumb catches the subq and chest wall and prevents the Kelly from puncturing lung. Works for me.