You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Step I question re:suing
Started by MissMedicine
ok i am confused.. wasnt there a similar qbank question and the answer was she got breast cancer...or am i remembering wrong.
ok i am confused...she would still sue if she didnt end up having breast cancer? and how is this a communication issue? it sounds like competency to me?
ok i am confused...she would still sue if she didnt end up having breast cancer? and how is this a communication issue? it sounds like competency to me?
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
According to most sources, most lawsuits occur as a direct (or indirect depending on how you look at it) consequence of a poor doctor/patient relationship.
Also, due to this reasoning, we now have a standardized clinical skills exam to take after our 3rd year 😡
Also, due to this reasoning, we now have a standardized clinical skills exam to take after our 3rd year 😡
ok so lets say in clinical trials misses a fatal/serious SE of a drug.
is it bc :
the subjects of the clinical trial were healthy
there werent enough subjects to catch a rare event
is it bc :
the subjects of the clinical trial were healthy
there werent enough subjects to catch a rare event
Stinger86 said:According to most sources, most lawsuits occur as a direct (or indirect depending on how you look at it) consequence of a poor doctor/patient relationship.
Yes, but it also requires a bad outcome (like breast cancer). If there is an abnormal mammogram, but it turns out just to be a benign lump, I'd say she's much less likely to sue then if she had terminal breast cancer, regardless of communication.
yea, i remember a very similar qbank question and i think the answer was bad outcome? no?
why would you sue if you didnt end up having breast cancer?
why would you sue if you didnt end up having breast cancer?
The writers of the question are driving home the point that most lawsuits are a result of BAD COMMUNICATION... doctors with good communication skills have the least # of suits brought against them
MissMedicine said:yea, i remember a very similar qbank question and i think the answer was bad outcome? no?
why would you sue if you didnt end up having breast cancer?
Sledge2005 said:Yes, but it also requires a bad outcome (like breast cancer). If there is an abnormal mammogram, but it turns out just to be a benign lump, I'd say she's much less likely to sue then if she had terminal breast cancer, regardless of communication.
Right, but the point is that if there is a strong doctor/patient relationship, the chance of any kind of medical lawsuit is reasonably decreased. At least, that's what we're being taught.
And besides, who knows what a person will sue a doctor over? But you can at least know that a patient who has a good relationship with her doctor will be less likely to sue for anything in the future than a patient who didn't have a good relationship with her doctor.
Stinger86 said:And besides, who knows what a person will sue a doctor over? But you can at least know that a patient who has a good relationship with her doctor will be less likely to sue for anything in the future than a patient who didn't have a good relationship with her doctor.
Exactly! Its quite possible that someone has sued a doctor for the "emotionally draining routine" of a mammogram which turned out 👍
Similar threads
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 3K