• Practice your interview with the new SDN AI Interview Coach. Choose a school, answer by voice or typing, and receive a personalized feedback report. Available now to all SDN members. Try the AI Interview Coach.

Question regarding Midlevel Oversight and Billing

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

hopefulgasman

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I am a soon to be new attending and had some questions regarding the utilization of midlevels.

The practice I will be joining requires that I see new patients, however, I will have at least one NP to see patients as well. I am in a bonus based off of collections model, so analyzing these details is obviously important.

If the NP sees all of the return visit patients including writing their notes and I am the MD in-house providing oversight -

1. Do I get paid at all for the patients they see?
2. Do I get any compensation for the patients they see, especially as they run ideas/plans by me?
3. After their note is written, does part of the process involve me reading their notes and signing them? Is there potential for me to get paid by doing this?
4. My concern is, as I begin to ramp up, I want to make sure my days are full and might want to see as many return visits as possible, especially if it means doing a much better job of identifying/recommending procedures than them.
 
you get what you negotiate for.

I believe some of the docs here are in a model where they get credit for all their midlevel's wRVUs.

I'll be interested to see the responses. my group gets no additional value from the midlevels (aside from increasing our procedure volume), yet we have to co-sign all of their notes.
 
you are just starting out and the group's NP is going to take a substantial amount of your volume from under you?
bye bye bonus potential

good luck seeing 30 new patients a day lol
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
you should not be able to bill for the NP patients unless you directly see the patients themselves.

you can negotiate and get a percent of the billing that the NPs generate.

you should be seeing as many new patients as possible and setting up initial injections.

NPs should be for follow ups on MBB and when to go to MBB#2 or RFA, follow up on prior ESI and when to repeat if necessary, etc.



i get 5% of all the NP's wRVUs. i do not have to cosign any notes.
 
a great way to never get an RFs is to let the NPs see the MBB f/u.

these are easy 99213/4 and you can steer them better to RF.

extenders are for the patients you dont really want to see, interpreter patients, patients you havent seen in a while but still want a shot and need to be evaluated, patients who have no imaging, ER referrals, etc.
 
a great way to never get an RFs is to let the NPs see the MBB f/u.

these are easy 99213/4 and you can steer them better to RF.

extenders are for the patients you dont really want to see, interpreter patients, patients you havent seen in a while but still want a shot and need to be evaluated, patients who have no imaging, ER referrals, etc.

Agree with this. Don’t have the NP see the MBB f/u.

Also agree the best use of mid levels is to see the patients you don’t want to see.
 
So I pay for my APPS and get 100% of their collections.
Worth it. However, it does add more to the overhead in terms of MA hours


All practices are different. Even if you don’t get their billing, they help tee up procedures