Rad Onc Twitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter deleted1002574
  • Start date Start date
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
The funny thing about this forum is that someone can do the empathy and put themselves in the shoes some hired gun insurance company employee, but when it comes to academic residencies and chairmen, they are automatically greedy/evil/exploitative and any of the choices that have been made are because of their personal character deficiencies
Definitely. Becoming an academic chair takes a career's worth of work, and then they hold that position for 20+ years. It's not a position you take when your back is against the wall.

No one has ever said: "My group lost its hospital contract, the only job I could find was this academic chair job. How many residents do we have again?"
 
Palex, as usual you are absolutely on point. I don't like insurance MDs either but we have to admit that they play a vital regulatory role in not allowing m0ronic and/or dinosaur radoncs from milking the system for their own benefit. We seem to conveniently forget that if it weren't for insurance MDs, there'd be a hell lot more 15-25 fractions for bone mets, conventional fractionation for WBI, and 40-45 fractions of protons for prostate. I know no one on SDN who would do that sort of nonsense, but I never underestimate other idiot radoncs to do things like that.
I've done consulting work for insurance companies and the sheer number of bogus requests for treatment is breathtaking. It's a bubble here on SDN with everyone hypofractionating every breast and prostate, single fraction palliation, etc. That's not what happens in the real world. I've seen networks without Evicore-type oversite and the boomers and academic docs were going ham with IMRT. Obviously I can't get too specific, but there was one reasonably well known breast person who was IMRTing every single breast cancer 30+ fractions even low risk, right-sided, >70 types. Majority of palliative cases were getting 20 fraction IMRT. One of my favorites was a lymphoma expert at a very expensive academic center getting 7-10x medicare who insisted on IMRT for boom boom palliation.
 
Maybe I'm alone in this, but it strikes me that many (if not most) peer to peer reviews I do are with docs who are actively working clinically.

Sometimes you hear the nurses yelling at them to come see patients.
 
Maybe I'm alone in this, but it strikes me that many (if not most) peer to peer reviews I do are with docs who are actively working clinically.

Sometimes you hear the nurses yelling at them to come see patients
A decent chunk of the ones I've talked to are no longer active clinically, usually not by choice, despite Dr Spratts insinuations. The one thing evilcore offers above all else is geographic flexibility.

Reasons I've heard of or seen include health reasons, being kicked out of a group/not making partner with a non compete in place etc
 
Last edited:
I hear you, and I'm definitely not talking about folks who go to eviCore as "Option A".

@RickyScott's story is a perfect example. Say your group loses the contract with the hospital, hires someone else. Maybe you have a few kids, one's a sophomore in high school, the other is a junior. Your spouse has a career in the city, but their income alone probably won't cut it. Maybe you're an immigrant or a first generation citizen and you have family depending on your support in another country.

Your youngest kid (the sophomore) has 3 years left to go in the school system they've been in their whole life. You have roots in that area, perhaps a large family network as well. Do you just turn everyone's world upside down and immediately to try to get a clinical job elsewhere? Or do you try to stick it out for a couple years for your family? You cast a wide net and try to get outside the box, but you can't find anything that will pay you more than maybe 20% of the income you've been making for years. At that point, I imagine eviCore is an attractive option - but I also imagine you're going to try to not stay in that job forever.

All I'm saying is that life is complicated and it's impossible to understand all the motivations behind someone's actions. If I needed to urgently move back home to help out my dying Mom, and the only way I could financially make that happen is to take a temporary job at eviCore where my decisions might harm someone else's dying Mom...I know which Mom I'm choosing, and I know it's the same choice 90%+ of people would make as well.

The universe is cruel, we try to do the best we can. But the best laid plans of mice and men oft go astray. I think it's wise to not use cheap heuristics that "doc working for eviCore --> lazy, incompetent, only cares about the money". It's tribalism, and is similar to academicians claiming community docs are inferior in both their ability and aspirations.

(and to be clear, I remain a Dan Spratt fan, I just don't agree with this particular Tweet/opinion)

You've stated your position well, and I understand where you are coming from. However, I still 100% have Dan's back on this. I also appreciate your honesty about valuing your own family's life over those of strangers. That's rare for someone to say what we all know to be true in this age of virtue signalling.

We have all undoubtedly watched Evicore shave precious months and years off our patients' lives unnecessarily to save insurance a few bucks. My position that it is not conscionable to work for them under any circumstance. There is a difference between simply putting food on your family's table and trying to maintain your current lifestyle of spending $200k+/year and not having to move somewhere less desirable to do it. A licensed MD can make $100k a year through MANY different avenues in a large city. Sure, it may be harder to make the $200k+ level that Evicore will pay, but that is exactly why people do it. They don't want some clinic oversight babysitting job because it only pays $100k. That's why it's not ok.

In my experience with Evicore docs, they are often part or full-time employed at academic centers and schedule the peer review calls around THEIR workday to pad their income. Revolting. And to the other point above, sometimes it is appropriate to do >10 fraction IMRT palliation. A recent pancreatic met I had comes to mind. As did a rare case of colorectal brain mets, which has evidence for dose escalating with conventional frac. On the other hand, I have seen people give 0.5 Gy/day for prostate over a period of many many months. That does happen, but it's not as common as the above comment suggests I think. I am confident the counter scenario (Evicore denying care inappropriately) is far more common that fraudulent fractionation schemes.

The reality that a lot of you are not going to like to hear is that your plight is not going to garner much sympathy in the eyes of the general public. Your choices are to stay in an exploitative job in southern California making $250k/year with no opportunity for advancement or have to uproot your family and move to whoever's hiring in rural Wyoming/Kansas/Nebraska or one of the perma-hiring rural places in Wisconsin and bring in $700k/year.

I do hear what you all are saying about Dan's bias, and I will fully admit that I am coming at this as a position of bias as well with no family of my own and total freedom to go whereever and do whatever I want. However, I am also aware that there are many thousands of FMGs practicing overseas for well under $100k chomping at the bit to come and take literally any other job in America knowing full well that it means they will get to see their family across the world once every two years via a 40 hour $5000 round trip.

Something to think about. Hope Dan comes here to engage.

5c8a52.jpg
 
It is a race to the bottom. With limited resources, come desperate solutions. When the breadlines come things will be terrible for many with financial and marital ruin on the line and people will claw at any opportunity to avoid this. Greedy academic “leader” chairs will take their opportunity, aka the hallahan final solution, to low ball people even more and take advantage of people while living in 5M dollar penthouses fraction shaming while giving IMPT prostates 1.8 a day with standard fx, virtue signalling, equivocating and speaking general nonsense. The best of times are yet to come (for a few), and the worst of times are yet to come for many. When the dust settles, the ashes cool down, it will be all quiet on the western front, BUT it will be abundantly clear who is culpable.
 
Last edited:
One major difference between SDN and #radonc Twitter is that on Twitter you only get 280 characters for your drivel. On SDN, you can use as many characters as you want to say absolutely nothing.

Edit: Not necessarily in reference to carbon's comment.

2nd edit:. Possibly referring to the comment immediately preceding carbon's.
 
Last edited:
You've stated your position well, and I understand where you are coming from. However, I still 100% have Dan's back on this. I also appreciate your honesty about valuing your own family's life over those of strangers. That's rare for someone to say what we all know to be true in this age of virtue signalling.

We have all undoubtedly watched Evicore shave precious months and years off our patients' lives unnecessarily to save insurance a few bucks. My position that it is not conscionable to work for them under any circumstance. There is a difference between simply putting food on your family's table and trying to maintain your current lifestyle of spending $200k+/year and not having to move somewhere less desirable to do it. A licensed MD can make $100k a year through MANY different avenues in a large city. Sure, it may be harder to make the $200k+ level that Evicore will pay, but that is exactly why people do it. They don't want some clinic oversight babysitting job because it only pays $100k. That's why it's not ok.

In my experience with Evicore docs, they are often part or full-time employed at academic centers and schedule the peer review calls around THEIR workday to pad their income. Revolting. And to the other point above, sometimes it is appropriate to do >10 fraction IMRT palliation. A recent pancreatic met I had comes to mind. As did a rare case of colorectal brain mets, which has evidence for dose escalating with conventional frac. On the other hand, I have seen people give 0.5 Gy/day for prostate over a period of many many months. That does happen, but it's not as common as the above comment suggests I think. I am confident the counter scenario (Evicore denying care inappropriately) is far more common that fraudulent fractionation schemes.

The reality that a lot of you are not going to like to hear is that your plight is not going to garner much sympathy in the eyes of the general public. Your choices are to stay in an exploitative job in southern California making $250k/year with no opportunity for advancement or have to uproot your family and move to whoever's hiring in rural Wyoming/Kansas/Nebraska or one of the perma-hiring rural places in Wisconsin and bring in $700k/year.

I do hear what you all are saying about Dan's bias, and I will fully admit that I am coming at this as a position of bias as well with no family of my own and total freedom to go whereever and do whatever I want. However, I am also aware that there are many thousands of FMGs practicing overseas for well under $100k chomping at the bit to come and take literally any other job in America knowing full well that it means they will get to see their family across the world once every two years via a 40 hour $5000 round trip.

Something to think about. Hope Dan comes here to engage.

5c8a52.jpg


You and Dan are incorrect on this. I've seen physicians make terrible decisions and also limit the lifespan of patients, happens way way way more frequently than people allow themselves to see. As tertiary treaters we all know this. The medical system is itself an abhorrent system, just bc the people that work in it under the pretense that they want to do good does not mean they are doing so. Laziness, sloppiness, being incredibly busy, or just not knowing an answer can all account for this. And when you get subpar treatment from physicians/nurses/PAs etc you still pay for it, there is no way around that, literally the system will force you to pay.

If someone needs to work for Evicore to make things work out in their lives so be it, whatever Dan thinks and you think are simply misguided noise.
 
Last edited:
You've stated your position well, and I understand where you are coming from. However, I still 100% have Dan's back on this. I also appreciate your honesty about valuing your own family's life over those of strangers. That's rare for someone to say what we all know to be true in this age of virtue signalling.

We have all undoubtedly watched Evicore shave precious months and years off our patients' lives unnecessarily to save insurance a few bucks. My position that it is not conscionable to work for them under any circumstance. There is a difference between simply putting food on your family's table and trying to maintain your current lifestyle of spending $200k+/year and not having to move somewhere less desirable to do it. A licensed MD can make $100k a year through MANY different avenues in a large city. Sure, it may be harder to make the $200k+ level that Evicore will pay, but that is exactly why people do it. They don't want some clinic oversight babysitting job because it only pays $100k. That's why it's not ok.

In my experience with Evicore docs, they are often part or full-time employed at academic centers and schedule the peer review calls around THEIR workday to pad their income. Revolting. And to the other point above, sometimes it is appropriate to do >10 fraction IMRT palliation. A recent pancreatic met I had comes to mind. As did a rare case of colorectal brain mets, which has evidence for dose escalating with conventional frac. On the other hand, I have seen people give 0.5 Gy/day for prostate over a period of many many months. That does happen, but it's not as common as the above comment suggests I think. I am confident the counter scenario (Evicore denying care inappropriately) is far more common that fraudulent fractionation schemes.

The reality that a lot of you are not going to like to hear is that your plight is not going to garner much sympathy in the eyes of the general public. Your choices are to stay in an exploitative job in southern California making $250k/year with no opportunity for advancement or have to uproot your family and move to whoever's hiring in rural Wyoming/Kansas/Nebraska or one of the perma-hiring rural places in Wisconsin and bring in $700k/year.

I do hear what you all are saying about Dan's bias, and I will fully admit that I am coming at this as a position of bias as well with no family of my own and total freedom to go whereever and do whatever I want. However, I am also aware that there are many thousands of FMGs practicing overseas for well under $100k chomping at the bit to come and take literally any other job in America knowing full well that it means they will get to see their family across the world once every two years via a 40 hour $5000 round trip.

Something to think about. Hope Dan comes here to engage.

5c8a52.jpg
Clearly a bachelor and very out of touch
 
Clearly a bachelor and very out of touch
Ah yeah, we're wandering into economic territory where emotions get hot (what is a "good" salary etc).

For me, personally, I come from a relatively poor background. When I was younger, I absolutely COULD NOT imagine anyone making $100k a year and not being wealthy. I thought basically anyone making $80k+ a year was set.

...and maybe that's true, if you don't incur debt from college, live in an affordable area, and only need to take care of yourself. But, as we all know, the entrance price to medicine is steep. If you don't have family help or get a scholarship, you're going several hundred thousand dollars into debt. Your life still moves on, so maybe you get married, maybe you have kids. If your spouse comes from a wealthy family or has a high-paying career, great! If not, ouch.

Even if you're frugal and play your cards right, chances are you become an attending (and get an attending's salary) in your late 20s/early 30s. Maybe you have a spouse, maybe a kid or two. Now you can finally tackle that debt! But, maybe you also FINALLY want to own your own home, or start saving towards retirement. All possible with an average RadOnc starting salary.

As long as nothing goes wrong, as long as your group doesn't lose its hospital contract, as long as you or someone in your family doesn't get seriously ill and racks up insane hospital bills, as long as...well, really any economic disaster doesn't befall you or your loved ones.

To be honest, I'm basically spelling out my current situation. I have a ton of debt. My family is poor. My spouse doesn't make much money. My deferments on loans are about to end. Fortunately, my attending paycheck is practically in the mail. I can pull this off, because I'm fortunate enough to be making an average RadOnc starting salary.

However, if I lose this job in a year...getting a $100k/year job isn't going to cut it (unless I can put loans back into forbearance). I've done the math, I know this is true. If I lose this job in a year, and the only job I can get which pays me enough to keep my head above water is with an insurance company...I'm going to that insurance company. I'll keep looking, but my family depends on me.

I think this is probably why Dan's post rubbed me the wrong way this morning. The past few months have been just incredibly stressful for me as I try to figure out how to financially swing the transition of graduating residency and establishing myself in a new job hundreds of miles away. The timing of paychecks and reimbursements and bills has been, at times, more stressful than boards. Then I look over at some of my friends, and their parents are just cooly wiring $75k at a drop of a hat.

Yeah, if my Dad could throw 100 racks at me if I called him, I probably would have breezed over that Tweet and not thought twice.
 
You've stated your position well, and I understand where you are coming from. However, I still 100% have Dan's back on this. I also appreciate your honesty about valuing your own family's life over those of strangers. That's rare for someone to say what we all know to be true in this age of virtue signalling.

We have all undoubtedly watched Evicore shave precious months and years off our patients' lives unnecessarily to save insurance a few bucks. My position that it is not conscionable to work for them under any circumstance. There is a difference between simply putting food on your family's table and trying to maintain your current lifestyle of spending $200k+/year and not having to move somewhere less desirable to do it. A licensed MD can make $100k a year through MANY different avenues in a large city. Sure, it may be harder to make the $200k+ level that Evicore will pay, but that is exactly why people do it. They don't want some clinic oversight babysitting job because it only pays $100k. That's why it's not ok.

In my experience with Evicore docs, they are often part or full-time employed at academic centers and schedule the peer review calls around THEIR workday to pad their income. Revolting. And to the other point above, sometimes it is appropriate to do >10 fraction IMRT palliation. A recent pancreatic met I had comes to mind. As did a rare case of colorectal brain mets, which has evidence for dose escalating with conventional frac. On the other hand, I have seen people give 0.5 Gy/day for prostate over a period of many many months. That does happen, but it's not as common as the above comment suggests I think. I am confident the counter scenario (Evicore denying care inappropriately) is far more common that fraudulent fractionation schemes.

The reality that a lot of you are not going to like to hear is that your plight is not going to garner much sympathy in the eyes of the general public. Your choices are to stay in an exploitative job in southern California making $250k/year with no opportunity for advancement or have to uproot your family and move to whoever's hiring in rural Wyoming/Kansas/Nebraska or one of the perma-hiring rural places in Wisconsin and bring in $700k/year.

I do hear what you all are saying about Dan's bias, and I will fully admit that I am coming at this as a position of bias as well with no family of my own and total freedom to go whereever and do whatever I want. However, I am also aware that there are many thousands of FMGs practicing overseas for well under $100k chomping at the bit to come and take literally any other job in America knowing full well that it means they will get to see their family across the world once every two years via a 40 hour $5000 round trip.

Something to think about. Hope Dan comes here to engage.

5c8a52.jpg

This type of goodie two shoes mentality is the reason why physicians salaries will continue to decline in the future and why NPs/PAs replace us

people shouldn’t be derided for desiring proper compensation while living wherever they wish

if the better option for ones personal situation is evicore then take it. We know none of us would choose that as primary option if job market remained or returned to peak IMRT radonc

last I checked that goal is what makes us American
 
This type of goodie two shoes mentality is the reason why physicians salaries will continue to decline in the future and why NPs/PAs replace us

people shouldn’t be derided for desiring proper compensation while living wherever they wish

last I checked that goal is what makes us American
Yip. Favorite twitter geezer almost certainly graduated with no debt, was an attending with a lab by his late 20s, bought a house in desirable metro for 50k. Now screams “greed” at anyone with 300k debt, and in late 30s who is not willing to be his post doc.

several docs who work for evercore are under 60 and mskcc and Yale grads, including one who has been called out on sdn.
 
Last edited:
It is peak IMRT days. The peacock is a thing of the recent past and everyone you know is raking it in.

Now you wake up and are facing a breadline/financial ruin.
 
one of the perma-hiring rural places in Wisconsin and bring in $700k/year.

This is hyperbole. I actually did apply to and interview with Wisconsin practices years ago and nobody was offering me anywhere close to $700k/year.
 
Wonder how many problems we could solve by requiring programs to hire all of their own unhired graduates at market rate (minus some fair percent, ie. not PGY-6 GME rates).

Edit: since we're talking crazy, how about pegging allowed resident numbers to area population size, and letting programs compete for the pool.
 
Last edited:
One major difference between SDN and #radonc Twitter is that on Twitter you only get 280 characters for your drivel. On SDN, you can use as many characters as you want to say absolutely nothing.

Edit: Not necessarily in reference to carbon's comment.

2nd edit:. Possibly referring to the comment immediately preceding carbon's.

You mean like you just did? One of the problems with these online speaking posts, whether it's Twitter, Reddit, SDN, or whatever is that they tend towards a steady state of some specific group think. Because deep down most humans want an echo chamber to confirm their prior held beliefs, you end up with snarky responses like yours, which are the equivalent of calling someone whose opinions you don't like "unprofessional" in academics or "racist" or "socialist" in politics to avoid even having to address it. If I truly didn't say anything (or Dan for that matter), then I doubt it would have garnered such a response.

Clearly a bachelor and very out of touch

I always get a kick when the 90%-tile established PP crowd chimes in about being out of touch. It's fun to arm-chair-quarterback about solutions to problem that could potentially threaten your bottom line, but when push comes to shove you have to so-called "pretzel" yourself into justifying working for Evicore. I never thought I'd see so many peers contorting so hard to try and find a moral loophole about how working for Evicore could potentially, maybe be ok in a certain specific scenario if it prevents you from having to move to a less expensive house or pull your kids out of private school or not get to see your parents every other day (gasp!). Especially when these are the same people that repeatedly call them "Evilcore." Pot, meet kettle!

Yeah, if my Dad could throw 100 racks at me if I called him, I probably would have breezed over that Tweet and not thought twice.

There is a disconnect between what you are talking about and what others are talking about. I come from a similar background as you. There are many of our peers who grew up with the silver spoon. I've known lots of these people, and the one thing they all have in common is they are fiercely protective of their assets and status. They will preach one thing, such as a certain social cause, but as soon as the means to their lifestyle is threatened, they will turn on a dime. I have seen it so many times. It is quite pathetic.

I'm largely on the side of everyone else here, but I draw the line at trying to justify how working for Evicore is ok. I am well aware that $100k doing physicals or other low level MD work is not going to cut it for a physician's family in a large city without a lifestyle hit. But the reality is that plenty of people live on less than that and somehow manage to raise families through residency. My siblings and I went to public schools, I see my parents maybe twice a year, and when I grew up, my dad was the same way and he made a hell of a lot less than doctors did. Yet I'm the out of touch one? I have posted numerous times that rad oncs should fight to keep all of the professional fees they generate. I fully believe that we should keep 100% of our pro fees, and those fees should be hefty as our work is valuable. But if you can't get a job where you want and the only way you can have an acceptable lifestyle is to work for a company that routinely denies lifesaving care, I'm sorry but no, GTFO. MOVE. Kids and families move all the time because their parents want to provide the best they can for them. That's not some unusual hardship. That's normal life for the vast majority of society.

With regards to the numerous posts calling B.S. on rural docs making $700k/year, I am an employee in a fairly large Midwestern city. I personally know numerous docs in rural areas in surrounding states, either employed or independent making this much or more. If you take a rural job paying less than 500k, you've got some major red flags or you have just done incredibly poorly in your job search and negotiating. With regards to the WI job I had previously ripped on, someone reached out to me and verified that the income they were told to expect, and the number they gave was appropriate. I have zero doubt there are still exploitative jobs in rural areas trying to snag someone desperate on the cheap and these numbers are probably still growing (the Victoria, TX one is still high on my radar), but the jobs where you can make 75% MGMA are not fairly tale unobtanium (otherwise I suppose the MGMA is just making up stuff). They are just in places that the vast majority of rad oncs wouldn't consider going for any price, and as a result, I believe these places are keen to that and don't even bother offering interviews to these kinds of applicants.

Just in case the length of this reply relegates it to the empty drivel category again, here is the TL;DR saying something loud and clear:

If you work for Evicore, I am absolutely going to judge you. Sorry not sorry. Unpopular opinion is shockingly unpopular.
 
You mean like you just did? One of the problems with these online speaking posts, whether it's Twitter, Reddit, SDN, or whatever is that they tend towards a steady state of some specific group think. Because deep down most humans want an echo chamber to confirm their prior held beliefs, you end up with snarky responses like yours, which are the equivalent of calling someone whose opinions you don't like "unprofessional" in academics or "racist" or "socialist" in politics to avoid even having to address it. If I truly didn't say anything (or Dan for that matter), then I doubt it would have garnered such a response.



I always get a kick when the 90%-tile established PP crowd chimes in about being out of touch. It's fun to arm-chair-quarterback about solutions to problem that could potentially threaten your bottom line, but when push comes to shove you have to so-called "pretzel" yourself into justifying working for Evicore. I never thought I'd see so many peers contorting so hard to try and find a moral loophole about how working for Evicore could potentially, maybe be ok in a certain specific scenario if it prevents you from having to move to a less expensive house or pull your kids out of private school or not get to see your parents every other day (gasp!). Especially when these are the same people that repeatedly call them "Evilcore." Pot, meet kettle!



There is a disconnect between what you are talking about and what others are talking about. I come from a similar background as you. There are many of our peers who grew up with the silver spoon. I've known lots of these people, and the one thing they all have in common is they are fiercely protective of their assets and status. They will preach one thing, such as a certain social cause, but as soon as the means to their lifestyle is threatened, they will turn on a dime. I have seen it so many times. It is quite pathetic.

I'm largely on the side of everyone else here, but I draw the line at trying to justify how working for Evicore is ok. I am well aware that $100k doing physicals or other low level MD work is not going to cut it for a physician's family in a large city without a lifestyle hit. But the reality is that plenty of people live on less than that and somehow manage to raise families through residency. My siblings and I went to public schools, I see my parents maybe twice a year, and when I grew up, my dad was the same way and he made a hell of a lot less than doctors did. Yet I'm the out of touch one? I have posted numerous times that rad oncs should fight to keep all of the professional fees they generate. I fully believe that we should keep 100% of our pro fees, and those fees should be hefty as our work is valuable. But if you can't get a job where you want and the only way you can have an acceptable lifestyle is to work for a company that routinely denies lifesaving care, I'm sorry but no, GTFO. MOVE. Kids and families move all the time because their parents want to provide the best they can for them. That's not some unusual hardship. That's normal life for the vast majority of society.

With regards to the numerous posts calling B.S. on rural docs making $700k/year, I am an employee in a fairly large Midwestern city. I personally know numerous docs in rural areas in surrounding states, either employed or independent making this much or more. If you take a rural job paying less than 500k, you've got some major red flags or you have just done incredibly poorly in your job search and negotiating. With regards to the WI job I had previously ripped on, someone reached out to me and verified that the income they were told to expect, and the number they gave was appropriate. I have zero doubt there are still exploitative jobs in rural areas trying to snag someone desperate on the cheap and these numbers are probably still growing (the Victoria, TX one is still high on my radar), but the jobs where you can make 75% MGMA are not fairly tale unobtanium (otherwise I suppose the MGMA is just making up stuff). They are just in places that the vast majority of rad oncs wouldn't consider going for any price, and as a result, I believe these places are keen to that and don't even bother offering interviews to these kinds of applicants.

Just in case the length of this reply relegates it to the empty drivel category again, here is the TL;DR saying something loud and clear:

If you work for Evicore, I am absolutely going to judge you. Sorry not sorry. Unpopular opinion is shockingly unpopular.
It's not the length that relegates it to drivel. It's the content.
 
You mean like you just did? One of the problems with these online speaking posts, whether it's Twitter, Reddit, SDN, or whatever is that they tend towards a steady state of some specific group think. Because deep down most humans want an echo chamber to confirm their prior held beliefs, you end up with snarky responses like yours, which are the equivalent of calling someone whose opinions you don't like "unprofessional" in academics or "racist" or "socialist" in politics to avoid even having to address it. If I truly didn't say anything (or Dan for that matter), then I doubt it would have garnered such a response.



I always get a kick when the 90%-tile established PP crowd chimes in about being out of touch. It's fun to arm-chair-quarterback about solutions to problem that could potentially threaten your bottom line, but when push comes to shove you have to so-called "pretzel" yourself into justifying working for Evicore. I never thought I'd see so many peers contorting so hard to try and find a moral loophole about how working for Evicore could potentially, maybe be ok in a certain specific scenario if it prevents you from having to move to a less expensive house or pull your kids out of private school or not get to see your parents every other day (gasp!). Especially when these are the same people that repeatedly call them "Evilcore." Pot, meet kettle!



There is a disconnect between what you are talking about and what others are talking about. I come from a similar background as you. There are many of our peers who grew up with the silver spoon. I've known lots of these people, and the one thing they all have in common is they are fiercely protective of their assets and status. They will preach one thing, such as a certain social cause, but as soon as the means to their lifestyle is threatened, they will turn on a dime. I have seen it so many times. It is quite pathetic.

I'm largely on the side of everyone else here, but I draw the line at trying to justify how working for Evicore is ok. I am well aware that $100k doing physicals or other low level MD work is not going to cut it for a physician's family in a large city without a lifestyle hit. But the reality is that plenty of people live on less than that and somehow manage to raise families through residency. My siblings and I went to public schools, I see my parents maybe twice a year, and when I grew up, my dad was the same way and he made a hell of a lot less than doctors did. Yet I'm the out of touch one? I have posted numerous times that rad oncs should fight to keep all of the professional fees they generate. I fully believe that we should keep 100% of our pro fees, and those fees should be hefty as our work is valuable. But if you can't get a job where you want and the only way you can have an acceptable lifestyle is to work for a company that routinely denies lifesaving care, I'm sorry but no, GTFO. MOVE. Kids and families move all the time because their parents want to provide the best they can for them. That's not some unusual hardship. That's normal life for the vast majority of society.

With regards to the numerous posts calling B.S. on rural docs making $700k/year, I am an employee in a fairly large Midwestern city. I personally know numerous docs in rural areas in surrounding states, either employed or independent making this much or more. If you take a rural job paying less than 500k, you've got some major red flags or you have just done incredibly poorly in your job search and negotiating. With regards to the WI job I had previously ripped on, someone reached out to me and verified that the income they were told to expect, and the number they gave was appropriate. I have zero doubt there are still exploitative jobs in rural areas trying to snag someone desperate on the cheap and these numbers are probably still growing (the Victoria, TX one is still high on my radar), but the jobs where you can make 75% MGMA are not fairly tale unobtanium (otherwise I suppose the MGMA is just making up stuff). They are just in places that the vast majority of rad oncs wouldn't consider going for any price, and as a result, I believe these places are keen to that and don't even bother offering interviews to these kinds of applicants.

Just in case the length of this reply relegates it to the empty drivel category again, here is the TL;DR saying something loud and clear:

If you work for Evicore, I am absolutely going to judge you. Sorry not sorry. Unpopular opinion is shockingly unpopular.

tnis doesn’t even make sense

we shouldn’t whine bc non physicians survive off less money??

When does that thinking stop? Maybe you should accept $50K bc that’s more than a homeless person in Tibet

Once you start making a certain salary your comparator group automatically changes.

You think CEOs are like no thanks I don’t want my 2 mill bonus this quarter bc @Turaco isnt making as much as me but is still doing good enough
 
Last edited:
It's not the length that relegates it to drivel. It's the content.

My dude, you are literally defending working for Evicore. Don't lecture about drivel.

tnis doesn’t even make sense

we shouldn’t whine bc non physicians survive off less money??

When does that thinking stop? Maybe you should accept $50K bc that’s more than a homeless person in Tibet

Once you start making a certain salary your comparator group automatically changes.

You think CEOs are like no thanks I don’t want my 2 mill bonus this quarter bc @Turaco isnt making as much as me but is still doing good enough

I agree. I don't know how you got that from what I wrote, but seeing as you somehow did (to your credit at least you read it and attempted some sort of actual reply unlike the above poster), then yes that makes no sense. You might want to read it again, but I am not saying that most people make less than $100k therefore rad oncs should not whine about having to deal with their being some imaginable scenario with a non-zero probability of occuring in the future where they don't have a guaranteed $30-50k/month paycheck coming in. That is a strawman -- that is not my argument. What I'm saying is that if you're not making the money you want to in the location you want to because of unfavorable market dynamics and you choose to work for Evicore to bring in money so you don't have to move, then you suck. If you choose to do it on the side to pad your existing income, then you especially suck. Have some principles and grow a spine.

This is the silver spoon mentality I was referring to that plagues medicine, especially in multi-generational doctor families. This expectation that you are somehow entitled to a certain paying job and lifestyle. If the market where you want to live is oversupplied because too many rad oncs were trained, that doesn't justify doing things like opening a pill mill or working for obstructionist companies like Evicore that harm patients. What happened to our oath? Do no harm?

I have no issues with rad oncs making large amounts of money treating patients. We should. We should not sell our souls to try and have our cake and eat it too even if the reasoning is that our leaders threw us under the bus. So yeah, go ahead and call it "Evilcore" again.

5ccc9k.jpg
 
My dude, you are literally defending working for Evicore. Don't lecture about drivel.



I agree. I don't know how you got that from what I wrote, but seeing as you somehow did (to your credit at least you read it and attempted some sort of actual reply unlike the above poster), then yes that makes no sense. You might want to read it again, but I am not saying that most people make less than $100k therefore rad oncs should not whine about having to deal with their being some imaginable scenario with a non-zero probability of occuring in the future where they don't have a guaranteed $30-50k/month paycheck coming in. That is a strawman -- that is not my argument. What I'm saying is that if you're not making the money you want to in the location you want to because of unfavorable market dynamics and you choose to work for Evicore to bring in money so you don't have to move, then you suck. If you choose to do it on the side to pad your existing income, then you especially suck. Have some principles and grow a spine.

This is the silver spoon mentality I was referring to that plagues medicine, especially in multi-generational doctor families. This expectation that you are somehow entitled to a certain paying job and lifestyle. If the market where you want to live is oversupplied because too many rad oncs were trained, that doesn't justify doing things like opening a pill mill or working for obstructionist companies like Evicore that harm patients. What happened to our oath? Do no harm?

I have no issues with rad oncs making large amounts of money treating patients. We should. We should not sell our souls to try and have our cake and eat it too even if the reasoning is that our leaders threw us under the bus. So yeah, go ahead and call it "Evilcore" again.

5ccc9k.jpg

I’ve had good conversations with some Evicore docs where we both worked together to make the necessary treatment happen.

Picture a radonc who, due to family circumstances, takes an Evicore job, but then works as hard as possible to be an advocate for the patient, because they really did believe that it was important. Not too hard to picture that same radonc thinking “I just saved the healthcare system a decent chunk of money by not allowing this greedy radonc to do 40 Gy in 20 fx for a bone met. That money will be used to improve care for everyone.”

Vilifying an entire group of colleagues and condemning them as one does not foster the kind of discussion we realistically should be trying to have with all our various partners on the paying side of care.
 
I’ve had good conversations with some Evicore docs where we both worked together to make the necessary treatment happen.

Picture a radonc who, due to family circumstances, takes an Evicore job, but then works as hard as possible to be an advocate for the patient, because they really did believe that it was important. Not too hard to picture that same radonc thinking “I just saved the healthcare system a decent chunk of money by not allowing this greedy radonc to do 40 Gy in 20 fx for a bone met. That money will be used to improve care for everyone.”

Vilifying an entire group of colleagues and condemning them as one does not foster the kind of discussion we realistically should be trying to have with all our various partners on the paying side of care.
This is it. This is the nuance that Twitter didn’t allow for, and I wish he had taken a breath before making a blanket statement about our colleagues (and yes, they are our colleagues).
 
My dude, you are literally defending working for Evicore. Don't lecture about drivel.



I agree. I don't know how you got that from what I wrote, but seeing as you somehow did (to your credit at least you read it and attempted some sort of actual reply unlike the above poster), then yes that makes no sense. You might want to read it again, but I am not saying that most people make less than $100k therefore rad oncs should not whine about having to deal with their being some imaginable scenario with a non-zero probability of occuring in the future where they don't have a guaranteed $30-50k/month paycheck coming in. That is a strawman -- that is not my argument. What I'm saying is that if you're not making the money you want to in the location you want to because of unfavorable market dynamics and you choose to work for Evicore to bring in money so you don't have to move, then you suck. If you choose to do it on the side to pad your existing income, then you especially suck. Have some principles and grow a spine.

This is the silver spoon mentality I was referring to that plagues medicine, especially in multi-generational doctor families. This expectation that you are somehow entitled to a certain paying job and lifestyle. If the market where you want to live is oversupplied because too many rad oncs were trained, that doesn't justify doing things like opening a pill mill or working for obstructionist companies like Evicore that harm patients. What happened to our oath? Do no harm?

I have no issues with rad oncs making large amounts of money treating patients. We should. We should not sell our souls to try and have our cake and eat it too even if the reasoning is that our leaders threw us under the bus. So yeah, go ahead and call it "Evilcore" again.

5ccc9k.jpg
Isn’t this just another type of virtue signaling?
 
True but unseen macroscopic damage to society. Less jobs, teachers, fire fighter and homeless services because health care averages out to something like 12k per person in the USA.
Not to get too political, but this is the price we pay for capitalism. When there is no cap, the rich become richer while the poor becomes poorer. Now if the rich were to give back to society, things wouldn’t be so bad.

Unfortunately, the rich become powerful and look to hold on to their wealth and create ways to suppress other people. The healthcare industry is a billion dollar business. The CEO’s and board directors of drug companies, hospitals, and insurance companies are all making tens of millions of dollars (even billions), but yet we are all fraction and job shaming each other. Meanwhile, a patient may suffer because they can’t get approved for some medication, treatment or a test. Im not siding with the doctors who knowingly try to bill for higher services either so nobody is innocent in this system.

I hate having to call for a peer to peer like everyone else and feel it’s a waste of time and too stringent at times for review but fortunately, the majority of the time, I am able to get the treatment plan I’ve requested. There have been a few times where I was told “no” but made the best of what I could do at the time. I’m sure if we allowed a full use of our system, there would be some institutions utilizing protons to treat everything while some docs are giving IMRT/30 Fx to every bone met.
 
Last edited:
Not to get too political, but this is the price we pay for capitalism. When there is no cap, the rich become richer while the poor becomes poorer. Now if the rich were to give back to society, things wouldn’t be so bad.

Unfortunately, the rich become powerful and look to hold on to their wealth and create ways to suppress other people. The healthcare industry is a billion dollar business. The CEO’s and board directors of drug companies, hospitals, and insurance companies are all making tens of millions of dollars (even billions), but yet we are all fraction and job shaming each other. Meanwhile, a patient may suffer because they can’t get approved for some medication, treatment or a test. Im not siding with the doctors who knowingly try to bill for higher services either so nobody is innocent in this system.

I hate having to call for a peer to peer like everyone else and feel it’s a waste of time and too stringent at times for review but fortunately, the majority of the time, I am able to get the treatment plan I’ve requested. There have been a few times where I was told “no” but made the best of what I could do at the time. I’m sure if we allowed a full use of our system, there would be some institutions utilizing protons to treat everything while some docs are giving IMRT/30 Fx to every bone met.
similar experience here. If I were to lose my job, I would have no issue working for Evicore or a center that charges 20 x cms rates vs having to move away from my kids. If circumstances force a doc to evercore, why is the doc anymore “at fault” than the chairs responsible for residency expansion? Does Dan Spratt share some responsibility if his grads can’t get jobs in 5 years for not shutting down his program?

As someone posted above, we never hear about all the inappropriate care that evercore catches, so some inherent bias in our judgement.
 
Last edited:
If the market where you want to live is oversupplied because too many rad oncs were trained, that doesn't justify doing things like opening a pill mill or working for obstructionist companies like Evicore that harm patients.

5ccc9k.jpg
Not a single criticism of the chairs and PDs that created this problem to begin? Ridiculous. I'm not going to blame people for trying to stay employed when chairs have basically farked the market for everyone
 
similar experience here. If I were to lose my job, I would have no issue working for Evicore or a center that charges 20 x cms rates vs having to move away from my kids. If circumstances force a doc to evercore, why is the doc anymore “at fault” than the chairs responsible for residency expansion?

As someone posted above, we never hear about all the inappropriate care that evercore catches, so some inherent bias in our judgement.
I'll admit the hypocrisy on my part that I can find empathy for eviCore employees yet am mostly angry at departmental Chairs.

However, this forum hasn't been universally disparaging of the academic leadership either. As everyone likes to point out, we love Dan Spratt, and he's now a chair. Louis Potters has caught a lot of ire for the things he himself has explicitly written and done...yet I think we acknowledge how great it is that he engages at all. I don't think I have literally EVER heard anyone say ANYTHING negative about Brian Kavanagh, both online and in real life, etc etc.

So I don't think it's entirely accurate to say that we can't appreciate nuance in the RadOnc leadership, either. Again, the difference is: no one takes a chair job out of desperation. Becoming an academic chair is like becoming a professional bodybuilder. You don't turn into a bodybuilder by accident. It takes years of intentional planning and action.

By that same logic, I would absolutely not defend, and will absolutely judge, right alongside @Turaco, anyone who pursues an insurance job as "Career Choice #1", even if they have other options, simply because they can get more money or whatever. But, I don't know how many docs set out to become eviCore employees when they graduated medical school...and I'm making the assumption that many of them, maybe most, aren't living the lives they wanted.

For me, the empathy comes from all the conversations I've had over the last year as my class struggled to find jobs. I have had many serious discussions with people about how we could get jobs at insurance companies. That being said (also as @Turaco pointed out), I have had many, many conversations about getting "outside-the-box" jobs too. Personally, I had two non-RadOnc jobs lined up for myself if I didn't find a "real" job (one clinical, one industry). Insurance wasn't my go-to backup, but my other two backup plans probably paid nowhere near what being a "hired gun" would bring me. Insurance was my "Option D".

Insurance will remain my "Option D".
 
I’ve had good conversations with some Evicore docs where we both worked together to make the necessary treatment happen.

Picture a radonc who, due to family circumstances, takes an Evicore job, but then works as hard as possible to be an advocate for the patient, because they really did believe that it was important. Not too hard to picture that same radonc thinking “I just saved the healthcare system a decent chunk of money by not allowing this greedy radonc to do 40 Gy in 20 fx for a bone met. That money will be used to improve care for everyone.”

Vilifying an entire group of colleagues and condemning them as one does not foster the kind of discussion we realistically should be trying to have with all our various partners on the paying side of care.

In my experience with Evicore "docs" I've had exactly one who went out of his way to try and find a loophole to get the patient treatment. I could tell he felt bad about what he was doing and likely was told to change his tune or didn't last long. All the others shamelessly followed the cookbook, and quite a few even took joy in issuing the denials as if they enjoyed the power, including one very pathetic woman who lectured me on being incompetent and told me that trial data was a "cop-out." My takeaway is that these people essentially have no discretion and are not permitted to deviate from the guidelines. I have personally watched them kill patients. So, no, no love lost here. I absolutely will vilify anybody who works for Evicore and stand by everything I wrote previously.

Isn’t this just another type of virtue signaling?

See above about killing patients. Althuogh there is an interesting debate whether calling out virtue signalling itself is some form of virtue signalling and an ad hominem. Although to do it properly, I would need to be posting on Twitter with my name, face, pronouns, etc, and include a bunch of ultrawoke nonsense that I know nobody is permitted to challenge and pose no risk to me whatsoever. Maybe Dan's original tweet was virtue signalling (before he tried to walk it back), but he 100% nailed it.

Not a single criticism of the chairs and PDs that created this problem to begin? Ridiculous. I'm not going to blame people for trying to stay employed when chairs have basically farked the market for everyone

I have criticized programs that overtrained multiple times, including directly in this thread and even in the silly little meme I created that you quoted. Regardless, there are some basic things you are expected to get right in life and as a doctor. Not profiting from a company that kills patients is one of them. This thread showed a lot of true colors. Sad.
 
I have criticized programs that overtrained multiple times, including directly in this thread and even in the silly little meme I created that you quoted. Regardless, there are some basic things you are expected to get right in life and as a doctor. Not profiting from a company that kills patients is one of them. This thread showed a lot of true colors. Sad.
Pretty sure evilcore would have never had the oxygen to get started without the boomers giving 20+ fx Palliative and ongoing 33+ fx breast for everyone for years.

You aren't going to acknowledge the other side of that coin?
 
Pretty sure evilcore would have never had the oxygen to get started without the boomers giving 20+ fx Palliative and ongoing 33+ fx breast for everyone for years.

You aren't going to acknowledge the other side of that coin?

@Turaco - yeah I hate to say it but if you read evicore guidelines, they aren’t exactly garbage

lot of it makes sense and is data driven

now it annoys me when I have to occasionally talk to them to do 3DCRT for breast when it’s common sense but like @medgator said, older ROs milked the system beyond belief by doing BS things and now we are all paying the price
 
Last edited:
Pretty sure evilcore would have never had the oxygen to get started without the boomers giving 20+ fx Palliative and ongoing 33+ fx breast for everyone for years.

You aren't going to acknowledge the other side of that coin?
The oxygen for Evicore was the boom of IMRT (which sidestepped insurance review for a long time) and then the BOOM of IGRT and then IMRT/IGRT tech slowly boom boomed into all the boomers’ clinics. (And academics got on the IMRT and IGRT train too; it took some time in some places.) Over a ten year period Rad onc spending must have tripled or so. From afar it looked like chicanery. But on the ground, we were all just (rightly) using the new toys. I think I had my first Evicore peer to peer around 2013. Evicore came along to say “playtime is over.” The really onerous 20 fraction palliative cases stick out as anecdotes, but (as always) IMRT and IGRT were the meat. The 20 fraction palliatives are now just completely pre screened before it even hits a peer to peer. Peer to peer is like when we are arguing for SBRT to spine for an oligomet nowadays.
 
The oxygen for Evicore was the boom of IMRT (which sidestepped insurance review for a long time) and then the BOOM of IGRT and then IMRT/IGRT tech slowly boom boomed into all the boomers’ clinics. (And academics got on the IMRT and IGRT train too; it took some time in some places.) Over a ten year period Rad onc spending must have tripled or so. From afar it looked like chicanery. But on the ground, we were all just (rightly) using the new toys. I think I had my first Evicore peer to peer around 2013. Evicore came along to say “playtime is over.” The really onerous 20 fraction palliative cases stick out as anecdotes, but (as always) IMRT and IGRT were the meat. The 20 fraction palliatives are now just completely pre screened before it even hits a peer to peer. Peer to peer is like when we are arguing for SBRT to spine for an oligomet nowadays.
10 years ago, even some academic centers would conventionally fractionated breast followed by balloon brachy boost
 
See above about killing patients. Althuogh there is an interesting debate whether calling out virtue signalling itself is some form of virtue signalling and an ad hominem. Although to do it properly, I would need to be posting on Twitter with my name, face, pronouns, etc, and include a bunch of ultrawoke nonsense that I know nobody is permitted to challenge and pose no risk to me whatsoever. Maybe Dan's original tweet was virtue signalling (before he tried to walk it back), but he 100% nailed it.
It's lazy to condemn a person about whom you know very little who does something unsavory. I wonder if there isn't a small portion of your life that could be called out on an anonymous forum... maybe you are that guy who goes 2 mph above the speed limit in the left lane :thinking:

When in doubt, hate the sin, love the sinner...
 
Guys, where on this website it the data about pricing of major academic centers? I remember UPMC being particularly bad

simul out there waging war
 
Guys, where on this website it the data about pricing of major academic centers? I remember UPMC being particularly bad

simul out there waging war
The UPMC system is particularly bad in many ways. They have been buying up PPs and make everyone an employee. “Only 3-5 hours from this city” say their ads. Let’s just say they are not offering 700k+ For these hellpit locations (not even low quality biryani). These jobs used to offer that kind of money in rural areas now they have dried up. The biggest enemies are these academic systems which want everyone to work for them and monopolize cancer care. Choose wisely folks!!!
 
Top