- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,206
- Reaction score
- 5,903
Isn’t there a horror movie where the guy has to start eating part of his body to survive
8 more fractions for unresectable Ewing's.
Isn’t there a horror movie where the guy has to start eating part of his body to survive
2 versus 5 fractions? when did we get to 5?
Lot of lies there about cost and convenience. Could stay at home and continue work while getting 5 fractions of sbrt at home. I am sure New York Presbyterian charges a s load for sbrt prostate.When they figured out you can get treatment done in one week off of work away from your home. Your catchment area just went to infinity.
I can’t hate too much - at least they’re doing it on trial.Lot of lies there about cost and convenience. Could stay at home and continue work while getting 5 fractions of sbrt at home. I am sure New York Presbyterian charges a s load for sbrt prostate.
When they figured out you can get treatment done in one week off of work away from your home. Your catchment area just went to infinity.
Lumpectomy cavity is a lot more foregiving than prostate. Should see 2 or single fraction. I think someone had preliminary data at estro for single fraction.That plus APM. A lot of people are preparing for a world of doing as little as possible to collect a fixed payment.
Single fraction post-lump RT is a hot, trendy topic. It was hotter than DEI at ACRO. The cool kids do it with MRgRT, natch. I think they reported one local failure in 200+ patients at many years.Lumpectomy cavity is a lot more foregiving than prostate. Should see 2 or single fraction. I think someone had preliminary data at estro for single fraction.
I’m going to run a trial that will get it down to 0. Oh wait PROTECT…2 fractions of hdr worked out so well that this trial was a given. True equipoise.These kind of trials are what make our field so special. Let’s get prostate sbrt down to 2!
2 fractions of hdr worked out so well that this trial was a given. True equipoise.These kind of trials are what make our field so special. Let’s get prostate sbrt down to 2!
My understanding is that the hdrx2 experience was both more toxic and less effective. Maybe they will try to claim that space oar reduces toxicity despite hdr dosimeteric advantage, but how can it possibly be more effective than hdrx2?The equipoise question is the interesting one here, as I do not understand how they can say there is true equipoise between those two arms.
Someone is going to need to explain to me how HDR = SBRT, then, if that's their hypothesis.My understanding is that the hdrx2 experience was both more toxic and less effective. Maybe they will try to claim that space oar reduces toxicity despite hdr dosimeteric advantage, but how can it possibly be more effective than hdrx2?
I really don’t think they have a legitimate clinical hypothesis. This is marketing.Someone is going to need to explain to me how HDR = SBRT, then, if that's their hypothesis.
Plus, as we've mentioned before ad nauseum here, you don't need SpaceOAR for 5 fractions. So, if you're placing it for 2 fractions, then we already have one of the arms of the trial with 100% grade 1 toxicity.
It’s like me weighing in on a DEI thread on twitterOh thank goodness he weighed in, I was wondering what a medonc thought of the question
As a wallnerus you bring a valuable trans-species perspective that should not be airbrushed out of herstory.It’s like me weighing in on a DEI thread on twitter
Oh manI mean this exact statement could be made of anyone, wherever they work. It doesn't have anything to do with 'experts' or non-experts
the point is anybody anywhere should do more than the bare minimum of meeting the scorecard, if they can.
Hmmm your computers must have been trained by my Dosimetrists...Oh man
At risk of doxing myself, we recently implemented an automated breast tangent process. I was not in the initial pilot, but in the regular roll out
I rejected every single left heart dose that it auto planned for me. The computer planned to what was met the constraint, but not clinically acceptable given the circumstance. It was one frustration among many.
This guy's tweets are actually kind of fun to read...
What kind of a needle is that? 2 feet long?
this is a jon dunn type post
Well as much as we say med students should be cautious about rad onc if you can wind up being Burri… choosing rad onc would be a no brainerthis is a jon dunn type post
He's got a Pretty soso google reviewWell as much as we say med students should be cautious about rad onc if you can wind up being Burri… choosing rad onc would be a no brainer
There is huge proton lobby money behind this , I have no doubt
However maybe it’s like APM - the proton lobby protects their interest but helps everyone else accidentally
Striking down prior auth would destroy health care.
No one likes prior auth. With health care costs and prices already out of control, I doubt we could sustain a system without prior auth. At least when it comes to radiation, conventionally fractionated proton radiation would quickly be recommended for everything. Prior authorization is not the root of the issue. Upenn charging 300k to Pennsylvania employers for prostate proton is.I'm for this. Prior authorization are so stupid. Let's make more barriers for cancer patients who need urgent treatment.
Business minded rad onc
No prior authorization needed
This is bananas.Treating synchrous bilateral breast cancer is not challenging
Do you even feather, brah?Treating synchrous bilateral breast cancer is not challenging
This is bananas.
They want us to do bone Mets, whole brain and maybe tangent breast (but watch it with the IMRT). The rest - high volume centers
Whatever you do, don't look at VAERS25 MAUDE reports in April alone, most of which are pretty bad, i.e. fistula.
Looks like 330 in past year. About 1 report per day.
I can't imagine using this on every guy through the door.
Do you even feather, brah?
Gotta cover that pre-sternal breast tissue (I learned anatomy from Total Recall).