Rad Onc Twitter

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Isn’t there a horror movie where the guy has to start eating part of his body to survive

8 more fractions for unresectable Ewing's.

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
2 versus 5 fractions? when did we get to 5?



When they figured out you can get treatment done in one week off of work away from your home. Your catchment area just went to infinity.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
When they figured out you can get treatment done in one week off of work away from your home. Your catchment area just went to infinity.
Lot of lies there about cost and convenience. Could stay at home and continue work while getting 5 fractions of sbrt at home. I am sure New York Presbyterian charges a s load for sbrt prostate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Members don't see this ad :)
Lot of lies there about cost and convenience. Could stay at home and continue work while getting 5 fractions of sbrt at home. I am sure New York Presbyterian charges a s load for sbrt prostate.
I can’t hate too much - at least they’re doing it on trial.

I’m interested to see PACE and GU -005 report though.

I feel like we’re still trying to figure out optimal 5 fraction dosing too. And do you escalate an mri detected nodule of interest? A lot of moving parts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
When they figured out you can get treatment done in one week off of work away from your home. Your catchment area just went to infinity.

That plus APM. A lot of people are preparing for a world of doing as little as possible to collect a fixed payment.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
That plus APM. A lot of people are preparing for a world of doing as little as possible to collect a fixed payment.
Lumpectomy cavity is a lot more foregiving than prostate. Should see 2 or single fraction. I think someone had preliminary data at estro for single fraction.
 
Lumpectomy cavity is a lot more foregiving than prostate. Should see 2 or single fraction. I think someone had preliminary data at estro for single fraction.
Single fraction post-lump RT is a hot, trendy topic. It was hotter than DEI at ACRO. The cool kids do it with MRgRT, natch. I think they reported one local failure in 200+ patients at many years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
2 fractions of hdr worked out so well that this trial was a given. True equipoise.These kind of trials are what make our field so special. Let’s get prostate sbrt down to 2!
I’m going to run a trial that will get it down to 0. Oh wait PROTECT…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
2 fractions of hdr worked out so well that this trial was a given. True equipoise.These kind of trials are what make our field so special. Let’s get prostate sbrt down to 2!

The equipoise question is the interesting one here, as I do not understand how they can say there is true equipoise between those two arms.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The equipoise question is the interesting one here, as I do not understand how they can say there is true equipoise between those two arms.
My understanding is that the hdrx2 experience was both more toxic and less effective. Maybe they will try to claim that space oar reduces toxicity despite hdr dosimeteric advantage, but how can it possibly be more effective than hdrx2?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
My understanding is that the hdrx2 experience was both more toxic and less effective. Maybe they will try to claim that space oar reduces toxicity despite hdr dosimeteric advantage, but how can it possibly be more effective than hdrx2?
Someone is going to need to explain to me how HDR = SBRT, then, if that's their hypothesis.

Plus, as we've mentioned before ad nauseum here, you don't need SpaceOAR for 5 fractions. So, if you're placing it for 2 fractions, then we already have one of the arms of the trial with 100% grade 1 toxicity.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Someone is going to need to explain to me how HDR = SBRT, then, if that's their hypothesis.

Plus, as we've mentioned before ad nauseum here, you don't need SpaceOAR for 5 fractions. So, if you're placing it for 2 fractions, then we already have one of the arms of the trial with 100% grade 1 toxicity.
I really don’t think they have a legitimate clinical hypothesis. This is marketing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Members don't see this ad :)
1652728906905.png
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 13 users
I mean this exact statement could be made of anyone, wherever they work. It doesn't have anything to do with 'experts' or non-experts

the point is anybody anywhere should do more than the bare minimum of meeting the scorecard, if they can.
Oh man

At risk of doxing myself, we recently implemented an automated breast tangent process. I was not in the initial pilot, but in the regular roll out

I rejected every single left heart dose that it auto planned for me. The computer planned to what was met the constraint, but not clinically acceptable given the circumstance. It was one frustration among many.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 5 users
Oh man

At risk of doxing myself, we recently implemented an automated breast tangent process. I was not in the initial pilot, but in the regular roll out

I rejected every single left heart dose that it auto planned for me. The computer planned to what was met the constraint, but not clinically acceptable given the circumstance. It was one frustration among many.
Hmmm your computers must have been trained by my Dosimetrists...
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 users
This guy's tweets are actually kind of fun to read...



What kind of a needle is that? 2 feet long?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
agreed, he really does some wild stuff, very interesting tweets
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This guy's tweets are actually kind of fun to read...



What kind of a needle is that? 2 feet long?

Wowsers. It almost looks like the poor patient had an industrial related accident and was speared with a long, hollow tube.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
There is huge proton lobby money behind this , I have no doubt

However maybe it’s like APM - the proton lobby protects their interest but helps everyone else accidentally

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
One day he will have a tweet that sounds like it came from a normal person

 
I'm for this. Prior authorization are so stupid. Let's make more barriers for cancer patients who need urgent treatment.
No one likes prior auth. With health care costs and prices already out of control, I doubt we could sustain a system without prior auth. At least when it comes to radiation, conventionally fractionated proton radiation would quickly be recommended for everything. Prior authorization is not the root of the issue. Upenn charging 300k to Pennsylvania employers for prostate proton is.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Upenn owns 3 protons centers within 30-40 miles: cherry hill, upenn, lancaster. Recognizing scarop president for her phenomenal work at Astro advocacy day. the rug that ties the room together.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Dislike
  • Haha
Reactions: 3 users


Business minded rad onc

I disagree with him. UPenn’s of the world that are making billions in the present system are not going to transition without a huge fight to value based population capitated care. May as well say big pharm will transition to value based drugs…
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
My biggest problem with all of this "value-based" stuff is who decides what is "valuable" and how is it measured?

There are already enough factors out of our control impacting our patients' outcomes, our career satisfaction, and our salaries - let's just throw some more in there and be completely powerless!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
25 MAUDE reports in April alone, most of which are pretty bad, i.e. fistula.

Looks like 330 in past year. About 1 report per day.

I can't imagine using this on every guy through the door.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
Treating synchrous bilateral breast cancer is not challenging
This is bananas.

They want us to do bone Mets, whole brain and maybe tangent breast (but watch it with the IMRT). The rest - high volume centers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Treating synchrous bilateral breast cancer is not challenging
Do you even feather, brah?

Gotta cover that pre-sternal breast tissue (I learned anatomy from Total Recall).
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This is bananas.

They want us to do bone Mets, whole brain and maybe tangent breast (but watch it with the IMRT). The rest - high volume centers

You can only trewt bone Mets if you’re in the palliative care network.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Top