- Joined
- Sep 7, 2014
- Messages
- 3,489
- Reaction score
- 6,431
Where's Reginald Denny when you need him?
Speaking as someone who had two full-time working parents and spent some time in daycare, I found your assertions interesting... so I checked the literature. The few studies and reviews I have encountered show that there is really no difference in psychological or academic development in children who are raised at home vs. who attend daycare (lo and behold). Do you have data to support your claims... or just some strong feelings that you describe as objective facts?
Agree, and I certainly don't take offense, least of all when someone is trying to be offensive. Just curious about any factual basis for his views, because didn't see any (on my quick google scholar search).I say forget the data here. This is parenting. We are uniformly non-experts when we start and marginally better when we finish. There are multiple radically different models of child raising that seem to work. I'd have a hard time being confident in data anyway, particularly considering the reproducibility of social science studies (even worse than our own studies).
Turaco acknowledges that he is not a parent. His opinion is valid but I'm not taking it seriously. I might take his opinion on maneuvering a small hospital environment seriously but not this. I suspect that if he settles down with a professionally ambitious woman and has kids, his opinion might change.
![]()
The NICHD Study of Early Child Care
According to a recent major study of over 1,300 children across a seven-year period, different child care experiences influence the development of young children. Learn about these influences in this summary of a study conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.www.readingrockets.org
There is of course a lot of nuance and the data is manipulated to draw headlines useful to certain organizations, but the conclusions are what you would expect. Higher quality childcare results in better development, maternal attachment. and fewer behavioral problems.
You have to ask what quality and consistency of child care you are getting at your typical day care. We are not talking about private nannies here. You want to dump your kids in $12/hour wage earner daycare and then ship them off to boarding school, fine. Good luck. Sounds like a sure fire way to raise an entitled disrespectful 16 year old with a cocaine habit. But to people like me, we wonder… why even bother having kids in the first place if you plan to not really make them the center of your life? You see them a few hours every day and maybe for a week or two at a time on some fancy vacation a couple of times a year.
and yes I’m judgemental about this. If you make a plan to have kids, manipulate your residency training to make it as convenient as possible, then immediately dump them in daycare and check out from traditional responsibilities of child raising because it impacts your life too much and look for sympathy as a parent, then I am judging you (if I take the time to care, which is unlikely).
You also have to wonder why daycares have cameras now. The fact that there have to be cameras in these institutions should speak enough. Do you put a camera in your home when your mom or husband stays home to take care of your 6 month old?
Save money and buckle upBut what will happen to us "normies" who only know how to use the healing beam? LOL
Given that you immediately replied within a couple of minutes, you might want to go back and read the entire article and the study data rather than just skimming it looking for a gotcha. Dump your kids in daycare. I don’t care. If i have to explain to you why it’s not preferable to let strangers provide care for your very young children, then I don’t know what to tell you.Ironically, the link you post disputes your own argument:
"In terms of cognitive development, researchers found no benefit for children in exclusive care by their mother. More frequently than not, children in exclusive maternal care scored on cognitive and language measures similarly to children in child care. The few differences that did emerge on the cognitive and language outcomes between children in exclusive maternal care and children in child care showed that high quality care child care provided an advantage and low quality child care a disadvantage in comparison to exclusive maternal care. Among children in care for more than 10 hours per week, those in center care, and to a lesser extent, those in child care homes, performed better on cognitive and language measures than children in other types of care"
More importantly, why do you care? There are a lot of ways to raise a child, and none of them are right. Trust me when I say that you will be better served in life if you can refrain from making sweeping judgements without context. Know how little we truly know and refrain from judgement based on that.
So, to be clear Turaco, your position is as follows
if you can't afford to have one parent at home all times for a pre-daycare aged kid, you can eat ****
if you send your kid to daycare, you can also eat **** for being bad parents
if you can afford a nanny, cry me a river if you also want some time to spend home with your kid (aka, eat ****)
if you can't afford a nanny, you can eat **** as well
Yes, people aren't only telling you to STFU because you don't have kids. I'm sure there are many other reasons.
the vitriol and ad hominem against my frankly mainstream opinion and traditional opinion for all of history until about 2 seconds ago (that family members should raise children if at all possible) is hilarious. I’m done with this topic. You all might want to spend some time in the real world and not just holed up in the doctors lounge and country club.
the vitriol and ad hominem against my frankly mainstream opinion and traditional opinion for all of history until about 2 seconds ago (that family members should raise children if at all possible) is hilarious. I’m done with this topic. You all might want to spend some time in the real world and not just holed up in the doctors lounge and country club.
![]()
The NICHD Study of Early Child Care
According to a recent major study of over 1,300 children across a seven-year period, different child care experiences influence the development of young children. Learn about these influences in this summary of a study conducted by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.www.readingrockets.org
There is of course a lot of nuance and the data is manipulated to draw headlines useful to certain organizations, but the conclusions are what you would expect. Higher quality childcare results in better development, maternal attachment. and fewer behavioral problems.
You have to ask what quality and consistency of child care you are getting at your typical day care. We are not talking about private nannies here. You want to dump your kids in $12/hour wage earner daycare and then ship them off to boarding school, fine. Good luck. Sounds like a sure fire way to raise an entitled disrespectful 16 year old with a cocaine habit. But to people like me, we wonder… why even bother having kids in the first place if you plan to not really make them the center of your life? You see them a few hours every day and maybe for a week or two at a time on some fancy vacation a couple of times a year.
and yes I’m judgemental about this. If you make a plan to have kids, manipulate your residency training to make it as convenient as possible, then immediately dump them in daycare and check out from traditional responsibilities of child raising because it impacts your life too much and look for sympathy as a parent, then I am judging you (if I take the time to care, which is unlikely).
You also have to wonder why daycares have cameras now. The fact that there have to be cameras in these institutions should speak enough. Do you put a camera in your home when your mom or husband stays home to take care of your 6 month old?
You are talking to a bunch of parents about how to raise children when you admit you don't have any... what is this "real world" of which you speak? LOLthe vitriol and ad hominem against my frankly mainstream opinion and traditional opinion for all of history until about 2 seconds ago (that family members should raise children if at all possible) is hilarious. I’m done with this topic. You all might want to spend some time in the real world and not just holed up in the doctors lounge and country club.
His "real world" is a mental construct of how he imagines the Antebellum south.You are talking to a bunch of parents about how to raise children when you admit you don't have any... what is this "real world" of which you speak? LOL
Just ignore them. SDN is supposed to be a forum where everyone's opinions (as long as they are not insulting a person or group, or spreading blatant falsehoods) are welcome. In reality, it is only accepted/welcome unless one has an opinion much different from mainstream. "All opinions are welcome...unless they're the opposite of what I strongly believe"the vitriol and ad hominem against my frankly mainstream opinion and traditional opinion for all of history until about 2 seconds ago (that family members should raise children if at all possible) is hilarious. I’m done with this topic. You all might want to spend some time in the real world and not just holed up in the doctors lounge and country club.
Just ignore them. SDN is supposed to be a forum where everyone's opinions (as long as they are not insulting a person or group, or spreading blatant falsehoods) are welcome. In reality, it is only accepted/welcome unless one has an opinion much different from mainstream. "All opinions are welcome...unless they're the opposite of what I strongly believe"
For the record, I'm not personally into the conversation above and I have no opinions either way. I am also aware that Turaco and KHE are right-wingers in an otherwise clearly leftist SDN RO forum. I am to the left myself but I certainly respect the opinions of those on the right. Unfortunately, most on this forum do not. For them, it's either their way or the wrong way. I recently learned the hard way from my own recent back-and-forth on this thread, that free speech doesn't really exist on SDN if your viewpoint is strongly contrarian. Likewise, the majority on this forum drove KHE out of the forum for his "unique beliefs", and while I personally did not agree with KHE, I had no problem in hearing out his opinions since that's what half the country believes anyway.
Unfortunately, this forum is an excellent microcosm of what is wrong with our country right now. We are hyper-polarized and cannot stand to hear someone with strong contrarian perspectives, even though everyone is entitled to their own opinion and freedom of speech regardless of whether people agree with it or not. SDN RO behaves very poorly with strongly contrarian opinions, which is why we get (and deserve) constant trolling by the rad onc Twitterati and in publications. Maybe we should actually, for once, take a cold hard look at ourselves instead of telling them to take a cold hard look at themselves.
For those people who think vitriol comes from only one side (the opposite side), regardless of whether you have more liberal views or conservative views, maybe you should wake up to the reality that vitriol is a two-way street. One to spew, one to react. I cannot control what anyone else on this forum says, but I can certainly control my response/reaction to them and not start disparaging others or leveling personal attacks. Though I disagree with many things KHE and Turaco say, I strongly support their right to have their opinions and their right to state them without the SDN Gestapo coming after them by subjectively and indeterminately calling it "disrespectful" or "inflammatory". The very same goes with the left-wing majority in these forums too- their opinions are just as appreciated and welcomed. That is my contribution to healing the hyper-polarization ravaging our nation and SDN. Are you ready to make the same contribution or will this all fall on deaf ears?
Just as you are entitled to your opinion, we are entitled to an opinion of you based on your opinion. As many seem to forget, freedom of thought and speech is not freedom from consequence for that thought or spoken word.
Agree 100% with both. Feel free to have counteropinions or judge as much as you like, as long as those opinions/judgment involves no name-calling or childish nonsense. Everyone on this forum is valued and respected and needs to be treated as such. Including the people with similar opinions and the people with contrarian opinions. Period.You certainly have the right, but yah, poor taste will be judged.
I didn’t call anyone an incel. Said it was in the style of an incel.Agree 100% with both. Feel free to have counteropinions or judge as much as you like, as long as those opinions/judgment involves no name-calling or childish nonsense. Everyone on this forum is valued and respected and needs to be treated as such. Including the people with similar opinions and the people with contrarian opinions. Period.
Agree. Just to clarify. I wasn't actually calling you or Turaco an incel. (drewdog posted as I was writing!) I just thought that your posts at that time were of the ilk of the incel online community (basically viewing every event through the narrative of destructive feminist forces) and that a forceful response was appropriate.Agree 100% with both. Feel free to have counteropinions or judge as much as you like, as long as those opinions/judgment involves no name-calling or childish nonsense. Everyone on this forum is valued and respected and needs to be treated as such. Including the people with similar opinions and the people with contrarian opinions. Period.
Reminds me of the politician who said "I don't want to be accused of bringing up my opponents' marital infidelities"I didn’t call anyone an incel. Said it was in the style of an incel.
I didn’t call anyone an incel. Said it was in the style of an incel.
Don't worry about it. If it makes you both feel better, I hereby call myself an incel - and it may be more acceptable to you both then. Unlike most people on SDN (including some above who explicitly say that they judge others), I am not judgmental. Life is short. Time to concentrate on other things.Agree. Just to clarify. I wasn't actually calling you or Turaco an incel. (drewdog posted as I was writing!) I just thought that your posts at that time were of the ilk of the incel online community (basically viewing every event through the narrative of destructive feminist forces) and that a forceful response was appropriate.
Thank you. Now we don’t have to beat around the bush and it isn’t considered name calling.Don't worry about it. If it makes you both feel better, I hereby call myself an incel - and it may be more acceptable to you both then. Unlike most people on SDN (including some above who explicitly say that they judge others), I am not judgmental. Life is short. Time to concentrate on other things.
Also in a similar boat. Took time off between jobs to help out at home. I looked into taking a longer period of time off. Hospital credentialing applications basically will ask you to explain away any absense away from practice of greater than 4-6 weeks for any reason.As an aside - as half of a two physician household with kids, the suggestion that one physician parent can simply “stop working” for a few years to stay home with the kids and then seamlessly return to clinical practice as soon as the kid can go to preschool is a ridiculous one.
Children are not eligible for preschool until around 3 (mostly because being potty trained is frequently a requirement). That’s at least 3 years away from regular clinical practice assuming that you don’t try to have another kid when the first one is still a toddler.
I cannot think of a single state that will reinstate your license after that much time away, even assuming that you can find an employer to hire you. Most states require a “physician re-entry” course that costs between $10,000-$20,000 to participate in.
Suggesting that one parent “step back” to raise kids means that you’re taking a real risk of that parent never practicing medicine again. For people who still have loans and have dedicated decades of their lives to become a physician, this is not an option.
I thought Incel was the Linux version of Microsoft Excel. Turns out, incel just means someone who won't be out motorboating around the lake this weekend.I must admit folks i had no idea what an incel is and i had to look it up. Never had an issue getting tail in the swamp so these issues are completely foreign to me.
You mean, an incel is the person who made the Linux version of excel?I thought Incel was the Linux version of Microsoft Excel. Turns out, incel just means someone who won't be out motorboating around the lake this weekend.
You mean, an incel is the person who made the Linux version of excel?
I too long for the gilded days when a woman knew her place was in the home, raising my kids.
His "real world" is a mental construct of how he imagines the Antebellum south.
As an aside - as half of a two physician household with kids, the suggestion that one physician parent can simply “stop working” for a few years to stay home with the kids and then seamlessly return to clinical practice as soon as the kid can go to preschool is a ridiculous one.
Children are not eligible for preschool until around 3 (mostly because being potty trained is frequently a requirement). That’s at least 3 years away from regular clinical practice assuming that you don’t try to have another kid when the first one is still a toddler.
I cannot think of a single state that will reinstate your license after that much time away, even assuming that you can find an employer to hire you. Most states require a “physician re-entry” course that costs between $10,000-$20,000 to participate in.
Suggesting that one parent “step back” to raise kids means that you’re taking a real risk of that parent never practicing medicine again. For people who still have loans and have dedicated decades of their lives to become a physician, this is not an option.
oh and if they are gonna call ppl dense, then others may call them a loser 🙂
Does not comport with wasting your life in most academic endeavors in this field, which are 90+% bs.It's just not a good look-- who had the brilliant idea to initiate a lecture on "how to live a meaningful life?" This isn't Elie Wiesel or Dietrich Bonhoeffer. If it's the speaker, then "narcissist" is all that comes to mind, unfortunately.
I’ll give @Dan Spratt benefit of the doubt. Maybe he’ll say there are more important things in life than being an academic such as God, family, and friends. But on another note, did you see the @jimmyfallon and @jimmykimmel ?! WhoaIt's just not a good look-- who had the brilliant idea to initiate a lecture on "how to live a meaningful life?" This isn't Elie Wiesel or Dietrich Bonhoeffer. If it's the speaker, then "narcissist" is all that comes to mind, unfortunately.
Lol..."Drive Uber, sell stuff on ebay, Put off weddings..."...
More like he will say there are more important things than finding a job, like uh . . . WiFi, I guess?I’ll give @Dan Spratt benefit of the doubt. Maybe he’ll say there are more important things in life than being an academic such as God, family, and friends. But on another note, did you see the @jimmyfallon and @jimmykimmel ?! Whoa
Right on. Regardless of whose idea it was, Dan Spratt's biggest fan is Dan Spratt. So I'm sure he's absolutely giddy at teaching the whole world how to live, act, behave, and think.It's just not a good look-- who had the brilliant idea to initiate a lecture on "how to live a meaningful life?" This isn't Elie Wiesel or Dietrich Bonhoeffer. If it's the speaker, then "narcissist" is all that comes to mind, unfortunately.