- Joined
- May 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 0
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
I'm very curious how realistic it is to obtain a radiology residency. I quickly became humbled after reviewing the placement statistics from the VIRMP website. I have no idea whether or not I am a competitive or even a realistic candidate.
I received decent grades in vet school (A's and B's), I have a few years experience working as a mobile sonographer (echocardiograms, abdominal scans, FNA's, and tru-cut's, etc.) and additional 5 years experience as a general practitioner at a busy small animal hospital. I have never completed a formal internship program. I'm well aware that the residency covers a range of diagnostics far greater than what I have been exposed to since graduating from veterinary school. And I understand how demanding and challenging the 3 or 4 years would be. I'm simply curious what makes an applicant competitive. Is it grades? Research? Experience in the field? Would it be unrealistic for me to apply? Thank you for any feedback!
I received decent grades in vet school (A's and B's), I have a few years experience working as a mobile sonographer (echocardiograms, abdominal scans, FNA's, and tru-cut's, etc.) and additional 5 years experience as a general practitioner at a busy small animal hospital. I have never completed a formal internship program. I'm well aware that the residency covers a range of diagnostics far greater than what I have been exposed to since graduating from veterinary school. And I understand how demanding and challenging the 3 or 4 years would be. I'm simply curious what makes an applicant competitive. Is it grades? Research? Experience in the field? Would it be unrealistic for me to apply? Thank you for any feedback!