- Joined
- Jul 18, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 1
Seems to me that with family medicine, ranking a program is more about that gut feeling -- about how one meshes with the people at the program and how it seems to align with one's goals --- rather than a more clear cut systematic approach.
What do you guys think though?
Is a gut feeling appoach a little too reckless? I mean, you could try making a chart comparing programs A, B, C, etc along the different criteria you want. Let's say, program "A" comes out as the top. But then I might just have a better "feeling" about "B" in a way I can't quantify it.
Or does ranking for us in family medicine entail both the gut feeling and the systematic?
What do you guys think though?
Is a gut feeling appoach a little too reckless? I mean, you could try making a chart comparing programs A, B, C, etc along the different criteria you want. Let's say, program "A" comes out as the top. But then I might just have a better "feeling" about "B" in a way I can't quantify it.
Or does ranking for us in family medicine entail both the gut feeling and the systematic?