Rankings

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
It could, I guess, be considered an official list of the rankings of PT Schools. However, keep in mind that the rankings posted in that report are based on questionnaires submitted (I believe) to the heads of PT departments, and each school is ranked and given a score by them.

So, let's take University of Southern Cal as an example... a great research school...pretty good location... great facilities/equipment...pretty good clinical contracts...really expensive...extremely high student to teacher ratio.

Now looking at that from a (hypothetical) department head's POV, I could say they are top notch because they churn out tons of great stuff, and their faculty publishes constantly, they are awarded grants like they are nothing...Southern Cal is basically what I want my school to be like.

Looking at it from a student's perspective. They have huge class sizes skewing the student to teacher ratio (GA's--even those who are PT's--are not always helpful)--this will not be helpful in laboratory instruction. They are an extremely expensive PT School, and the cost of living within commuting distance is pretty high as well.

Bottom line...the schools are ranked high because they are pretty good...but the rankings can be skewed based on how the ranking system is established. Take the ranking with a grain of salt and don't decide where you go to school on that ranking system alone.
 
Last edited:
isn't this ranking the same one published by the US News and World Report earlier this year?
 
Ha, my alma mater isn't even on the list! I guess I get what I pay for, and when it comes down to it we had excellent ratios (7-14:1, student: teacher) and cheap tuition. So that works for me.
 
I asked the dean about how the schools are ranked at my interview, he told me that surveys are sent to the department heads, and that's it. US News is where the rankings come from. They also do med school rankings, but have a much more comprehensive and indepth method of ranking schools, so it should be considered much more legit. I've been accepted to Arcadia, attended the campus for a tour, and was not impressed. It's ranked number 7 out of 200+ according to that list. Temple is 10,000 dollars a year in tuition more (35,000 versus roughly 25,000) than many other schools, but also did not stand out to me during my interview. That said, the dean said that USC, Pittsburgh, and Washington St. Louis deserve their rankings. He said they cost more, but the faculty is outstanding at those three locations. Otherwise, I'd suggest that you don't put much (if any) weight into the rankings. Good luck with your application process, I hope this helps.
 
Thanks fallbackplan and Blazersfan22. That's good information to know.
 
what does it means when the rankings are N/A. Does it means they received low scores or that they didn't have enough information to rank them? I guess it could be both reasons.
 
N/A means the school did not participate in the survey. The US News rankings for physical therapy programs is based on the subjective opinion of one member of each school. They're sent a list of program and asked to rank them, and that's how you get the list. The schoosl that chose not to participate in the survey are marked as N/A, it does not mean they're an inferior school in any way.
 
so i guess that ranking system isn't very reliable?🙁
 
I say unreliable on a mild scale but a great marketing tool...
 
...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom