- Joined
- Feb 11, 2008
- Messages
- 773
- Reaction score
- 5
It's not alchemy, it's science. There's reason and logic behind it. You just have to find it.
Organic chemistry is one of the first classes that really tests logic. It's not really a chemistry class as much as a giant exercise in logic. Even the things that seem illogical are logical once you know the mechanism behind them. One of the things that pops into mind is anti-Markovnikov addition to an alkene. The reasoning behind is that the peroxide adds to the less substituted carbon, forcing the cation/free radical to be stabilized with the more substituted carbon which then gets halogenated (or w/e your workup is).
Exactly. Most people here are anonymous, so it's not like there's a benefit to saying that ochem was easy for some of us unless it was.
Ochem was, for me, much more enjoyable and easy than physics or physical chemistry. I have to work a little harder at numbers than a lot of my science-major brethren. But ochem is not about numbers. It's about logic, pure and simple.
The only mechanisms I had to memorize were those which the teacher plainly said were simply too complicated to explain in detail for a beginning ochem course. Everything else was just a diagnostic problem. If you start at point A, and want to get to point D, what do you need to do?
Maybe I was a geek for having as much fun with ochem as I did, but for those of us who enjoy using problem-solving skills, there is certainly an explanation as to why we think it was "easy".