rare disease assumption

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Mleechu

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2014
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
Points
4,601
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Hey. I am having a hard time understanding the concept behind rare disease assumption . I know that is says when dz prevalence is low we can say odds ratio = Relative risk but i don't exactly know what's going on.
 
I don't know what rare disease assumption is, but odds ratio always refers to retrospective studies while relative risk refers to prospective studies.
 
I don't know what rare disease assumption is, but odds ratio always refers to retrospective studies while relative risk refers to prospective studies.

Yep. That I know. But FA says if disease prevalence is low we can say OR = RR. I know this is known as "Rare Disease Assumption". But I am having trouble understanding why low prevalence would cause OR to become equal to RR.
 
Top Bottom