I did a post-bacc at Hofstra, completed the program with straight A's and a somewhat disappointed feeling. Without going into too much detail, I was one of those students who messed around for 3 semesters when I was 18, quit school till 23, went back and graduated with a 3.8 (psych degree, not counting my 18yo GPA), so I had prereeqs and GPA to fix. Believe it or not I could not get into any post-bacc programs on the AMCAS list, nor any of my local state schools. Got into Hofstra and figured since 1 semester costs $3k less than my entire Cal state education, it must be quality.
1) The Pros and Cons of their program (structure of the program, learning environment, cost, location, faculty, classes, difficulty, competitiveness, other students, buildings/classrooms/facilities, etc..)
Pros:
--Got my pre-reqs done in a little over a year, got my A's.
--Didn't have any trouble getting into the classes I needed.
--Cool campus, all old ivy-league-looking brick buildings on a large campus, FILLED with art, and a wide variety of trees. Really is a beautiful campus. They have this really great collection of statues that are of scientists, philosophers, etc that are spread around either studying or doing whatever claim to fame they did....probably the coolest bit of campus art I've ever seen.
--Free parking, Free tutoring.
--Nice library, good study space, open late.
--Very close to NYC, was useful for me since I had a great job at a friends company while I was at Hofstra.
--Faculty letter upon completion of program, with mock entrance interviews.
Cons:
--Nothing special given to post-bacc students. Nothing. I felt as if I was just going back to undergrad, which is more or less the truth. Didn't hear the word MCAT once.
--Faculty: I tried to develop relationships with post-bacc faculty but they weren't really open to just conversing, if it wasn't paperwork based they would wonder why I was trying to talk to them. All of my teachers did this thing where If i went to talk to them either generally about the subject or with questions, if it was anything that required more than a few sentences they would tell me to seek out the wonderful free tutoring the school provides.
--I had labs taught by grad students who basically just gave us the answers and socialized.
--Classrooms/labs fairly dated. Stone age compared to my Jr. College.
--Teaching style: 5 of the 8 science classes I took at Hofstra had less than desirable teachers. My gripes with all of them were the same;a large portion of the grade being outside my control, in-class instruction that was basically a few sentences per topic, absolutely no idea what would be on the exams, material on the exams having no permanent resources to learn from (their personal research, out of class lecture events during business hours etc), and what I would describe at some points as an 'odd' curriculum. The extreme example would be my general chem/bio1 courses. These courses at Hofstra were the hardest courses I have ever taken in my life. Mind you, I love the topics and got A's when I took these classes 3+ years ago. No joke they make med school seem like an absolute breeze. My bio1 teacher went in this crazy chapter order 1-22-33-23-3, and included stuff on the first exam from literally all over the book. We didn't learn about cells until month 3. I kid you not I read the books cover to cover before each exam and took multiple free online courses simultaneously and JUST rode the curve to an A. Nobody ever believes me when I tell them about the topics covered in the bio curriculum. My general chem teacher once opened his power point, sighed, said he didn't want to spend the time explaining molarity, and moved on. These are my extreme examples, but each of those 5 classes had some form of BS to them.
2) The kinds of classes you've taken and a description.
1 precalc, chem1/lab, bio1/lab
2: chem2/lab,calc
3: bio2, chem3/lab, physics/lab
4: phsyics2/lab, biochem
3) Something they wished they knew coming into the program
I don't want to say they are deceptive with their description about preparing you for med school, but you will get no preparation for med school. Cost does not equal quality. Being in class with other post-baccs would probably make a world of difference.
4) Something they would like to tell incoming students about your program
My review sounds negative but overall the school gave me what I needed, nothing less nothing more.
5) Tips for students applying to your program
Most entertaining thing on campus is watching the cramped Au Bon Pan line turn into a violent stampede right before classes start. The "Coffee on the quad" place is the best spot to study, the woman who runs it plays great music and it never gets busy.
6) Did it help you get into medical school/dental school/etc.?
In terms of getting pre-reqs done yes, absolutely no other reason. I had an extremely high MCAT score, great volunteer work, and amazing LORs.
7) Anything else you'd like to add
One interesting thing to note is that I never met any other post-bacc students who were not in their 1st semester. I think a lot of kids in the program leave in a semester or two and go in a different direction.
1) The Pros and Cons of their program (structure of the program, learning environment, cost, location, faculty, classes, difficulty, competitiveness, other students, buildings/classrooms/facilities, etc..)
Pros:
--Got my pre-reqs done in a little over a year, got my A's.
--Didn't have any trouble getting into the classes I needed.
--Cool campus, all old ivy-league-looking brick buildings on a large campus, FILLED with art, and a wide variety of trees. Really is a beautiful campus. They have this really great collection of statues that are of scientists, philosophers, etc that are spread around either studying or doing whatever claim to fame they did....probably the coolest bit of campus art I've ever seen.
--Free parking, Free tutoring.
--Nice library, good study space, open late.
--Very close to NYC, was useful for me since I had a great job at a friends company while I was at Hofstra.
--Faculty letter upon completion of program, with mock entrance interviews.
Cons:
--Nothing special given to post-bacc students. Nothing. I felt as if I was just going back to undergrad, which is more or less the truth. Didn't hear the word MCAT once.
--Faculty: I tried to develop relationships with post-bacc faculty but they weren't really open to just conversing, if it wasn't paperwork based they would wonder why I was trying to talk to them. All of my teachers did this thing where If i went to talk to them either generally about the subject or with questions, if it was anything that required more than a few sentences they would tell me to seek out the wonderful free tutoring the school provides.
--I had labs taught by grad students who basically just gave us the answers and socialized.
--Classrooms/labs fairly dated. Stone age compared to my Jr. College.
--Teaching style: 5 of the 8 science classes I took at Hofstra had less than desirable teachers. My gripes with all of them were the same;a large portion of the grade being outside my control, in-class instruction that was basically a few sentences per topic, absolutely no idea what would be on the exams, material on the exams having no permanent resources to learn from (their personal research, out of class lecture events during business hours etc), and what I would describe at some points as an 'odd' curriculum. The extreme example would be my general chem/bio1 courses. These courses at Hofstra were the hardest courses I have ever taken in my life. Mind you, I love the topics and got A's when I took these classes 3+ years ago. No joke they make med school seem like an absolute breeze. My bio1 teacher went in this crazy chapter order 1-22-33-23-3, and included stuff on the first exam from literally all over the book. We didn't learn about cells until month 3. I kid you not I read the books cover to cover before each exam and took multiple free online courses simultaneously and JUST rode the curve to an A. Nobody ever believes me when I tell them about the topics covered in the bio curriculum. My general chem teacher once opened his power point, sighed, said he didn't want to spend the time explaining molarity, and moved on. These are my extreme examples, but each of those 5 classes had some form of BS to them.
2) The kinds of classes you've taken and a description.
1 precalc, chem1/lab, bio1/lab
2: chem2/lab,calc
3: bio2, chem3/lab, physics/lab
4: phsyics2/lab, biochem
3) Something they wished they knew coming into the program
I don't want to say they are deceptive with their description about preparing you for med school, but you will get no preparation for med school. Cost does not equal quality. Being in class with other post-baccs would probably make a world of difference.
4) Something they would like to tell incoming students about your program
My review sounds negative but overall the school gave me what I needed, nothing less nothing more.
5) Tips for students applying to your program
Most entertaining thing on campus is watching the cramped Au Bon Pan line turn into a violent stampede right before classes start. The "Coffee on the quad" place is the best spot to study, the woman who runs it plays great music and it never gets busy.
6) Did it help you get into medical school/dental school/etc.?
In terms of getting pre-reqs done yes, absolutely no other reason. I had an extremely high MCAT score, great volunteer work, and amazing LORs.
7) Anything else you'd like to add
One interesting thing to note is that I never met any other post-bacc students who were not in their 1st semester. I think a lot of kids in the program leave in a semester or two and go in a different direction.