- Joined
- Nov 7, 2007
- Messages
- 76
- Reaction score
- 0
.............
Last edited:
Rather than staying home or working as a pathology assistant lets convince CAP and AMA to open a clinical patient care/hospital medicine fellowship for 1 year for pathologists/radiologists who want to get food on their tables at the end of the day and don't mind working as a doctor doing H and P rather than seeing their family die in hunger - being jobless. Anyways as we all know, pathology is doomed.
They killed the molecular pathology, CAP tried a lot with their "transformation" agenda which did not go anywhere. Whats the point. Are we waiting to see the end or shud we do something. No one else is gonna come to rescue if we dont do for ourselves.
This can only be done by the younger folks who are budding pathologists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNkpIDBtC2c
Are you pre-med? Seriously, who is going to hire you as a pathologist with one year of doing H&Ps? Dude you make no sense whatsoever.
I think he/she means after graduating from a pathology residency. I guess OP wants to go into path but is afraid of being jobless.
Several fellow and residents I know got signing bonuses. And some of them are high.
Yeah - that's true.Whether or not you get a signing bonus correlates with the location of the practice and how "desirable" that location may be. If you are in a location where 50 new grads are drooling to take the position, a signing bonus is the first thing to go out the window.
Yeah, I've never heard of anyone NOT getting a signing bonus/moving bonus when moving.
Signing bonuses are provided in Boston, a location where multiple pathology residents and fellows train.
All the academic pathology groups in the Boston area provide a signing bonus by paying relocation expenses or providing a lump sum at the time of recruitment. This information was confirmed just today.
Medical students considering a career in pathology should be re-assured that pathology is a great field, with plenty of jobs available for good candidates.
Daniel Remick, M.D.
Chair and Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center
Can any experienced paths out there comment on whether or not this is the real deal? I can't believe this after all I have heard on this forum. Thanx
SC
😎
Can any experienced paths out there comment on whether or not this is the real deal? I can't believe this after all I have heard on this forum. Thanx
SC
😎
Thank you for injecting some sense into this discussion. You guys are getting delusional. Moving expenses are not signing bonuses. Kinda funny that noone is actually posting actual figures but resorting to language like 'some of them are high' and 'nice chunk'Technically getting reimbursed for relocation expenses is not a signing bonus. Signing bonus is cash in tour pocket for signing the contract.
Thank you for injecting some sense into this discussion. You guys are getting delusional. Moving expenses are not signing bonuses. Kinda funny that noone is actually posting actual figures but resorting to language like 'some of them are high' and 'nice chunk'
While the OP is being a little ridiculous he's not far off. We're interviewing 5 hungry candidates for one position in our practice 4 of the 5 who have pretty impressive credentials with residency/fellowship at places like Hopkins and UCSF. Its an entry level position with a low starting salary. The three we've interviewed so far have said that the job market is incredibly difficult which may come as a shocker to the so many of you out there who apparently signed these amazing contracts with partnership and sign on bonuses.
Nope, practicing in the NE, trained in the SE. Job market was horrible even in the rural SEWell let me ask which part of the country you are at? Let me guess, West coast?
Nope, practicing in the NE, trained in the SE. Job market was horrible even in the rural SE
Thank you for injecting some sense into this discussion. You guys are getting delusional. Moving expenses are not signing bonuses. Kinda funny that noone is actually posting actual figures but resorting to language like 'some of them are high' and 'nice chunk'
While the OP is being a little ridiculous he's not far off. We're interviewing 5 hungry candidates for one position in our practice 4 of the 5 who have pretty impressive credentials with residency/fellowship at places like Hopkins and UCSF. Its an entry level position with a low starting salary. The three we've interviewed so far have said that the job market is incredibly difficult which may come as a shocker to the so many of you out there who apparently signed these amazing contracts with partnership and sign on bonuses.
Whatever. Job market is bad everywhere. I'm in the NE but hardly a highly desirable location. Again, the job market was bad in the rural SE.Location, location, location.
Whatever. Job market is bad everywhere. I'm in the NE but hardly a highly desirable location. Again, the job market was bad in the rural SE.
Funny story, I got a random e-mail while in training from a guy who saw my name on a report. Turns out he was a private practice pathologist in rural mississippi (not the state where I trained mind you) who was an alumnus from my medical school. He's like 'when you finish in a few years give me a call, i like to take care of well trained guys with southern ties' . Turns out his practice was recruiting when I was looking last year and I got the cold shoulder. Said they were looking for someone with more experience. Turns out there are a plethora of old crusty 'experienced' pathologists out there to choose from so new grads are at a major disadvantage. I guess the story isn't really that funny. Its kinda sad
Which region of the country do you guys think has the best job market? If not NE, SE, West coast, then it must be the Midwest?
Which region of the country do you guys think has the best job market? If not NE, SE, West coast, then it must be the Midwest?
Whatever. Job market is bad everywhere. I'm in the NE but hardly a highly desirable location. Again, the job market was bad in the rural SE.
Funny story, I got a random e-mail while in training from a guy who saw my name on a report. Turns out he was a private practice pathologist in rural mississippi (not the state where I trained mind you) who was an alumnus from my medical school. He's like 'when you finish in a few years give me a call, i like to take care of well trained guys with southern ties' . Turns out his practice was recruiting when I was looking last year and I got the cold shoulder. Said they were looking for someone with more experience. Turns out there are a plethora of old crusty 'experienced' pathologists out there to choose from so new grads are at a major disadvantage. I guess the story isn't really that funny. Its kinda sad
How about academics? Pay may not be great but I guess better than nothing. Seems like there are always a bunch of academic jobs on pathoutlines.
I've been lurking around this website for a few years. Everyone I know from residency and now fellowship has had a number of interviews and job offers this fall to start next summer, both academic and private, and a number of them have been really generous, more than I would expect for a fresh out of training Pathologist. Most people are open to moving and no one seems desperate to take a job. I think we all will be more or less set come January. I admit that I bought into the doom and gloom that everyone has been posting about incessantly here and was pretty worried this summer that I would have to settle but I just don't see that being the case for myself or my immediate peer group.
I do agree that you have to be open to moving and be the type of person that people want to have around. But this talk about jobless Pathologists doing H&Ps ... come on, if you're a reasonable trained, well-socialized person you should not be worried about being jobless. You may not end up with a 9-3 gig in San Diego but you will have a job.
Enkidu-
Is that claim based on anything, or just anecdotal? I struggle to believe this forum is anything more than an interesting diversion, not something with much influence on med students. But certainly agree about some positivity being needed on here. Try to do my part at least by promoting FP.
SDN - where no one will admit to reading or posting when you meet them in person, but everyone always seems to know what is posted here. 🙂
Try asking someone you meet on the interview trail if they read/post on the SDN pathology forum - all will deny it, but they will all know what was posted here and the general conversation trends.
Numerous medical students read this forum, not to mention the old medschool.com back in the early 2000's. It influences many, many medical students.
A lot of interesting information can be found here, but I'm pretty convinced 75% of the information posted in the pathology subform are from forum trolls (whether they know it or not).
Do not worry. Everything will turn out fine for you.
When interviewing candidates for a pathology residency position I almost always ask if they read SDN. I cannot recall any student claiming that they had not read SDN.
I also ask if they are concerned about most of the negativity posted. To their credit, they understand that SDN is not an authoritative source of information.
To make sure that communication is clear and open, I almost always post my real name and institution since I believe that I am accountable for my statements.
Daniel Remick, M.D.
Chair and Professor of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center
Speaking of pathologists posting messages online. Has anyone read about this case? Sounds like Dr Oppenheimer got sued for posting stuff about a urologist back in the day.
http://archive.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=6100
This is evidence in itself of pathology oversupply and commoditization.
I would be wary of academic pathologists who are subsidized 150-200 K plus free resident labor in addition to the "junior pathologist" creation who often get paid pennies on the dollar for what they earn. These folks are vested in a steady supply of free labor for the grunt work and a nice check besides.
Additionally, no community pathologist would say we are in oversupply if we actually needed help to get our work done! We are currently being pressed from all sides! Client billing, corporate labs and inducements, not even being able to negotiate to get in network with insurance, CMS and their tyranny, Obamacare, escalating premiums for employees, etc. etc. Some of these difficulties are shared by other specialties but many ate self inflicted by pathologist oversupply. We are a commodity and have no leverage other than hopefully being more competent and affable/available than an easily found replacement.
Dr. Remick,
How often do you get emails looking for candidates for PRIVATE jobs? I would say there "seems" to be more academic jobs than private jobs based on websites. Have you kept in contact with your graduates and they all have jobs? I would assume the Boston area job market is tough especially with the programs there, just like with any other large city of course.
The only place that one hears about unemployed pathologists is on studentdoctor.net.
Listen guys. I've been pretty vocal about the state of affairs in pathology right now. A few posts ago there's a guy asking for people to come out and say more positive things. Let me be clear. I have a job. Everyone that I trained with eventually found work (of the six exiting fellows, two of us took full time jobs in private practice, two took part time jobs in private practice (one wanted full time but could not find a full time position), and two took full time academic jobs. Unfortunately 9 of the other fellows did second fellowships which speaks to one of the problems of pathology training.
I never once said that there are unemployed pathologists. I never heard anyone on here say that there are unemployed pathologists. This is not the issue. Stop twisting words. The issue is that the current job market is distorted beyond belief. I won't regurgitate the details but look at the big picture. The fact that these in-office labs are in existence speaks volumes about the current state of affairs. Not only about the state of the job market and that there are people out there willing to work for pennies on the dollar (and this is money that belongs to pathologists!! can you imagine how many millions of dollars have been taken directly from the pathologists wallet in these types of setups?!) but also about the state of our leadership. How could they sit back and allow this to happen? Could you imagine a gastroenterologist or urologist working for a pathology group and taking a fraction of what belongs to them? Its so messed up and the generation before us sold their souls for a brief sense of security in knowing that they didn't completely lose out on biopsy revenue.
To be fair I appreciate BU Pathology's positivity but can't help to feel that he is out of touch with what's going on in private practice. I'm in the trenches. I overhear the business conversations my bosses have. Things are not OK, and its this attitude that has allowed this situation to denigrate to the level it is today. Wake up people. I think this is a forum where people can voice their opinions and I welcome others that differ from mine, but I have yet to hear a convincing argument to the contrary.
... The fact that these in-office labs are in existence speaks volumes about the current state of affairs. Not only about the state of the job market and that there are people out there willing to work for pennies on the dollar (and this is money that belongs to pathologists!! can you imagine how many millions of dollars have been taken directly from the pathologists wallet in these types of setups?!) but also about the state of our leadership. How could they sit back and allow this to happen? Could you imagine a gastroenterologist or urologist working for a pathology group and taking a fraction of what belongs to them? ....
Even if the job market for pathologists were great, I believe these arrangements would still exist, somehow. You can always find someone who's willing to do work for a little less $$$, for a more cushy schedule, etc. If there is money to be made and giant loopholes to allow it, someone will do it, and in fact has done it. This started long before the pathology job market was "saturated". The outlay for a small histo lab in the back of an office is a lot cheaper than the outlay for most radiology equipment, a portable chest X-ray just won't cut it this day and age. H&E slides, a couple special stains, on the other hand, are 100 year old technology, which even when automated is pretty cheap to produce. Even a small IHC panel can be had in the back of the lab for very cheap, and at worse you can send it out to a local reference lab. Add to this a couple of techs, some waste disposal, a CAP certificate, and voila! You're cooking. It's simply the "free market" at work.