Reading comprehension on CRACK DAT READING

[aznnytezx]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

I took two tests for crack dat reading, and i always sucked at reading. I never read a book in my life except those text books. First time i scored a 17, and second time i scored a 18.

Is this good enough to score a 18+ on the DAT? My goal is to get a 19-20 on the reading comprehension.

 

[R1Guy]

I took two tests for crack dat reading, and i always sucked at reading. I never read a book in my life except those text books. First time i scored a 17, and second time i scored a 18.

Is this good enough to score a 18+ on the DAT? My goal is to get a 19-20 on the reading comprehension.

I used Crack DAT Reading, and I was also scoring in the 17-18 range on those practice tests. I do not consider myself to be an exceptional reader, and my reading comprehension score on the real DAT was 22 (I used the search and destroy technique). So I wouldn't worry to much.

 

[Member 8586]

i scored 18,19,19,19,19 on my five CDRs and got a 22 on the actual RC section...CDR has a lot of tone/application/inference etc type of questions,...DAT had some too but def way less...and I think I even had the famous "physics" passage that everyone hates...i def hated it too lol

 

[R1Guy]

i scored 18,19,19,19,19 on my five CDRs and got a 22 on the actual RC section...CDR has a lot of tone/application/inference etc type of questions,...DAT had some too but def way less...and I think I even had the famous "physics" passage that everyone hates...i def hated it too lol

Yea, I agree completely with this. I do remember CDR being heavy on the tone/inference questions. My actual DAT had a few interpretation questions, but it was basically allsearch and destroy type questions.