Reading images

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

LanceArmstrong

Level X Elite User
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Let's say you're reading a CT scan. How much better is it when you're asked to look for something in particular rather than just no clinical description?
 
The reason I ask is because in my experience images without clinical correlations are very low yield in practice, especially when it comes to something thats not glaringly obvious.
 
LanceArmstrong said:
The reason I ask is because in my experience images without clinical correlations are very low yield in practice, especially when it comes to something thats not glaringly obvious.

Sometimes critical to have the clinical info, often helpful to have it, sometimes makes no difference, and infrequently quite misleading.
 
Docxter said:
Sometimes critical to have the clinical info, often helpful to have it, sometimes makes no difference, and infrequently quite misleading.


often helpful and sometimes critical - that sounds like an overwhelming plus