Reapplicant Advice

[NeonCedar]

Advertisement - Members don't see this ad

State of Residence: CA ORM/URM: ORM
cGPA: 3.58
sGPA: 3.59

GPA by Year:
Strong upward Freshman: 3.3 -> Senior: 3.86

MCAT: 507

Clinical Experience (260 hours):
Longitudinal free clinic involvement with direct patient interaction
Coordination/leadership responsibilities
Additional patient-facing exposure

Non-Clinical Volunteering (150–200 hours):
Community service focused on underserved populations
Ongoing involvement

Shadowing (60 hours):
Multiple specialties (surgical and non-surgical)

Research (4000):
2+ years full-time research (Currently full time position)
Multiple publications

Leadership (300+ hours):
Managed significant organizational budget
Co-founded student organization

School list:
California: UCSF UCLA UCSD UCI UC Davis Kaiser USC CUSM Charles Drew
OOS: Duke JH Mount Sinai Emory Rochester Einstein Jefferson Rosalind Franklin Hackensack Meridian Georgetown Arizona–Phoenix

Letters: 2 PIs, 1 advisor, 1 committee letter

Interview: 1 UC -> Rejection

Current Cycle: I submitted first week of June and submitted all secondaries within two-weeks of receiving.

Plan:
Retake MCAT
Increase volunteering hours with underserved communities (some what clinical)
More shadowing
More clinical but I can probably only get 50 more hours before resubmitting
Better school list

Questions:
How much improvement is realistically possible before next cycle and would my plan be enough? I believe that my writing is good, according to a few people. I also think that I have a strong narrative across my application and I think my academic stats and school list hurt me a lot. I want to stick to MD as I really enjoy research and want to continue to pursue it. I am open to any advice or any comments.

 

[PickaGodnPray]

Your stats were not competitive at all but 2-3 schools and those schools had a strong mission/area fit that you did not have from your low volunteer and clinical hours. You don't need more shadowing, really anything over 50 hours is fine. What would help is to have more clinical/non-clinical hours. The clinical is what is hurting you the most outside of your stats, imo.
If you want to stay MD, you need a higher MCAT and a much better school list. If you don't score better, add DO and look into MSU DO/PhD. Would still satisfy the research itch.

 

[Med Ed]

That is quite the unrealistic school list. Have you heard of the MSAR?

If you want to be competitive for MD, take a gap year to fix your MCAT and get more clinical (and a bit more non-clinical). Come back with a significantly improved app in 2028.

If you apply DO in 2027 you'll probably be successful. Your call.

 

[NeonCedar]

That is quite the unrealistic school list. Have you heard of the MSAR?

If you want to be competitive for MD, take a gap year to fix your MCAT and get more clinical (and a bit more non-clinical). Come back with a significantly improved app in 2028.

If you apply DO in 2027 you'll probably be successful. Your call.

With an improved MCAT and a few more clinical and non clinical hours, would an MD be unrealistic for 2027? Given I significantly change my school list.

 

[Med Ed]

With an improved MCAT and a few more clinical and non clinical hours, would an MD be unrealistic for 2027? Given I significantly change my school list.

Where are you with an MCAT retake?

 

[thiophorase]

as a heavy research ca orm applicant you will be competing with many applicants with 520+ scores. I would either try to raise your mcat score significantly or really increase clinical hours and nonclincial volunteering for a better mission fit. I don't think it is very realistic to apply this next cycle

 

[NeonCedar]

Where are you with an MCAT retake?

I am studying for it now with the intent to take it in May and my most recent FL was a 516

 

[Med Ed]

With an improved MCAT and a few more clinical and non clinical hours, would an MD be unrealistic for 2027? Given I significantly change my school list.

First off, my brain is switch back and forth between cycle years and matriculation years, which is confusing. I will stick to cycle years.

Let's assume you get a 516 on your retake. Here is your basic profile:
GPA - Neutral.
MCAT - Strong (with one retake).
Clinical - Low-neutral.
Non-clinical - Low-neutral.
Research - Strong.

People with this profile face a dilemma. The schools that are more research-driven also tend to be really into stats, which you don't really have. And the schools that are more clinically-oriented usually pay more attention to the clinical and service parts of the application, which you have but not in abundance.

If you get your 516 and apply with a better school list for the 2026 cycle, could you get in? Maybe. I can see you getting some nibbles and landing an acceptance. I can also see you getting skunked. I can see a lot of people asking why you don't just get a PhD. I do know that applying for the 2027 cycle would give you the time to build out a much stronger application.

 

[NeonCedar]

First off, my brain is switch back and forth between cycle years and matriculation years, which is confusing. I will stick to cycle years.

Let's assume you get a 516 on your retake. Here is your basic profile:
GPA - Neutral.
MCAT - Strong (with one retake).
Clinical - Low-neutral.
Non-clinical - Low-neutral.
Research - Strong.

People with this profile face a dilemma. The schools that are more research-driven also tend to be really into stats, which you don't really have. And the schools that are more clinically-oriented usually pay more attention to the clinical and service parts of the application, which you have but not in abundance.

If you get your 516 and apply with a better school list for the 2026 cycle, could you get in? Maybe. I can see you getting some nibbles and landing an acceptance. I can also see you getting skunked. I can see a lot of people asking why you don't just get a PhD. I do know that applying for the 2027 cycle would give you the time to build out a much stronger application.

I really appreciate your feedback and time! I am in that dilemma that my app is research heavy and research heavy schools value stats which I do not have. I really messed up with my school list this cycle and I think I should have just waited another year to apply, oh well we learn and move on. I think my focus will be acing the MCAT and adding hours to both clinical and non-clinical.

 

[PickaGodnPray]

I can add to this as an applicant that was in a similar position to you. I had an LM of 72 when I applied with a couple first author papers in high impact journals along with numerous middle author pubs in high/mid tier journals. My research was strong and tied into the rest of my service in which I had over 2k clinical hours and over 1k non-clinical. Despite this, my stats were low for those top research schools and I didn't receive an II from what is typically considered a "top research program", but still found success at other schools.
At the end of the day, the program I am going to most likely end up at is a school that recognized my niche interest in medicine and is located in a city where there is a need for someone who wants to serve this population that is normally left out of DEI health initiatives. They will help me to be the physician I want to be while I would have had to kick and scream at other institutions to leverage their resources to the population I hope to serve. All that to say, kill your MCAT, apply more broadly with a better list, and there WILL be a school that values what you bring to the table and will give you all the resources you need to get to where you want to be.

 

[NeonCedar]

I can add to this as an applicant that was in a similar position to you. I had an LM of 72 when I applied with a couple first author papers in high impact journals along with numerous middle author pubs in high/mid tier journals. My research was strong and tied into the rest of my service in which I had over 2k clinical hours and over 1k non-clinical. Despite this, my stats were low for those top research schools and I didn't receive an II from what is typically considered a "top research program", but still found success at other schools.
At the end of the day, the program I am going to most likely end up at is a school that recognized my niche interest in medicine and is located in a city where there is a need for someone who wants to serve this population that is normally left out of DEI health initiatives. They will help me to be the physician I want to be while I would have had to kick and scream at other institutions to leverage their resources to the population I hope to serve. All that to say, kill your MCAT, apply more broadly with a better list, and there WILL be a school that values what you bring to the table and will give you all the resources you need to get to where you want to be.

Thank you so much for this! It is reassuring hearing from someone in the same boat. I appreciate you sharing your experience and emphasizing fit. That's something I need to think more carefully about as I refine my school list.

If you don't mind me asking, how were you able to get so many hours outside of lab? Pubs in high impact journals require serious lab commitment.

 

[PickaGodnPray]

If you don't mind me asking, how were you able to get so many hours outside of lab? Pubs in high impact journals require serious lab commitment.

I started in the lab my junior year and continued doing the research during multiple gap years. Weekends I would volunteer in EMS or non-clinically.

 

[Mr.Smile12]

Thanks for burying the lead: You still got one interview (post-interview R).

Geographically speaking: where in CA did you grow up, and does this UC school serve that area with its community service/free clinic activities? Did your clinical experience overlap with teaching hospital systems that school serves?

Would this school give you feedback?

 

[NeonCedar]

Thanks for burying the lead: You still got one interview (post-interview R).

Geographically speaking: where in CA did you grow up, and does this UC school serve that area with its community service/free clinic activities? Did your clinical experience overlap with teaching hospital systems that school serves?

Would this school give you feedback?

You're spot on, I actually do have meaningful ties to the population that the school serves. The majority of my clinical experience is serving the same community they give service to. The school does not serve the area I grew up in. I would say that the UC that gave me an interview was my strongest fit. I did reach out to them but they did not give me feedback.

 

[NeonCedar]

Thanks for burying the lead: You still got one interview (post-interview R).

Geographically speaking: where in CA did you grow up, and does this UC school serve that area with its community service/free clinic activities? Did your clinical experience overlap with teaching hospital systems that school serves?

Would this school give you feedback?

Do you have any advice or insight on how schools look at re-applicants that they have interviewed in the past? I've been following their cycle and noticed that some re-applicants who previously interview were accepted this year, while others weren't.

 

[Mr.Smile12]

Do you have any advice or insight on how schools look at re-applicants that they have interviewed in the past? I've been following their cycle and noticed that some re-applicants who previously interview were accepted this year, while others weren't.

There will not be a solid rule on this. Some schools won't re-invite candidates who don't show significant improvement (or may have not done well on the first interview). Trying to find a pattern is not a good use of time.

 

[Faha]

Post your new MCAT score here when available and we can suggest a more realistic list of schools to apply to.