- Joined
- Sep 24, 2006
- Messages
- 916
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 4,571
- Medical Student
Not sure if this has been discussed here already, if so I apologize for my bad searching skills.
A couple of weeks ago a New York Times blod (http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/forced-rectal-exam-stirs-ethics-questions/) posted a story about a lawsuit against New York Presbyterian (Cornell's major teaching hospital). The blog has more details, but long story short: a guy came into the ER with a head laceration from getting hit in the head with a piece of wood that ended up requiring stitches. In the course of the ED's evaluation of this patient (construction worker maybe brought in by ambulance, maybe came in by himself) a resident tried to give the patient a rectal exam, which he refused. The resident tried, again, he refused again (a little more adamantly this time...). Fast forward a couple of minutes, and the patient is actively resisting the rectal exam and punches the resident. He was then intubated and the evaluation was completed.
When he woke up he was arrested for assault, and the charges were later dropped.
He's now suing the hospital saying he has PSTD from the whole event.
My question to those of you who know more than I do (MSI and EMT-I): was the rectal necessary? As I understand it, a combative patient is an AMS patient, therefore he can't refuse treatment cause he isn't competent to make his own decisions.
Thought?
Also, some of the comments on the blog are pretty interesting in their own right...
A couple of weeks ago a New York Times blod (http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/16/forced-rectal-exam-stirs-ethics-questions/) posted a story about a lawsuit against New York Presbyterian (Cornell's major teaching hospital). The blog has more details, but long story short: a guy came into the ER with a head laceration from getting hit in the head with a piece of wood that ended up requiring stitches. In the course of the ED's evaluation of this patient (construction worker maybe brought in by ambulance, maybe came in by himself) a resident tried to give the patient a rectal exam, which he refused. The resident tried, again, he refused again (a little more adamantly this time...). Fast forward a couple of minutes, and the patient is actively resisting the rectal exam and punches the resident. He was then intubated and the evaluation was completed.
When he woke up he was arrested for assault, and the charges were later dropped.
He's now suing the hospital saying he has PSTD from the whole event.
My question to those of you who know more than I do (MSI and EMT-I): was the rectal necessary? As I understand it, a combative patient is an AMS patient, therefore he can't refuse treatment cause he isn't competent to make his own decisions.
Thought?
Also, some of the comments on the blog are pretty interesting in their own right...