Regional vs General

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

Which is safest in a patient with low EF?

  • General

    Votes: 8 36.4%
  • Neuraxial Technique

    Votes: 3 13.6%
  • Doesn't matter

    Votes: 11 50.0%

  • Total voters
    22

militarymd

SDN Angel
20+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2003
Messages
5,886
Reaction score
22
Points
4,676
  1. Attending Physician
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
So for that dude in the other thread.

Which is the safest?
 
Anonymous polll here.....all you lurkers...vote up
 
general is ok as long as you have appropriate monitoring and hemodynamic/homeostatic goals for the appropriate case....regional is ok as long as you have the appropriate monitoring and hemodynamic/homeostatic goals for the appropriate case.

Its all about how you do what you choose to do.
 
general is ok as long as you have appropriate monitoring and hemodynamic/homeostatic goals for the appropriate case....regional is ok as long as you have the appropriate monitoring and hemodynamic/homeostatic goals for the appropriate case.

Its all about how you do what you choose to do.

Sorry Venty.

I'm a regional advocate.

Butta Homie can't argue with da numbas.

And da numbas say it dont matta.
 
Top Bottom