- Joined
- Jul 24, 2015
- Messages
- 589
- Reaction score
- 488
- Points
- 5,226
- Medical Student (Accepted)


Other than asking for feedback, it seems like a waste of effort on your part and a waste of time on both ends. Such a letter isn't going to change your outcome any. Asking for feedback is a different issue; you're already rejected, so it can't hurt you. If you think it would be useful on the off-chance they respond, go for it. Just be prepared for it not to pan out.Is it inappropriate to reply to rejection emails?
e.g. to express thanks for being considered, to (professionally) express disappointment, or to ask for feedback?
Other than asking for feedback, it seems like a waste of effort on your part and a waste of time on both ends. Such a letter isn't going to change your outcome any. Asking for feedback is a different issue; you're already rejected, so it can't hurt you. If you think it would be useful on the off-chance they respond, go for it. Just be prepared for it not to pan out.
Hell if I know. Again, though...what's it going to hurt? You're already rejected!It's not too soon to ask for feedback? I wasn't sure if we had to wait until the cycle was over.
Is it inappropriate to reply to rejection emails?
e.g. to express thanks for being considered, to (professionally) express disappointment, or to ask for feedback?
Thanks!What would be the point?????
You should ask for feedback (NOT consultation or advice), by contacting the Admissions dean.
Thanks!
It's ok to ask for feedback before the cycle is over?
Only if you get rejected.
what about waitlists?Only if you get rejected.
what about waitlists?
You won't get any feedback on those.
I only got feedback last cycle after patiently waiting until just before this cycle opened up. (The following isn't directed @ you Goro) As many of you know the cycles overlap so don't pester the adcoms if they take a couple of weeks to get back to you in may or even june
Why's that? So they provide feedback for pre-interview rejections, post-interview rejections, but not to waitlisted applicants? It seems like the borderline applicants are the most in need of feedback (pre- and post-interview rejections are more likely to have obvious flaws, ie. low stats/glaring gaps in EC's (pre-I) or poor interview skills (post-I), no?You won't get any feedback on those.
Why's that? So they provide feedback for pre-interview rejections, post-interview rejections, but not to waitlisted applicants? It seems like the borderline applicants are the most in need of feedback (pre- and post-interview rejections are more likely to have obvious flaws, ie. low stats/glaring gaps in EC's (pre-I) or poor interview skills (post-I), no?
Ah I see, I thought you meant even after the application season was over.Because waitlisted applicants are still in contention.