replying to rejection email

Started by p0gono
This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
Get help with your application

Use all the free resources available to you from SDN: articles, guides, expert advising, forums discussions, and school research.

p0gono

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Is it inappropriate to reply to rejection emails?

e.g. to express thanks for being considered, to (professionally) express disappointment, or to ask for feedback?
 
From a medical school? Don't bother. For other things, maybe. I got rejected from a TA job and emailed the professor back thanking her for the consideration. I wouldn't "express disappointment", that's kind of obnoxious.
 
Is it inappropriate to reply to rejection emails?

e.g. to express thanks for being considered, to (professionally) express disappointment, or to ask for feedback?
Other than asking for feedback, it seems like a waste of effort on your part and a waste of time on both ends. Such a letter isn't going to change your outcome any. Asking for feedback is a different issue; you're already rejected, so it can't hurt you. If you think it would be useful on the off-chance they respond, go for it. Just be prepared for it not to pan out.
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
Other than asking for feedback, it seems like a waste of effort on your part and a waste of time on both ends. Such a letter isn't going to change your outcome any. Asking for feedback is a different issue; you're already rejected, so it can't hurt you. If you think it would be useful on the off-chance they respond, go for it. Just be prepared for it not to pan out.

It's not too soon to ask for feedback? I wasn't sure if we had to wait until the cycle was over.
 
It's not too soon to ask for feedback? I wasn't sure if we had to wait until the cycle was over.
Hell if I know. Again, though...what's it going to hurt? You're already rejected!
I'd call and ask if you could ask for feedback...if the admissions office says not until the end of the cycle, do it later.
 
Dear University or College -

I regret to inform you that I must reject your rejection of my application. I would like to schedule my interview on December 2nd, 2015 at 8:30 am in the 8th floor conference room. I am looking forward to matriculating as a member of your class in the summer of 2016.

All the best,
Psai
 
what about waitlists?

Wait until at least May to inquire about standing within waitlist and feel out your odds at actually getting off said waitlist. Then, politely ask to schedule a meeting for feedback in person or ask for feedback informally through email
 
You won't get any feedback on those.

I only got feedback last cycle after patiently waiting until just before this cycle opened up. (The following isn't directed @ you Goro) As many of you know the cycles overlap so don't pester the adcoms if they take a couple of weeks to get back to you in may or even june
 
Advertisement - Members don't see this ad
My sense is that of the schools that give feedback, they wait until the cycle is over.

Feedback can vary from "you seemed nervous" to a full session of good feedback and pointing out areas of weakness/room for improvement.

I only got feedback last cycle after patiently waiting until just before this cycle opened up. (The following isn't directed @ you Goro) As many of you know the cycles overlap so don't pester the adcoms if they take a couple of weeks to get back to you in may or even june
 
You won't get any feedback on those.
Why's that? So they provide feedback for pre-interview rejections, post-interview rejections, but not to waitlisted applicants? It seems like the borderline applicants are the most in need of feedback (pre- and post-interview rejections are more likely to have obvious flaws, ie. low stats/glaring gaps in EC's (pre-I) or poor interview skills (post-I), no?
 
Because waitlisted applicants are still in contention.



Why's that? So they provide feedback for pre-interview rejections, post-interview rejections, but not to waitlisted applicants? It seems like the borderline applicants are the most in need of feedback (pre- and post-interview rejections are more likely to have obvious flaws, ie. low stats/glaring gaps in EC's (pre-I) or poor interview skills (post-I), no?