D
deleted728364
So my understanding of getting into a competitive PhD program is that rec letters (not publications, or “hours”) from known/famous faculty mean the most.
Is this effectively the same for the research evaluation for MSTP? Meaning if you could have 0 publications and <<4000hrs of research, but still gain the committee’s approval if you have a few letters from the biggest names in your field.
edit: words
Is this effectively the same for the research evaluation for MSTP? Meaning if you could have 0 publications and <<4000hrs of research, but still gain the committee’s approval if you have a few letters from the biggest names in your field.
edit: words
Last edited by a moderator: