question about research knowledge. my educational background is in developmental biology. my research is in computational biology and a seperate experience in neuroscience (global changes in neuropathic pain models). i'm intimately familiar with the research i have done and i can place it in a larger context, but i just don't have the in depth background a formally trained neuro person has to field anything that is very divergent from the research itself (those left field interview Q's). how in depth would you recommend me going into background literature to make me "interview-competent"? read a neurobiology text? it seems a bit much, but i wouldn't mind doing if it is necessary. those that interviewed let me know thanks a lot.


1K Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Jul 27, 2001
Visit site
Status (Visible)
You're an undergraduate student! Not a graduate! The interview is not some final examination... The majority of your interviewers will likely not be familiar enough with computational biology or neurobiology to pose questions that are beyond the scope of your research. And if, by some odd chance they are, then you just tell them that you didn't focus on that or you will look into it, etc. Honestly...you already took the MCAT. They know you know science. At the interview stage, they're much more interested in how you present your research than your in-depth knowledge of the overall field.


Dark Lord of the Sith
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Jun 4, 2001
Status (Visible)
  1. Attending Physician
It sounds like you know your stuff well. There's no need to make yourself the world's expert on a subject. Just be able to explain your research and how it fits into the big picture. :D


Senior Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Apr 29, 2002
Status (Visible)
It will probably depend on your interests. If you're excited about reading on some topics, go do it. Just be sure you're not forcing yourself to do it and that you're sincere in your interest. If you fake it they'll probably pick that up. Also I find that reading journal review articles and articles for the general audience good. Try Nature or Science, or even Newsweek/Time. I almost always enjoy those articles.
This thread is more than 18 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.
About the Ads