- Joined
- May 3, 2004
- Messages
- 12,949
- Reaction score
- 3,828
- Points
- 6,631
- Location
- Arizona
- Attending Physician
trying to do a little research. Anyone know which residency programs provide scribes for their em residents?
2 I know of are Penn state and university of Virginia.
Please let me know if the other ones.
incorrectEvery residency has scribes.
Not even close. It's very state-by-state and metro-by-metro. I've worked in some big places without scribes and some small ones with over the years.Every residency has scribes.
I think he means the residents are scribes for the attendings. Lol.Every residency has scribes.
I think he means the residents are scribes for the attendings. Lol.
Am I just an old fart knocker for thinking residents should be writing their own notes?
I did that when I was a resident. But we had paper charting with template sheets, which involved circling and took no time at all to complete. In that scenario, there's no need for scribes. Residents should have some experience with charting, so I don't think it's the worst idea in the world for them to chart, even in an EMR.
That said, if you're training at a high volume/acuity shop, which most residents are, the availability of scribes may help them focus more on clinical care rather than clerical duties, which is more important than learning how to click off boxes in an EMR, especially at the resident level.
True, but even with scribes, you're still doing that. You still have to tell them what to document in the ED course, physical exam, HPI etc. The only difference is you're not the one having to physically type it all in.
Am I just an old fart knocker for thinking residents should be writing their own notes?
I’ve never read an MDM by a scribe that has any substance.
I think he means the residents are scribes for the attendings. Lol.
I don't like using scribes mostly because of this. The time saved in HPI and exam isn't worth the money for me as an attending. But I digress.
Am I just an old fart knocker for thinking residents should be writing their own notes?
I’ve never read an MDM by a scribe that has any substance.
The scribe notes I have to read over the years are generally terrible, I truly can't believe people trust their licenses to that standard of documentation. Like, you're literally putting all of your hard work and your financial security in the hands of what is usually a premed
Macros >>>>>> scribes. I just don't see the point of a scribe if I'm going to have to review all of their charts later anyway. That just takes work I could be doing now and makes it a problem for future me. I'd rather keep adding to my lengthy list of macros for MDMs/discharges/etc and edit as necessary.Your mileage may vary, but my scribes are great. Like I said above, they are a college student, you are a physician. I routinely review and edit their notes, but even a basic HPI and doing all the clicks saves me a ton of time and stress. Some of my colleagues sign off on their notes without even reading them - that is not good practice.
This is exactly what I do. If you think there is some magic about your hip you are insane. Having a well trained scribe let’s you do the whole chart short of the mdm without need to do stupid stuff is worthwhile.As a prior scribe there's huge variability between scribes and on my aways the weakest scribes have been from the national companies. But overall, I strongly disagree. Most of the residents notes I've seen are downright absymal in comparison and how they aren't constantly sued is beyond me. I'm pretty sure most somewhat fresh scribes could write better notes than certainly any intern and PGY2. The exception obviously is MDM because they don't have any medical training. Just dictate the MDM to them and have them put everything else in.
This is exactly what I do. If you think there is some magic about your hip you are insane. Having a well trained scribe let’s you do the whole chart short of the mdm without need to do stupid stuff is worthwhile.
I tell them what to change. Using macros for hpis and exams puts you at risk. Don’t believe me? Go to the acep reimbursement conference. The proof is in the pudding. The feds are watching.
Macros >>>>>> scribes. I just don't see the point of a scribe if I'm going to have to review all of their charts later anyway. That just takes work I could be doing now and makes it a problem for future me. I'd rather keep adding to my lengthy list of macros for MDMs/discharges/etc and edit as necessary.
Most of the residents notes I've seen are downright absymal in comparison and how they aren't constantly sued is beyond me.
I think it depends on what your macros are. If you have a basic physical exam that you can do from the door, then add in a focused exam of (insert why they are here) I think that’s fine. If you have a macro for potential early apply return precautions or seizure precautions - I think those are fine. You do them the same every time and need to document them. The problem is when you use the macro for something you didn’t do.
Not all resident and attendings notes stink. Some of us still teach the business of medicine. My residents are taught from orientation on the different levels of charting for coding, etc. Our residents graduate and all chart extremely well from a coding standpoint.
Same. Its uncommon though.Not all resident and attendings notes stink. Some of us still teach the business of medicine. My residents are taught from orientation on the different levels of charting for coding, etc. Our residents graduate and all chart extremely well from a coding standpoint.
This is precisely my approach. I have a Macro for "normal exam", and then I can click or dictate to my heart's content.
My entire MDM for common cases is all Autotexts. Nonspecific belly pain, going home ?