Review and Step 1 Prep

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

chickensoupdr

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
May 2, 2010
Messages
432
Reaction score
34
What would be the best way to just review some of the stuff that was taught during first year, while focusing a little more on the material that is Step relevant? Is there a recommended set of review books or video/audio lectures that anyone used and would recommend?
 
I haven't taken step 1 yet but I imagine for first year material UWorld + First Aid should be more than enough.
 
For the first year stuff, physiology- BRS Physiology; anatomy- don't waste your time, FA; Neuroanatomy- high yield neuroanatomy
How much first year material is on step 1? I know that Pathoma is mainly for Path but it does cover some Physiology that is relevant to the diseases it covers. Is that enough or does one really have to go through the whole BRS Physiology?
 
What would be the best way to just review some of the stuff that was taught during first year, while focusing a little more on the material that is Step relevant? Is there a recommended set of review books or video/audio lectures that anyone used and would recommend?

Besides Path (use Goljan or pathoma), I would recommend Kaplan lectures notes and the videos. The notes you can buy from Amazon.
 
No extra resources are necessary for phys if you learned it well in class. Same for most other topics. It's nice to have them if needed to reference, but the only subject that nearly everyone uses a topic-specific supplement beyond FA & UW is path +/- micro & pharm.
 
How much first year material is on step 1? I know that Pathoma is mainly for Path but it does cover some Physiology that is relevant to the diseases it covers. Is that enough or does one really have to go through the whole BRS Physiology?

Based on a typical 2 year curriculum, there is not a lot of MS1 material tested directly on step 1. However, a lot of MS2 builds on MS1. If you don't know abdominal anatomy, you won't be able to make a differential for RUQ pain, you won't know why luminal perfs cause shoulder pain, you would understand why posterior duodenal ulcers can cause hemorrhage, etc. If you don't know basic fluid dynamics/physiology pretty much nothing in cardio will make sense to you. If you don't know neuroanatomy none of the strokes or brainstem lesions will make sense to you.

Basically if you don't understand MS1, MS2 will be 100% memorization and you'll want to blow your brains out.

Sorry if this sounds mean, but "Does one really have to go through the whole BRS Physiology?" is hilarious. BRS physiology is such a short book with only the highlights of physio. It's like the FA of physiology. You should already know everything in it by the time MS2 is over, but if you don't it is something to flip through.
 
Based on a typical 2 year curriculum, there is not a lot of MS1 material tested directly on step 1. However, a lot of MS2 builds on MS1. If you don't know abdominal anatomy, you won't be able to make a differential for RUQ pain, you won't know why luminal perfs cause shoulder pain, you would understand why posterior duodenal ulcers can cause hemorrhage, etc. If you don't know basic fluid dynamics/physiology pretty much nothing in cardio will make sense to you. If you don't know neuroanatomy none of the strokes or brainstem lesions will make sense to you.

Basically if you don't understand MS1, MS2 will be 100% memorization and you'll want to blow your brains out.

Sorry if this sounds mean, but "Does one really have to go through the whole BRS Physiology?" is hilarious. BRS physiology is such a short book with only the highlights of physio. It's like the FA of physiology. You should already know everything in it by the time MS2 is over, but if you don't it is something to flip through.

Well I'm not saying Physiology is irrelevant but from what I can see Pathoma covers a lot of the relevant Physiology though obviously not on the scale of BRS.

Anyway I actually did try to read BRS Physiology but it's more of a review than something to learn from. I ended up reading the Physiology sections in First Aid Organ Systems. It basically explained all the concepts in First Aid. And of course UWorld.

That's why I asked if going back and doing BRS Physiology was really that necessary.
 
Well I'm not saying Physiology is irrelevant but from what I can see Pathoma covers a lot of the relevant Physiology though obviously not on the scale of BRS.

Anyway I actually did try to read BRS Physiology but it's more of a review than something to learn from. I ended up reading the Physiology sections in First Aid Organ Systems. It basically explained all the concepts in First Aid. And of course UWorld.

That's why I asked if going back and doing BRS Physiology was really that necessary.

Try costanzo. It is more of a textbook and will explain concepts much better than the first aid organ system
 
Kaplan path has a lot of good info imo. Lots of stuff not covered in pathoma. Still, pathoma is way better
 
How is Pathoma way better if Kaplan Path has more info? Does Kaplan Path cover a lot useless extra stuff?

If more info was better, then Robbins would be the best and we wouldn't have conversations like these.

Pathoma is better at explaining things and covering what is believed to be the highest yield material. Kaplan is more concise than Goljan RR and Robbins, but has more info than Pathoma. The extra info could be useful for school exams, improving your understanding of pathophys, integrating concepts, etc.
 
Top